I do not know you. You speak in the manner of critic, yet you use Scientologese, "VFP". Hmm....
Nick
Check over a few of RB's posts and you'll know him soon enough.
I do not know you. You speak in the manner of critic, yet you use Scientologese, "VFP". Hmm....
Nick
I do not know you. You speak in the manner of critic, yet you use Scientologese, "VFP". Hmm....
Nick
I do not know you. You speak in the manner of critic, yet you use Scientologese, "VFP". Hmm....
Nick

Teril,
the truth of the matter is, than in none of the emails I received from either yourself or the other two people had anyone else copied into them (visibly).
As for 'M' now receiving auditing from the south group. Well that is all I really wanted anyway. Despite the fact that I was dissapointed with the way he behaved in front of you, I still had a lot of affinity for him. My discussion over the phone with him was the only time anyone has spoken to me and known with absolute knowingness who I am and where I am and talked to me at my case level. Despite the perceived eccentricities, he is a very wise man with some great knowledge. I always felt he would be a great contributor which is why I never really gave up on him and his 2-D. I even said to Na at the end, that he would be a good person to start a group with.
When I suggested bringing the 2-D along at the end, you guys were very panicky about it. You were even shocked at my suggestion that someone out there had agreed to audit him? And now he's receiving auditing from the group?
This is social tone and desperation. I am sure that a recovery effort on the other guys will now be put in place, whereas if I hadn't had kicked up a fuss, it would never have happened because they are PTS etc etc. Having them recovered was what I wanted but was given a list of what was wrong with them instead.
.... Oh and M called me the other morning several times letting me know about getting auditing. It was not his usual tone. I detected something in the voice. After the meeting with you, I know he nearly threw the towel in on getting auditing. I am not suprised he is now receiving auditing from Victoria. The double sidedness of it all just stinks. (And not on his behalf either). You wanted absolutely nothing to do with M's 2-D, let alone him.
Illusionness, I agree with you. Like I said before. 'Go in, get what you need and get out'. When I say 'Scientology' I refer to the body of knowledge applied by a group using that title (as distinguished from some data and other independents etc etc). You are wrong about Teril, I do not need his help. Ralph however, I have slowly grown to respect. He gives across some good data, sharp observations and trys new things. Alan, also I am finding has some excellent observations. He knows a lot more than he lets on. I have a greater understanding of why these two operate as they do.
My intuition told me who to trust and it has turned out to be true. I will never go against it in the future. Lesson learnt.
Teril,
When I suggested bringing the 2-D along at the end, you guys were very panicky about it. You were even shocked at my suggestion that someone out there had agreed to audit him? And now he's receiving auditing from the group?
[snip
.... Oh and M called me the other morning several times letting me know about getting auditing. It was not his usual tone. I detected something in the voice. After the meeting with you, I know he nearly threw the towel in on getting auditing. I am not suprised he is now receiving auditing from Victoria. The double sidedness of it all just stinks. (And not on his behalf either). You wanted absolutely nothing to do with M's 2-D, let alone him.
You view the world through multiple layers of conspiracy theories, eg considering the diamond on the IFA logo as being connected to weird stuff about Hitler thinking about crystals. Not to mention keys. You have shown that you view the world, scn, and the FZ through these various datums.
It amounts to fixed ideas.
He is quite a likable character once one gets used to his idiosyncrasies.
Don't worry about RolandRB
How else *can* it be done?
The last time I met Roland was in Munich nearly 10 years ago. Despite the watered down beer they serve to the English tourists I never saw him manage to drink more than 2 gallons.
The time before was in a pub a couple of doors down from the London org where he was telling me about his escapades in Space Opera.
He is quite a likable character once one gets used to his idiosyncrasies.
It is true that, to evaluate a datum one needs a datum of comparable magnitude. And, further, when new to a subject, there isn't really any choice but to use comparable data from outside that subject.
However, one can unknowingly use false data for the comparison.
And one can also simply bring too much bagage to the new subject. One of the more challenging aspects of learning a new subject is unlearning, or at least "leaving at home", an older similar subject.
Nick
Perhaps Scientologists should try to emulate chimpanzees. It seems from recent experiments done that they have better recall than humans so perhaps they are closer to being Clear.
That is a rather wide generalization from the actual experiment of, if I recall it correctly, teaching some young chimps the numbers 1-9, then showing a 3x3 grid containing the numbers in random order for 2/10 or 4/10 of a second then replacing the numbers with blank squares, and having the subject (chimp or college student) touch the squares in the order 1, 2, 3 etc. That chimp's mother did not out-perform the college students.
Not quite the same as recalling a time you were happy and telling the auditor about it.
I don't know about you, but I have found it quite embarrassing competing against 12 year olds in some mental contests.
Paul
Teril,
you were absolutely blown away from anyway actually wanting to audit this guy. That is from when I told you in Bente's kitchen. You didn't think anyone would ever take him. Neither C or C wanted anything to do with him. 'Wouldn't touch him with a bargepole' was one comment. 'I will never supervise him' was another. The Freezone can handle all cases? Is that antagonism? What about all those people that came along to Pembury who left due to a lack of delivery and ethics and left Pembury with no students or PC's? (AND THAT IS THE TRUTH. I picked up a lot from Student indicators and how that Dianetics Today course was being shoved down peoples throats). He did say 'put me on the cans, what have you got to lose?'
And now he is part of the group? I really like the guy, but as I said, I recognised a change in his voice when he left me voicemail and I decided not to respond, whereas I normally would. When I was emailing you suggesting just inviting his 2-D, the three of you (C&C2) were in fear and panicking and sending all sorts of back channel communications, only snippets of which I was privy to. It just shows the bare faced lying, social tone and two facedness that it takes to keeps PC's and student in the seat long enough to make the group seem apparently active until the next load of people are recycled.
[snip]
Trust you Teril to nullify everything down to something small and simple. I was pointing out the group history and psychology behind those symbols and the connections they have with the groups that carried the Scientology data prior to Hubbard and the theft of that data and very clear repositioning of the symbols. You said yourself the SO had approached the OTO for data. IFA through M.Moore has also put new age propaganda that very neatly hides the source of the tech (Zeitgeist) by nullifying several historical facts in the history of the tech (I know, as I carried the data in Egypt).
[snip]
.
You earlier commented on the Dianetics Today course as being from the Netherlands and being " Stuffed down" peoples throats.
It was an LRH book! Cancelled primarily because it had LRH C/Ses for those above clear for dianetics. The Dianetics data was as normal. It had an easy runway, of basic study manual, minimal meter drills, and basically the HSDC.
It was cancelled because LRH revised Dianetics in 1978 and developed a much more workable version. Why promote tech that doesn't work as well?
Terril! You keep on promoting anything that walks and talks. You show no ability to differentiate in the tech and almost zero understanding of it. You just blindly promote anything!
You are rapidly gaining a reputation as the village idiot and unfortunately tend to taint the whole FZ with your naivety.
Before you set foot on ars the FZ was not considered to be a bad thing.
Along comes old flat footed Terril with his bozo success stories and fucks up everything. Now, on ars, Terril represents the FZ with his PR bullshit. Same bullshit PR as the CofS.
Wonderful Freezone successes = 2 guys studying 5 hours every 2 weeks in Terril's bedroom and a part time taxi driver as an auditor occasionally. Can't even manage a TR's course in England so the guy from Channel 4 had to get on a slow train to Russia for his intro!
The UK FZ scene seems to consist mainly of cheapskates forever trying to scrounge everything as cheaply as possible while contributing as little as they can toward establishment.
I left the UK scene 10 years ago. Its only a short flight from Stanstead to Graz for those who actually want to make progress.
Well I have a success story to share today. My husband went clear today.
Thanks to everyone in the Freezone for keeping the porchlight on and the fires burning!
He is one keyed out happy man!
T.I.
Well I have a success story to share today. My husband went clear today.
Thanks to everyone in the Freezone for keeping the porchlight on and the fires burning!
He is one keyed out happy man!