Hello to you:
I have always been an, as you say, Tech person, and seldom an evaluator.
In order for an evaluation to be an evaluation an assessment is usual.
This, in order to qualify as an evaluation, would, one may conclude,
include a reasonably complete understanding of whatever one may wish to
evaluate. The latter would also include reasonable testing of, in this
case, the Tech.
Man though the sun was a coal fire until the last hundred years or so.
Then an assessment was made, using acurate technology, and reasonable
test were performed to proof the results.
Interestingly those whom had embraced the coal theory were split upon
presentation of the evidence, some simply acknowledging this ,new idea,
and others whom set about evaluating and invalidating this new Nuclear
Physics and those who had discovered it.
I would be most interested in a qualified evaluation of dianetics, of course
the evaluator would have word cleared the book and Co Audited to perhaps,
shall we say Clear. So I look forward to an evaluation, and good luck.