My submission vent trough as far as it can for us Jooripaeans.
I think this is good. Did you encourage other Scientologists to also make submissions? I think it's good because I feel if each stakeholder has a chance to present what they consider relevant, the committee will make the right decision. From all the data I have, the Church of Scientology is, on balance, a corrupt criminal organization. I'm totally willing to change my mind about that, if someone can contradict the facts I am aware of. I welcome the debate.I sent my submission in and it has been accepted and will be circulated to the
committee members.
Did you use those words "back-door quasi inquiry" in your submission? Or is that just the wording you give to us here on ESMB? I'm sort of on a kick lately, pointing out how people posting here seem to be oblivious to the fact that this forum is also quite public. If you truly feel this inquiry is invalid, you'll want to be sure the senators know that and know which submission is yours.I kept it relevant to the matters at hand and why Scientology should not be put on trial through a back-door quasi inquiry.
I hope Australia makes a law that suits their needs. I'm curious what "teams" you are referring to. Am I on a team? If so, which one?May the best team win.
IAAS
Nice try Zinj, only the only proven criminal conspiracy is that of Anonymous attacking the Church. Two of them are in prison for their efforts.
That makes it 2 - nil to the Scientologists.
So far all of the Anon and ex-member claims about the Church have resulted in no charges of a criminal nature. They have resulted in an outspoken raver in the Australian parliament who has been joined by a couple of mad psychiatrists.
IAAS
Nice try Zinj, only the only proven criminal conspiracy is that of Anonymous attacking the Church. Two of them are in prison for their efforts.
That makes it 2 - nil to the Scientologists.
Nice try Zinj, only the only proven criminal conspiracy is that of Anonymous attacking the Church. Two of them are in prison for their efforts.
That makes it 2 - nil to the Scientologists.
So far all of the Anon and ex-member claims about the Church have resulted in no charges of a criminal nature. They have resulted in an outspoken raver in the Australian parliament who has been joined by a couple of mad psychiatrists.
IAAS
Nice try Zinj, only the only proven criminal conspiracy is that of Anonymous attacking the Church. Two of them are in prison for their efforts.
That makes it 2 - nil to the Scientologists.
So far all of the Anon and ex-member claims about the Church have resulted in no charges of a criminal nature. They have resulted in an outspoken raver in the Australian parliament who has been joined by a couple of mad psychiatrists.
IAAS
Originally posted by I AM A SCIENTOLOGIST
I sent my submission in and it has been accepted and will be circulated to the committee members.
I kept it relevant to the matters at hand and why Scientology should not be put on trial through a back-door quasi inquiry.
May the best team win.
IAAS