Here's from the Tech Dictionary again and I'm using definitions two, four and ten: <snip>
Fair enough. That is what it says.
When I was a sup, I came across many students who couldn't understand how a static with no mass etc. could get into so much MESTy trouble. I used to deal with that confusion by making a difference between the terms
static and
thetan. Hubbard was not consistent in his terminology. The static has no mass etc, but the thetan . . .
From memory, the first reference I would use was the basic auditing series HCOB, The Magic of the Communication Cycle, where as he goes downscale the thetan starts considering himself as MEST and thereby begins to obey the laws of MEST. I would also use Hubbard's story in the Phoenix Lectures of Dr. MacDougall weighing patients at death and discovering thetans weighed an ounce or two. Usually that was enough Hubbard-lore to satisfy the student.
There are other references, like the History of Man (book) section where the thetan/body relationship is like the sliver in a thumb, with the sliver being the human body and the thetan the thumb, i.e. not only is it located in space and time but it extends outside the body.
There are several Hubbard quotes in this 2008 post of mine at
http://www.forum.exscn.net/showthre...d-body-thetans&p=109283&viewfull=1#post109283, including a description of a body sitting in a block of electronic gelatin with marbles scattered throughout it (anchor points), which also matches his general description of a thetan.
-----
As for reality, as opposed to the Hubbaverse, my thoughts about it are:
1. The counterpart to Hubbard's static is the spirit essence of a person. If living on Earth then it is split with roughly half engaged with a body and half remaining in the spirit world (see Dr. Michael Newton's works for details).
2. The counterpart to the thetan is all the subtle energy parts of a person, including the spirit part down here. The most "visible" [see * below] part would be the aura bodies.
3. As for anchor points, maybe Hubbard mis-perceived something there and constructed this invented anchor-point edifice that others dutifully "saw."
4. My PaulsRobot3 RAW4 module is all about investigating one's subtle energy parts and bodies. There are lots of diagrams and explanations there (not mine!). One info page about aura bodies is at
http://paulsrobot3.com/woowoo/raw4/info-aura.htm. Below is a diagram of the human aura. Note the similarity between the aura and Hubbard's thumb/sliver or gelatin soup.
* Here is a drill to see the coarsest part of the human aura:
The following is quoted from "Hands of Light" by Barbara
Ann Brennan, one of my favourite books.
"With the light dim in the room, hold your hands so that
the tips of the fingers point towards each other. Hold
your hands in front of your face at a distance of about two
feet. Make sure there is a plain white wall for a
background. Relax your eyes and softly gaze at the space
between your fingertips, which should be about one and a
half inches apart. Do not look into bright light. Let
your eyes relax. What do you see? Move your fingertips
closer and then further apart. What is happening in the
space between the fingers. What do you see around the
hand? Slowly move one hand up and the other down so that
different fingers are pointing to each other. What has
happened now? About 95% of the people who try this
exercise do see something. Everyone feels something." [I am
quoting directly. My personal opinion on that "Everyone"
is that if someone is determined to feel nothing while
doing this exercise then that will be the result.]
"...Most people see a haze around the fingers and hands
when trying to sense the aura. It looks somewhat like the
heat wave over a radiator. It is sometimes seen in various
colors, such as a blue tint. Usually, most people see it
as colorless in the beginning...."
Paul