You may check more about KHTK at Vinaire's Blog (see the signature below).
KHTK #9
Note: In looking, one simply recognizes what is already there. If nothing is there then one recognizes that nothing is there. For each of the following directives, simply accept non-judgmentally whatever is presented by the mind, and experience it without resisting. Check the directive again to see if something more is there. If nothing is there then go to the next directive.
“Look around in your mind and spot something…
“That is associated with unconsciousness.”
“That is associated with waiting.”
“That is associated with a mystery.”
“That is associated with sex.”
“That is associated with eating.”
“That is associated with a symbol.”
“That is associated with thinking.”
“That is associated with an effort.”
“That is associated with an emotion.”
“That is associated with looking.”
“That is associated with knowing about.”
“That is associated with not knowing.”
“That is associated with knowing.”
Give enough time necessary for something to come up. If nothing comes up then go to the next directive.
This evening I ran the above process (KHTK #9) on my friend Ivan and it produced a sort of calmness that I have not seen in him before.
Once he understood that it was all about letting the mind peel itself, and that it had nothing to do with digging into the mind, the whole session became a poetry of effortlessness for him.
Ivan looked at quite a few things as they came up to view. It took us about an hour and half to go from "unconsciousness" to "thinking." By that time he was feeling very calm and peaceful. We just let things happen and the session gradually went into a discussion about the process itself.
We looked at what happened in the process. The very first noticeable thing was that there was no restimulation at all. It was almost like a learning process. One looked at what came up, then one automatically grasped how all those things that came up were connected. It was like gradually uncovering the basis of it all... call it archetype imagery or whatever. No suggestion was made at any time.
There was no requirement that Ivan had to report on what he looked at. Ivan simply commented whenever he wanted to, otherwise he non-judgmentally looked at whatever came up and accepted it as an is-ness without resisting. This made the session go very very fast. At one time Ivan commented that he was glad that he did not have to report on what he was looking at. It would have taken him half an hour to describe what he just looked at.
In the end Ivan talked about having a "much broader awareness" and a "big smile on my face." There was no jumping with joy or "tone 4 enthusiasm." There was simply a deep happiness.
Ivan suggested that one could probably record the above commands, and also the phrases "something else" or "another one", which one could then re-play with the press of certain buttons, and thus run the session on oneself.
I would like to make an observation that the buttons "sex" and "eating" seemed to take a longer time compared to other buttons but they could finally be navigated successfully. It was important especially in these two cases to keep the KHTK principle foremost of not diggng into the mind, and also not adding visualizations to what one was looking at.
Now some people here may say that I am doing Scientology because I am using the Know to Mystery scale. Nothing can be farther from truth. Scientology is defined not so much by organization of data as by how that data is applied.
The problem comes in Scientology from digging into the mind when no response comes up. In KHTK one simply drops the question altogether if nothing comes up. This is a BIG difference right there.
Many people have benefitted on lower Scientology grades. My premise is that permament gains occur only to the degree the mind is allowed to unstack or peel itself. Miraculous gains may seem to occur by digging into the mind as Scientology does, but such gains don't stick. Besides, when one digs into the mind, the surrounding layers of mind are likely to cave in creating further problems. Scientology simply makes more money through this scam by creating more problems and not handling them permanently.
This whole liability of cave-in, repairs etc. is avoided with KHTK approach of simply focusing on the unstacking of the mind, and not digging into the mind at all. KHTK is still in a research phase and the above premise needs to be confirmed. Hence I need to check how a Scientology process might work with KHTK approach. Obviously, this also requires changing the wordings of the process to suit KHTK approach.
I don't know if I have confirmation of that premise yet; but, so far, the same Scientology processes seem to be going much faster and without effort and with much deeper gains when the KHTK approach is applied. Interestingly, the use of an e-meter, and the requirement to report on one's case, will only slow down a KHTK session and reduce its efficiency.
.
