Flag-2005
Patron with Honors
I only know Ron from his lectures and writings.
My opinion within those are still very high.
Just a few things to start off.
He said he was only a man, fame was a rock and that he does not want to be idolized. Yet we have multiple standing ovations and busts all over the place.
Why did we not follow the scriptures?
He said we do not involve ourselves in the 2D of others as it has never worked and actually only worsens a situation.
So again Orgs go against his clearer writings to show their favorite 'sex and pain' reference?
He also talks about SPs and that they have 12 traits and to declare someone an SP he doesn't make case gain, but also has a majority of these traits.
He also says to be safe you need to look at the reverse of the traits to see if the person has these white hat traits.
He wanted to avoid 'witch hunts'
I have never seen a declare order that listed the traits and tried to prove the positive and negative traits against the accused.
Why is it that inside we simply do not apply what is written?
All the the Declares I have read all read as if they were cut and paste from the last one.
Here is what Dennis Stevens says about Ron
"Yes as I say we were very, very fortunate. Most of the planet don’t know how fortunate we were to have Ron during that period 1911 to 1983. And we certainly, the vast majority of mankind, didn’t appreciate his genius. Sure he was a flawed genius. Most geniuses are you know. The last perfect genius, well, I think they nailed him up on a cross. So I think Ron could be excused for being a flawed genius. During the 1950s when I believe Ron was at his best as a research Scientologist, some of his material was breathtaking in its simplicity and breathtaking in its application."
What do you think?
My opinion within those are still very high.
Just a few things to start off.
He said he was only a man, fame was a rock and that he does not want to be idolized. Yet we have multiple standing ovations and busts all over the place.
Why did we not follow the scriptures?
He said we do not involve ourselves in the 2D of others as it has never worked and actually only worsens a situation.
So again Orgs go against his clearer writings to show their favorite 'sex and pain' reference?
He also talks about SPs and that they have 12 traits and to declare someone an SP he doesn't make case gain, but also has a majority of these traits.
He also says to be safe you need to look at the reverse of the traits to see if the person has these white hat traits.
He wanted to avoid 'witch hunts'
I have never seen a declare order that listed the traits and tried to prove the positive and negative traits against the accused.
Why is it that inside we simply do not apply what is written?
All the the Declares I have read all read as if they were cut and paste from the last one.
Here is what Dennis Stevens says about Ron
"Yes as I say we were very, very fortunate. Most of the planet don’t know how fortunate we were to have Ron during that period 1911 to 1983. And we certainly, the vast majority of mankind, didn’t appreciate his genius. Sure he was a flawed genius. Most geniuses are you know. The last perfect genius, well, I think they nailed him up on a cross. So I think Ron could be excused for being a flawed genius. During the 1950s when I believe Ron was at his best as a research Scientologist, some of his material was breathtaking in its simplicity and breathtaking in its application."
What do you think?
He made sure to tell us of his incredible exploits and OTness, making it clear that he was in fact some sort of super-being and was just being modest. With all the stories that he told, it seemed that his life was straight out of some ‘Boys Own Adventure’, and he told us that he “Always learned to tell the lesser tale.”! Hah!
