A reasonable approach would be to abandon any thoughts of right or wrong in any individual, but to attempt to understand that person. Really, if anyone has any belief that the aforementioned list is a good idea I'd say that an examination of the way things really work would point out that it is strictly and only keeping another under control. Such a list could not lead to freedom or relief. In terms of spiritual understanding it is insanity. God help the poor who participate on either end.
Back in the early '70s Sec Checking was known as Integrity processing. This "whole Track" list came from there and was renamed "sec Check" only later when the Sea Org went totally mad.
But as Integrity Processing there was no thought of right or wrong at all. It dealt purely with what the pc came up with that was a transgression in the society he was part of at the time, and so he built up charge on it. Which charge was being relieved with the process.
So acts that were "overts" in one society were not overts in another. It all depended on context. All the auditor cared about was getting the charge off the question (if it read). Things such as making reports to the Ethics Officer were a total travesty of the auditor's role and were never done.
A person is never wrong. That fundamental should not be violated. To ensure it one would check only what the person has a problem with in present time, in other words what a person conciously wants changed. In this case the list and the auditor is deciding, not the person.
My issues with SCN tech include its scope. The path is far shorter and easier than it is made out to be. All one should be doing is helping free up the person's viewpoint so he can see for himself. That isn't a long stretch.
That is my opinion of course. But there is a reason for the tremendous backlash against the COS. I believe it is simple: one is not allowed to become free then pursue one's own path. It isn't that some didn't find a free enough viewpoint to operate, it is that they weren't really free to find different viewpoints which keeps the freeing process going. That takes life. One sees best through other viewpoints, not auditing. Auditing looks within. One needs to look out.