freethinker
Sponsor
You probaly know this because you are , well, connected, but HAL from 2001 was a mock up from IBM. If you go back one letter from I-B-M, you get H-A-L. But you knew that anyway.
All joking aside, some of the terminology in Scientology has great value in real-life situations. . .
Scieno-Scenario: Two Scientologists just finished a very romantic candlelight dinner at his ocean view home. Sparks begin to fly as they lay down on a bed together. He leans over and is about to passionately kiss her when she suddenly pulls back and announces--
FEMALE SCIENTOLOGIST
Ya know, I think we should have a com cycle.
I'd like to get in two-way-com about our second dynamic
MALE SCIENTOLOGIST
Oh, okay. I got that just now when you
put some CI on my lines and my kiss
postulate got unmocked.
FEMALE SCIENTOLOGIST
It's just that before we go too far, I need
to know if you really....well you know what
a girl likes to hear before she sleeps with someone.
MALE SCIENTOLOGIST
I know. We've been dating for two years and
I've never said it to you before...
FEMALE SCIENTOLOGIST
Oh darling, I long to hear you say those
special beautiful words to me.
MALE SCIENTOLOGIST
(gently takes her hand,
gazing into her expectant eyes)
Dear, I.....I.....
(shyly hesitates)
I really....
FEMALE SCIENTOLOGIST
Yes, darling, my zero is in,
it's safe, you can tell me...
MALE SCIENTOLOGIST
I really........am pulling in flow two
orders of magnitude admiration particles for you.
Scientology: The language of Love!
You can see the list here: http://tonyortega.org/2013/10/12/to...he-show-get-to-tinseltown/#comment-1084225544
I had to look that up. That's yukky! I thought of testicles.
Scoots won't be very happy ... 'Drunken Maggot' is completely missing!
Scoots won't be very happy ... 'Drunken Maggot' is completely missing!
READ THE WHOLE OPINION
This gives me much hope for the future.
A Judge who really gets it....
arnie lerma
You probaly know this because you are , well, connected, but HAL from 2001 was a mock up from IBM. If you go back one letter from I-B-M, you get H-A-L. But you knew that anyway.
You have a very naughty mind, DB! I'm shocked.
PS. Can we meet later and discuss this????
Scoots won't be very happy ... 'Drunken Maggot' is completely missing!
This isn't the old days when the cult could fuck with you and hardly anyone knew, this is the age of the internet and even governments are experiencing the power of it via Edward Snowden so if they fuck with Dib Waldrip, that will become world news real fast.
I don't think Texas judges intimidate easily. This is new turf for Scientology, NEGATIVE EXPOSURE WORLD WIDE!
Yes, I agree. But that doesn't mean the cult won't still try. They are living in the pre technological past with all their stupid policies on fair game etc, and they still do that stuff, even now. I hope the judge has a squeaky clean past, and I kind of hope the cult does have a go at him, if only to see the ensuing shit storm in the media about it.
One may assume CO$ has looked for dirt on Judge Waldrip and come up with little or nothing.
http://factnet.org/scientologys-foolproof-method-judge-tampering
One may possibly assume these tactics have been relayed to the judge.
Let the games begin.
He does have a clean past. They'll have to make something up. I dare them to try.
It would piss the Jefferson brothers off for one thing. Wallace might even quit the team if they try to fair game the judge. He still has a fairly long career ahead of him and he is the former Chief Justice of Texas. Not even he will allow himself to be associated with such low life antics against another jurist and member of the State Bar.
What this exchange makes obvious: Making only 100% qualified statements is damn fuckin' hard, tedious and bothersome, which probably is what the cult wants it to be.
Imagine sentences like this one: The defendant's ("defendant" as defined in Texas state law $ so-and-so chapter so-and-so) husband ("husband" as defined in USA federal law $$ so-and-so chapter so-and-s) delivered ("delivered" as defined in Texas state law $$ so-and-so chapter so-and-so) unauthorized ("unauthorized" as defined in Texas state law $$ so-and-so chapter so-and-so) as defined in Texas state law $$ so-and-so chapter so-and-so) auditing ("auditing" as defined by the "Church of Scientology" in court document so-and-so, page so-and-so chapter so-and-so).
And THAT sentence is only approximately 50% qualified.
If one wanted to go down that road, it would turn the whole lawsuit into one monstrous word-clearing session, which might be what the cult wants.
Jus' my 0.02€
Yes, I agree. But that doesn't mean the cult won't still try. They are living in the pre technological past with all their stupid policies on fair game etc, and they still do that stuff, even now. I hope the judge has a squeaky clean past, and I kind of hope the cult does have a go at him, if only to see the ensuing shit storm in the media about it.
Which is why legislation and legal contracts typically start with a "definitions" section, which operates as a glossary for terms used thereafter, thus avoiding having to deal with heavily qualified statements like that.