Wendy seems to like to write letters. From a post on wwp:
Re: Scio Wendy Honnor's letter to Senator Xenophon
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quote:
From: Wendy Honnor <
[email protected]>
Date: Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 9:49 AM
Subject: RE: Wow! - OTVIII Geir Isene's Doubt Formula
Dear Geir
Thank you for your email [ed: The email wasn't from Geir Isene. lrn2read]. I read it with great interest.
I examined it carefully. There seemed to be some data missing.
I wondered how many people you have helped?
As you didn't mention it.
Or how many people you have audited in the last year. As you didn't say.
In all your comm you did not express the results that you might have
obtained in applying Scientology to help others - which after all, is
the goal of Scientology.
I would imagine a tremendous sense of personal guilt at being OTVIII
and not actually auditing people every day as a profession or
contributing in a big way, and per the technology of overts and
withholds, detailed by LRH, this could lead to you being so critical.
I am a Book One Auditor. I have audited many thousands of hours and I
have helped many thousands of people in my 20+ years in Scientology.
When I see outpoints in any group, or in individual beings I do all I
can to help turn that around. Your exit from Scientology without
pushing through to change the things you personally see as wrong,
(which I am not saying here are actually true, but you are of course
entitled to your opinion) is a demonstration of your failure to apply
the technology.
The door is always open for you to come back of course. And it's never
too late for you to start helping others in the order of magnitude
expected of somebody at your level on the Bridge.
I know that every time I audit a good session on another person, I am
filled with a sense of belonging and happiness and joy and
understanding of LRH and the group and how best to serve it and help
it - even greater than the magnificent wins and understanding I have
received from auditing and study.
If you were a Class VIII with tens of thousands of hours of auditing
others, and if you had put an Ideal Org in Norway for example, single
handedly, with all your flow of hundreds of people, bringing them in
from your own practice as an auditor and as a Field Minister, then I
might have had some interest in your viewpoint.
The absence of your own stats in this area, on your "Doubt Formula"
tell quite a story by their absence.
But on completing my own assessment, using the Hubbard Chart of Human
Evaluation, about you as a being, I have decided that you are no more
a source of truth than any mosquito that is flying along beside the
huge battleship of the Scientology movement. For we are a group of
people, who nobody would even begin to say are perfect, but who are
working hard to free mankind. Show me some other group that is even
entertaining the idea that they might help mankind, let alone,
actually rallying to do it.
I suggest you do a big O/W write up on your overts against mankind and
your fellow Scientologists - of both ommission and commission. There
is a way out for you. For only honesty can create case gain. And this
withhold of not doing enough to help, can bring with it tremendous
justification from the individual who so cruelly criticises.
I have found great peace and happiness in putting my shoulder to the
wheel and applying the references of "Keeping Scientology Working".
I reject entirely your claims and your views. For I am right in there,
at the heart of this group you cast your cruel barbs at, and we are
not even slightly affected by your claims. Because we are pushing
forward the only hope that man has. What will you do? - open a cake
stall outside the local post office and raise pennies to feed the
starving hoards!
You knew that you were not fit to receive OTIX and X and so you ended
here. Before you had to face the truth of it. That you are not worthy
of the remainder of the Bridge to Total Freedom in your current self
created state.
Love
Wendy Honnor
Anon informed Geir Isene of the above correspondence from Wendy Honnor and he took over from there.
Quote:
Dear Geir
> Thank you for your email. I read it with great interest.
>
> I examined it carefully. There seemed to be some data missing.
>
> I wondered how many people you have helped?
I will give you an excerpt:
- I have held seminars to thousands of people, topics have varied from
Tone Scale, Dianetics, The Factors, Admin Scale, Recruitment, The
Dynamics, ARC, KRC, Study Tech, my gains in Scientology, Org Board,
general management tech, Ethics, particle physics and Scientology,
Cosmology and Scientology, the family unit, etc, etc
- I was responsible for more than half the first starts of Oslo Org over a
period of 9 months (the only period I did this analysis for because it was
needed for my OT VIII elig.
- I have been on lots of national and local media in 4 countries with
messages on Scientology and the tech
- Last year I got more than 150 people through their personal Admin Scale
for their lives.
- I have supervised kids on comm courses and study tech courses in the ApS
organization I have been running for two years.
- And the list goes on
= Number of people helped? I have lost the count, it's thousands.
> As you didn't mention it.
> Or how many people you have audited in the last year. As you didn't say.
> In all your comm you did not express the results that you might have
> obtained in applying Scientology to help others - which after all, is
> the goal of Scientology.
> I would imagine a tremendous sense of personal guilt at being OTVIII
> and not actually auditing people every day as a profession or
> contributing in a big way, and per the technology of overts and
> withholds, detailed by LRH, this could lead to you being so critical.
I understand your need to impose guilt - that is "making another guilty of
an overt act". This is covered by LRH in a few taped lectures.
> I am a Book One Auditor. I have audited many thousands of hours and I
> have helped many thousands of people in my 20+ years in Scientology.
> When I see outpoints in any group, or in individual beings I do all I
> can to help turn that around. Your exit from Scientology without
> pushing through to change the things you personally see as wrong,
> (which I am not saying here are actually true, but you are of course
> entitled to your opinion) is a demonstration of your failure to apply
> the technology.
Then a question from me to you: Have you really tried to make right the
wrongs you see in the church today?
> The door is always open for you to come back of course. And it's never
> too late for you to start helping others in the order of magnitude
> expected of somebody at your level on the Bridge.
With the hundreds of e-mails I have gotten after announcing my Doubt
publicly saying how much this has helped them, I may have helped more
people in two weeks than I have ever done before.
> I know that every time I audit a good session on another person, I am
> filled with a sense of belonging and happiness and joy and
> understanding of LRH and the group and how best to serve it and help
> it - even greater than the magnificent wins and understanding I have
> received from auditing and study.
This is very good. I commend you for your insistence to help others.
> If you were a Class VIII with tens of thousands of hours of auditing
> others, and if you had put an Ideal Org in Norway for example, single
> handedly, with all your flow of hundreds of people, bringing them in
> from your own practice as an auditor and as a Field Minister, then I
> might have had some interest in your viewpoint.
There are many Class VIIIs in contact with me that see there is an
abundance of abuses that need to be handled. Many of them are OT VII or
VIII as well. They see it, they are taking action to handle it. Now, IF
Int Management is indeed suppressive, what would you say after the scene
have been thoroughly cleaned up while you did nothing?
> The absence of your own stats in this area, on your "Doubt Formula"
> tell quite a story by their absence.
See above.
> But on completing my own assessment, using the Hubbard Chart of Human
> Evaluation, about you as a being, I have decided that you are no more
> a source of truth than any mosquito that is flying along beside the
> huge battleship of the Scientology movement. For we are a group of
> people, who nobody would even begin to say are perfect, but who are
> working hard to free mankind. Show me some other group that is even
> entertaining the idea that they might help mankind, let alone,
> actually rallying to do it.
I am surprised you would do such a quick evaluation of me using so few data
points.
> I suggest you do a big O/W write up on your overts against mankind and
> your fellow Scientologists - of both ommission and commission. There
> is a way out for you. For only honesty can create case gain. And this
> withhold of not doing enough to help, can bring with it tremendous
> justification from the individual who so cruelly criticises.
I am again surprised that you would conclude that I did not do enough to
help others when you earlier admit that you lack the data on my
contributions.
Even as I have now given you this data (I can give you much more if you
like), I do not believe this would change your viewpoint. You may want to
refer to my blog post on "fixed ideas" as to why.
> I have found great peace and happiness in putting my shoulder to the
> wheel and applying the references of "Keeping Scientology Working".
> I reject entirely your claims and your views. For I am right in there,
> at the heart of this group you cast your cruel barbs at, and we are
> not even slightly affected by your claims. Because we are pushing
> forward the only hope that man has. What will you do? - open a cake
> stall outside the local post office and raise pennies to feed the
> starving hoards!
I sense upset. I have none. I am going to do my utmost to save the tech
from the suppression it is now under.
> You knew that you were not fit to receive OTIX and X and so you ended
> here. Before you had to face the truth of it. That you are not worthy
> of the remainder of the Bridge to Total Freedom in your current self
> created state.
Again you conclude. In fact you seem to be C/S-ing with very little data
to go on. I would call out tech on that one.
I would very much like your viewpoint on my proposal LRH4ALL.
->Geir Isene
--
They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security,
deserve neither liberty or security.
(Benjamin Franklin)
Geir Isene -
http://www.geir.isene.com - Geir Isene (isene) on Twitter
Quote:
On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 11:25:44AM +1000, Wendy Honnor scribed:
>
> I know the truth about you Geir. You can't fool me. Your stats (not even
> clearly stated) are pathetic for a person at your position on the bridge
> - what battles did you fight, what personal risk did you take, what did
> you sacrifice for mankind - NOTHING.
Again you conclude on very little data. I told you I could extend my list
of contributions if you like. Just for reference, I will give you one
more; I was the ED of U-MAN Norway for 10 years - it was the most
successfull U-MAN office during the last three years I ran it. During the
ten years, I introduced more than 6000 people to the tech - I evaluated
more than 6000 OCA tests. There is more, just ask.
> There are thousands who each do more in one week that you did in an
> entire career in Scientology!
Another bold conclusion. To help set stright your generality, please give
me the names of the people holding 1000 seminars in one week. I would very
much like to meet with them.
> You didn't do enough and yet you took so much! You are not fit to be an
> OT Ambassador. That is why you are gone. Because you were not man enough
> for this game of saving an entire planet.
I will be on the ball ridding the church of the human rights abuses. After
all, those wo do far more than you and I are constantly harassed and
suppressed. I will not stand and look at that.
->Geir Isene
