Veda
Sponsor
Not even Hubbard referred to OT 2 comps as " OTs". They were pre OTs.
I sat down to do OT 2. I had no expectations of it iether working or not working. I was also somewhat familiar with OT 3 materials at that time.
I followed instructions. It hit me like a ton of bricks. Many somatics and stuff turned on and then off and I had great wins. Loads of reads and FTAs
also.
This has been the experience of all in the FZ who were ready to do this level. I know of no exceptions.
Did you not get any gains on this level?
BTW It cost me £500. This included re treading meter drills and the solo course.
OT 2 places a person at effect; it's not auditing, except in the most superficial sense. That it may feel good, or provide a thrill, only means that those with that experience will stick on it, as an "aberrative pleasure moment" or experience - an experience where they were subtly overwhelmed by something they didn't fully understand.
I'm only interested in actual auditing, and that means knowing what I'm doing, and causatively looking.
