Slander from WWP

[Dulloldfart]

Or maybe not add any more useless posts to it....

Paul

 

[DCAnon]

He's a troll. Disregard. If you get upset about someone being mean on the internet, then they'll continue because you're butthurt. Just troll them back or say you want to have hot mansex with him.

 

[lionheart]

Hey Folks,

Thanks for all the communication on this - it's now all good my end, and I can forget about it! No doubt there'll be more crap in the future, but I don't reckon it will phase me anywhere near as much. There's a first for everything, and yes, I am learning lessons about the internet . This net of ours is such a gift and a wonderful thing mostly - love it, love it, love it!

Love,
Carmel

Well done, Carmel!

 

[Terril park]

I responded on WWP quoting Carmels OP. I really have no feel for the current moderators. Lol! They havn't moderated me yet and this is only my second or third post.

Carmels a sweetie. They also bashed Emma and I'll probably have words to say about that.

How dare the assholes!!!


--------------------
Below is Carmel's response to your posts. Basically you have a problem with truth and accuracy and a nasty attitude to life.

Let us know when your stats of getting people out of COS are 50% of Carmels.

Please give adequate instructions on how to delete a scilon webpage or STFU. While youre at it explain how one gets of their mailing list.

You remain the unnaceptable face of protest.

 

[Emma]

I don't think thats a good idea Terril.

I appreciate the sentiment but better just to report the posts and be done with them. I also replied on that thread and regret it now.

These people have no soul and no life. Let them wallow in their cesspool.

 

[Voltaire's Child]

God. If you don't like total crap, especially total crap about yourself, then don't spread it around! Shit-talking from WWP (pretty much the national sport over there) has nothing to do with ESMB.

Carmel has the right to rebut crap that's being said. And this libel was posted ABOUT ESMB so it is relevant. Sorry, but you're wrong wrong wrong.

 

[Voltaire's Child]

Lionheart,

I don't think this was an OSA attack. There are people who attack other critics who are critics themselves. Yes, OSA attacks and slanders and libels, no question. But so do other people every now and again.

 

[Feral]

Sweetness, remember my PM to you.

When someone doesn't or refuses to duplicate the truth of you, but instead runs lies on you, it acts as a wrong item/wrong indication.

You don't have to duplicate or accept their shit. Leave it with them . . . poor them. It's them what are missing out on the goodies.

Though I know one can be upset at the notion that others might be negatively influenced by the shit . . . . them wot are dull enough to believe the crap as presented with all of its out-points and obvious nastiness and ill intent is not someone you ought be too concerned about being "liked" by.

Be empowered by the goodies who can duplicate the truth of you

R

This is very helpful, you've had a good response hereon this thread and should see that so many of us do see who you are and what you've done.

I wouldn't have reacted to 'Scathead', and felt doing so would feed him, but you have and gotten a positive result, so there!

 

[Carmel]

Perhaps close the thread?

Good idea - enough said and done, and it's finished as far as I'm concerned.

I'll be requesting that it's done.

 

[dr3k]

Of course I don't! You don't think OSA are so stupid as to leave proof lying around, do you?

If it looks like OSA, smells like OSA and behaves like OSA ....

The old GO used to use "jerkoffs" to carry out their dirty work for them, especially when it came to dissident groups.

Carmel's natural reaction, like Emma's with her PM, was is to wonder who it is on ESMB who are behind the "attack". This is a natural reaction that OSA trade in in order to cave in groups critical of the CofS.

The originator of the "attack" is most likely not OSA, but being manipulated behind the scenesl by PM by OSA. That's the most likely scenario.

Let me sort of turn your question around:- Do you seriously think OSA won't be trying to run ops like this to cave in the disident/protest movement?

The solution is simply to work out what OSA's goals and methods are and then not play their "enemy" game.

the absence of evidence is NOT the absence of evidence.

 

[TheSneakster]

Of course I don't! You don't think OSA are so stupid as to leave proof lying around, do you?

If it looks like OSA, smells like OSA and behaves like OSA ....

You seem to have forgotten that there are OSA-trained folks in the critic community and at least one amongst the Anons. Some of whom appear to have axes to grind against folks who won't take a hard-line anti-Scientologist stance, too.

Do not be so hasty to blame external sources under these conditions.

Michael "The Sneakster" Hobson
I am *not* anonymous

 

[SchwimmelPuckel]

Lionheart,

I don't think this was an OSA attack. There are people who attack other critics who are critics themselves. <snip>

.. So they do! - How observant of you Fluffy! - And OSA has observed the same thing.. Just the perfect 'environment' for a discreet 'operative'. Totally anonymous.. Totally safe.. Apply a some deviousness and intelligence to the 'communication', and it'll be good as impossible to prove foul play..

You know Fluffy, you might be right.. That this is a 'lone madman', and not organised OSA.. But why do you find it neccesary to 'deflate' a suspicion about OSA?

I find suspecting OSA healthy! - It prompts interesting debate about their methods... And all this needs to be re-debated frequently..

Just look at all the posters here who's horrifyingly amazed at Hubbards Admissions.. While we thought that everybody knew the admissions!

I suggest that we make sure that everybody know about OSA. And when we have what 'looks' like an OSA attack... Why, that's a fine opportunity to have another OSA slagfest!

 

[SchwimmelPuckel]

the absence of evidence is NOT the absence of evidence.

Erhm..

"the absence of evidence is NOT evidence of absence.".. ?

 

[dr3k]

Erhm..

"the absence of evidence is NOT evidence of absence.".. ?

It's an homage to Samuel L Jacksons paranoid conspiracy nutjob (similar to Lion) in "The Boondocks" linked video related...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_w5JqQLqqTc

 

[Terril park]

I don't think thats a good idea Terril.

I appreciate the sentiment but better just to report the posts and be done with them. I also replied on that thread and regret it now.

These people have no soul and no life. Let them wallow in their cesspool.

Sure Ems.

They are not all a part of a cesspool. There is a culture of mocking. Its
really about games. Some in that milieu get very viscious and seem to be a part of the general anarchy. The attack on Carmel was in the viscious category and can be well seen as having no basis in fact. Was Malicious.
As were attacks on you.

Those engaging in malicious attacks like that do a disservice to the critical movement and the anons. Its different to the usual fun and games.

 

[SchwimmelPuckel]

hehe..

 

[Alanzo]

hehe..

The ...uhhh...prong... in your hat is waving more tonight than usual, SP.

Stop it.

 

[SchwimmelPuckel]

Are you using a new computer with more gigaflops? - I haven't changed any animation delays on it..

 

[byte301]

Alanzo, I wish you hadn't said that. I am dying laughing at SP's hat now. I never noticed the "prong" before!

 

[Emma]

This thread is now closed.