ESMB has entered archive mode. All posts and threads that were available to the general public are still readable. The board is still searchable. 

Thank you all for your participation and readership over the last 12 years.

If you want to join in the conversation, please join the new ESMB Redux at

texas court

Discussion in 'Monique Rathbun' started by Mimsey Borogrove, Oct 12, 2015.

  1. Mimsey Borogrove

    Mimsey Borogrove Crusader

    Unless I missed it, they still haven't ruled yet, correct? I was wondering what would give them pause. Could it be the underlying question has them in a bind: Does a criminal organization that abuses the court system, misrepresents itself as a valid religion and uses the religious amendment to shield itself, deserve equal protection under the law?

  2. freethinker

    freethinker Sponsor

    No, only human beings deserve equal protection of the laws; only human beings are born or naturalized, which is what the 14th Amendment says. Religions and cults cannot be hurt, only people can.

  3. Mimsey Borogrove

    Mimsey Borogrove Crusader

    So miscavage deserves equal protection, though he's sociopath running what is essentially a criminal organization of dupes that commits fraud constantly?

    Isn't an odd twist he's using the anti slap law which helps an individual fight a giant corporation to trash an individual.
    Maybe that's the issue they're wrestling with - he's perverted the law's intent?

    I hope all this time produces something worth the wait.

  4. freethinker

    freethinker Sponsor

    Didn't say he deserves the protection especially when he is acting in a representative capacity and not for his own religious beliefs.

    He's being sued as a corporate head, not some guy exercising his beliefs.

    If they rule in favor of Miscavige then it will mean their AntiSlapp law is worthless to the purposes it was created for which is to protect the little guy.