Terril park
Sponsor
I made a search with that nick and nothing came out. Nevermind.
Bad searcher. Try below
http://6586588762636697408-a-180274...hxQb-OEXgBzuiEPj-VXI5YQlE6RNVE&attredirects=0
I made a search with that nick and nothing came out. Nevermind.
Once the Cos created the Tax Compliance Office whose job it is to police the COS members to adherence to paying all back taxes owed to the
Federal Reserve Banking system no I mean the "IRS" (who is incorporated in Porto Rico) and keeping current with all state and federal taxes or the person in violation will be barred from further service even though they have money on account. This policy makes the COS an IRS member organization through the Law of Agency. So it doesn't matter who is on the board or who isn't the COS is part of the IRS tax collection system as are many other religious institutions. L.R.H. wrote " keep your taxes defensible". The War is over mantra was a scam cooked up between the IRS and COS to perpetuate the illusion that the COS really won something.What they lost is their rights to privacy and the 1 and 4 amendments. DM is a government man whose job it is to control and strip it members of all the money he can and steal from its staff members of as much time as they remain ignorant to the realities of his mission
And LRH and/or DM aren't bat-shit-insane? What's the difference who is in charge of a dying cult anyway?
good application there!
"Don´t defend, always attack."
I see that the you really duplicated the "good" data and apply them. I bet you had an OSA or Ethics post when you were inside... Now you have Vladimir Ilich Lenin as your symbol? Are you a dialectic materialist, the lenin type, or more the Trozki style? Do you actually really know anything about it?
Instead of going over any and all of my single points, you can only diminish, insult and flare. I have cross-checked and it seems a repetitive attitude in you.
Well good luck with your attitude. I´m not getting anymore into it. I´m only gonna discuss in a factual and respectful way. Why is it that some people go crazy in this board when a Scientology term is used? Must it be all for or all contra? Are there no grayshades? Do we still need to play war against the invisible "so and so" (put an etiquette here)? Do we still need to etiquette, and once labelling, make the other to a THING, not a person, and therefore less worth? Can we learn?
Perpetuating old patterns will not do.
Get a bit of the hate out of your body, Wenlock. Will help you.
I´m into a sane constructive discussion of different, even opposed viewpoints. For people that have already "solved" everything and have all the answers ready, diminish others, and need to be on "top", I can only say to make their own cult.
A well written post.
Mick is Fixated and can't be fixed.
Forget him by putting him on Ignore, as I did.
good application there!
"Don´t defend, always attack."
I see that the you really duplicated the "good" data and apply them. I bet you had an OSA or Ethics post when you were inside... Now you have Vladimir Ilich Lenin as your symbol? Are you a dialectic materialist, the lenin type, or more the Trozki style? Do you actually really know anything about it?
Instead of going over any and all of my single points, you can only diminish, insult and flare. I have cross-checked and it seems a repetitive attitude in you.
Well good luck with your attitude. I´m not getting anymore into it. I´m only gonna discuss in a factual and respectful way. Why is it that some people go crazy in this board when a Scientology term is used? Must it be all for or all contra? Are there no grayshades? Do we still need to play war against the invisible "so and so" (put an etiquette here)? Do we still need to etiquette, and once labelling, make the other to a THING, not a person, and therefore less worth? Can we learn?
Perpetuating old patterns will not do.
Get a bit of the hate out of your body, Wenlock. Will help you.
I´m into a sane constructive discussion of different, even opposed viewpoints. For people that have already "solved" everything and have all the answers ready, diminish others, and need to be on "top", I can only say to make their own cult.
I knew that I saw something to that effect someplace, that you had to be a taxpayer in good standing in order to be "on lines" with Cof$. That inspite of the Hubturd having a deep and abiding hatred for the IRS and the income tax.
Meanwhile, "taxpayer" is a word with a specific legal definition, not to be confused with the expression "tax payer". A "taxpayer" is a "person" (another word with a specific legal definition) who is subject to Title 26, the Internal Revenue Codes. Anyone who understands how tax liability is incurred can cease being a "taxpayer" at anytime. For most Americans, that is a simple (but not necessarily easy) matter of ceasing the use of an SSN.
If I am reading you correctly, you are saying that it would be impossible to be a member of Cof$ in good standing unless you agree to participate in Social Security as well as all of the tax liabilities it creates for you. Can you produce that SPD?
Pete
A well written post.
Mick is Fixated and can't be fixed.
Forget him by putting him on Ignore, as I did.
The government has been doing this for years. See Frank Church Committeeroflmao.
Incorporated in Puerto Rico?
No its not - why, instead of just looking at something presented to you do you not do the research necessary to actually arrive at the facts? The IRS is a department correctly founded within the Department of the Treasury of the US. Did you actually bother to research it?
The Authority of the Internal Revenue Service
to operate within the fifty (50) States
The Bureau of Internal Revenue and the alleged Internal Revenue Service were not created by any Act of Congress. These are not organizations or agencies of the Department of the Treasury, or of the federal government. They appear to be operated through pure trusts administered by the Secretary of the Treasury (the Trustee). The Settlor of the trusts and the Beneficiary or Beneficiaries are unknown. According to the law governing trusts, that information does not have to be revealed. You will not find the Bureau of Internal Revenue, or the Internal Revenue Service, or the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms fisted in 31 USC, Chapter 3, as an authorized agency of the Department of the Treasury.
The Philippine Customs Administrative Act was passed by the Philippine Commission between 1900 and 1902, which created Trust Fund #1, the Philippine special fund (customs duties) (31 USC 1321). The Act was administered under the general supervision and control of the Secretary of Finance and Justice. The Philippine Commission passed another Act known as the Internal Revenue Law of Nineteen Hundred and Four. This Act created the "Bureau of Internal Revenue" and the federal government's second trust fund, Trust Fund #2, the Philippine special fund (internal revenue). Article 1, Section 1, of the Act provides that: "There shall be established a Bureau of Internal Revenue, the chief officer of which Bureau shall be known as the Collector of Internal Revenue. He shall be appointed by the Civil Governor, with the advice and consent of the Philippine Commission, and shall receive a salary at the rate of eight thousand pesos per annum. The Bureau of Internal Revenue shall belong to the Department of Finance and Justice."
At some unknown date, before 1940, another Bureau of Internal Revenue was established in Puerto Rico, along with Trust fund #62 Puerto Rico (Internal Revenue). These two Bureaus are the only Bureaus of Internal Revenue which have ever existed, one in the Philippines and the other in Puerto Rico. In 1953, the United States relinquished its control over the Philippines.
The Federal Alcohol Administration Act of 1935 was declared unconstitutional in 1935, and the operation was then transferred off shore to Puerto Rico. 27 CFR 250.1 1 provides the following definitions:
Its why the drivelling fools at this whole conspiracy webstie ALWAYS get it wrong. they deliberately mistake correlation for causation they have no idea what a logical fallacy is and they ALWAYS argue from incredulity and ignorance (look them up, they are logcial fallacies).
What conspiracy drivel that the COS has Tax Compliance Officer. Call the
the church and ask them. I have seen policy letters stating this fact.
The law of agency means that if one party contracts another to perform
a function than it is assumed that the party performing the duty is part of
the issuing agency which means the cos performs tax compliance of its
members for the IRS establishing a working partnership.
I hole no brief for either Scientology or the IRS. But the ridiculous assumption that there is something in Scientology that is worth anything is ludicrous
The COS is worth Billions and even though membership is down it is still a cash cow for the top execs and the board members. Where does the money go. Who really knows. Your statement is illogical
- which anyone who has done services can quite happily tell you. Do you have ANY sane argument as to
WHY the IRS would take over the CofS?
To create a one world government the governments use religious leader to
control their members so they will go quietly in the night while their constitutional rights are being supplanted by a police state. Conspiracy theory. I think not.
http://www.baptistboard.com/showthread.php?t=9990
A Pastor has come forward to blow the whistle on a nationwide FEMA program which is training Pastors and other religious representatives to become secret police enforcers who teach their congregations to "obey the government" in preparation for a declaration of martial law, property and firearm seizures, and forced relocation.
I thought not.
Hi Pete,
I cannot produce it, but it was quite a few years after 1993, if I don´t remember wrongly. Now it is so all over the planet, in different continents and different orgs. I know people in 2 different continents, which with payed services cannot go on-lines as they are not in perfect standing with their taxes. Anything appearing in session for this matter will be enforced, and the pc will be taken to OSA for adress. Will be routed off of any service, the matter will be handled directly with OSA and with Ethics. C/Ses will route off pcs for handling before continuation of any services. Also tailor made metered questions are frequent regarding this issues. It´s not just a side thing, but something central nowadays. This is fact.
I learned from an ex member, Pixie, on ESMB chatboard that was into tarot and card readings that the diamond on a regular deck of cards is the equivalent of the "Coin" representing money in the Tarot deck, hence the CST logo visible from space is a "Here's where I hid the loot" marker for the returning reborn L Ron Hubbard"
In a book called Mission into Time, A Test of Whole Track Recall Hubbard went to considerable lengths wasting everyone's time and taking the Apollo all over the Mediterranean to dig holes in the sand.. looking for the LOOT that he buried last lifetime, and he could not find it..
Perhaps he decided that he was not going to make THAT same mistake again?
Hence the CST double diamond logo visible from near earth orbit...
THERE"S WHERE I HID THE LOOT!
Coming from a guy that was almost hit by a freight train on venus, it makes perfect sense to me.
I´m also versed in epistemology, and philosophy of science, Kuhn, Hume, Locke, Bacon, Foucalt
Third, one can also follow on intuition, or gut-feeling and THEN look for the facts. The more I live, the more I do it. It gets me the best results many times, I´m getting. When I disociated the gut from the head, many problems happened, such as not seeing the OBVIOUS in Scn. (Ignosis, it´s called in another thread).
The government has been doing this for years. See Frank Church Committee
Its a common practice for FBI,CIA, AFT etc to infiltrate groups which pose
a perceived threat with agent provocateurs.While on staff there were two
church members who worked for US intelligent agencies. One was caught by interview the other sent a letter to the mission to appoligies for his spying.
Once a foot hold is established the agents will work with intelligent agencies and carry out their directives.
The biggest out point is if you were to apply for staff and had a family menber who was employed by police deptment, IRS, CIA, FBI ect. you would not be allowed to join staff. Then why did the cos put an IRS agent on its
board of directives.
What a shame you can't spell his name then,
I want to add here, that LRH´s data series, are an excellent tool to find illogics and track back things. There is plenty of tools on logic, and so on, but some aspects of the data series are truly unique and very valuable.
I want to add here, that LRH's data series, are an excellent tool to find illogics and track back things. There is plenty of tools on logic, and so on, but some aspects of the data series are truly unique and very valuable.
Can LRH's "data series" be used to find fallacies in LRH writings/Scientology?