What's new

The Pilot, Excerpts from his Writings

Re: Pilot's repost Z82 -- Common Base, Need for

Jens also wrote a little later (I follow it with the Scott Gordan contribution he is commenting on):

-


Hi Scott

Glad you like it.

Since you ask for input on grade III and change, I will give you some.

An ARC break is always a change (of ARC). Any change of importance can be an ARC break. It may not be bad, it can even be good (going uptone), yet it is an alter-is of an existing state of ARC, and the altering consideration, the "lie, can persist. Getting the prior condition can blow unwanted persistence.

ARC break assessment (as in ruds) is often wrongly understood, in that the focus is mistakenly on what breaks the ARC, not on the ARC that was broken. Yet the standard indication reads "I'd like to indicate there was a break in (e.g. understanding)". I.e. it was the prior understanding that was broken. Same on the second assesment, e.g. "I'd like to indicate there was a break in (desired understanding)". There was a desired understanding, and it was broken. Yet the way it was understood in the church (in my experience), was that that indication would mean that there was (good) ARC, and it was broken by a desired understanding. That could be the case, of course, for instance if the pc felt quite happy despising girls as a kid, then reached puberty and started to desire having an understanding with them and was confused; it could be correct. But what you want, and what the command asks for, is to get the ARC that existed before the break, which in the first example might be desired understanding which was broken because the pc was told he was stupid and gave up his desire, and in the second case might be being happy despising girls.

Filbert stresses the point implicitly by using the standard indication on the first part of the assessment (ARCU), but on the second (CDEI) he uses, "I'd like to indicate desired understanding was going on and broke off".

Having run ruds the correct way as a routine thing on the prior auditing, change in grade III makes sense as change of ARC, possibly ARC breaks, even in commands asking for changes in energy, space etc. If needed, one may run ARC breaks on various charged subjects in order to achieve the grade e.p. Anyhow, one should recover one's basic ARC of this lifetime - one's natural energy - before completing the grade.

ARC

Jens



> *** *** *** ***
> ***
> *** Message relayed to you by the SuperScio Internet list ***
> *** Bringing writings of the Pilot and comments on them ***
> *** *** *** ***
> **
> -
> -
> Awesome. Very helpful comments, Jens. Thanks.
>
> Points 1-3 about the Filbert-style Grades in particular. These I had
> not considered before.
>
> I still think a few of LRH's blind spots are embedded in a couple of
> the axioms. I will be working on this and will try elaborating in the
> future.
>
> Also, I note that Filbert also missed what LRH and nearly everyone that
> came after him missed. Grade III does not actually cover much for ARC
> breaks. Even the Expanded Grade has no more than 2-3 processes for it.
> 'Change' on the other hand, is well-covered.
>
> Any input on that is highly welcomed, as this is I think the most vital
> omission in all the Grades, and does deeply affect the workability of
> auditing as an overall product. It seems that by the time auditors,
> tech-finders, compilers, tabulators, etc. - (even preclears!) - get to
> this next-to-last Grade, they are I suppose, too tired to notice!
>
> Anyone else???
>
> (I find Alan Walter, Enid Vien and Hank Levin helpful on this as far as
> technique, theory and attention to the area, by the way, but these do
> not add repetitive processes for the Grade.)
>
> ARC
>
> Scott Gordon
> WATCHFUL NAVIGATOR
>​
 
Pilot's repost Z83 -- Summary of Research

-
Pilot's repost Z83

Summary of Research

From Post 65 – August 1999

Looking back at the way that one breakthrough was discarded
in favor of another within the CofS research line, I feel
that I had better emphasize that I think that all the work
is cumulative rather than one thing replacing another.

We have a huge subject to investigate. The puzzle is actually
larger than the physical universe because the physical universe
is only one of the pieces within the larger whole.

Think about how much is known in physics, chemistry, electronics,
computer science, and so forth, and then realize that the
sum total of those is a subset of what we are considering
when we talk about ultimate OT and the creation of universes.

You will not make it as an idiot. You will not make it by
a non-confront of details. You will not make it by being
too lazy to crack open a book. And you will not make it
by expecting somebody else to wave a magic wand over your
head.

But you will make it by the determination to understand and
use everything that you can lay your hands on and by having
the confidence that no matter what your current awareness
and abilities, you can grow to encompass anything and everything
that has ever been conceived of. There is no limit, for as
you grow, you increase your potential for growth.

To be a superman, you must make yourself into a superman,
but that is within your potential if only you will take on
the challenge and dedicate yourself to the task.

I think that sometimes people flinch at the sheer quantity
of material and the number of different factors which are
part of the picture. That is an unfortunate side effect
of trying to put all these things into context, because
the picture is big and complex.

But as you confront each factor, it loses its ability to
aberate you, and once it is done, then it is done. Although
these things often show up again at higher levels (more
grades after confronting the heavy force of implants etc.),
you will find that things are easy the second time once you
have gone through the work of that first difficult effort to
face up to the material.

So do not let the quantity of things get you down, the more
you do, the faster and easier it gets.


The Major Parts:

1) Grades type things. These are the basics and the reasons why.

2) Heavy patterned aberrations including implanted things
(things imposed by others) and heavy structures such as
actual GPMs which you postulated for yourself.

3)
Things related to beingness, whether entities or
fragments of oneself or "oversouls" or whatever.

4
) Present time, the physical universe, one's own universe,
etc. That which is real or mocked up right now.


Classes of "Implants" and Patterns

The heavy aberrations are patterns of one sort or another.
Sometimes they are implanted (imposed by others) and sometimes
they are postulated and lived by the person himself ("actuals").

There are four major styles and this seems like a good
time to summarize them. Note that many different things
exist within each style. These are general categories
rather than specifics.


1. Simple pictures, mockups, universes, etc. locked in by
aesthetics, interest, and other attractive factors.

These are of low aberative power because you can always
turn your back on them and step away.

For a current example, think of sex. People are attracted
and its fun but they can also (hopefully) step away by an
effort of will. This is not to claim that sex is or isn't
aberative or implanted, but simply to say that it is a
good example of an attractive nuisance where one has some
choice but often dives in.

At basic, all implants have to be anchored by things like
this, because nothing can impact a thetan up at the top
of the scale. But these are fairly easy to handle in
their pure form, the really aberative stuff has the high
level aesthetics buried so that it is hard to spot or depends
on aesthetics in earlier harder to reach implants.

These are the earliest, although you will find recent ones
too. Some of the recent between lives stuff is simply
attractive aesthetic pictures.

For an early example, see the chapter on Courage in Self
Clearing. We were tricked into mocking up strong opposition
because it was more aesthetic to be courageous fighting against
overwhelming odds. Just an aesthetic idea which gets you
into trouble.


2.
Simple Decay Scales

These are the next earliest on the track.

The best example are the penalty universes (Super Scio chapter 5)
which lay in the tone scale.

The weakness of these is based on the fact that even after
you are the effect of them, you can still move up and down
the scale because nothing blocks upward motion.

Anything you can get as a transient gain by raising somebody's
tone can be had as a permanent gain at any emotion by blowing
the damn scale. So that gives you an idea of how much
aberration is held by these kinds of things.

There are other decay scale type patterns, some more significant
and some less. Probably anything we can map out a scale for
has some fixed pattern setup somewhere.

Again, there will be recent examples as well as old ones.

But notice that just getting a person upscale doesn't make
a full OT. So these are not the full picture.


3. Opposition Patterns

Here is the realm of GPMs and things like that.

Instead of leaving the person free to move up and down scale,
each level is blocked by multiple points of charge so that
the person doesn't just back up.

There are implants and actuals and higher level patterns of
various sorts and quite a bit has been written about these
things.

Really anything with opposition and fixed viewpoints falls
into this category including earlier game type things
which predate the later more sophisticated GPM patterns.

Note that these are not effective until the being has decayed
to the point of wanting a game, they do not operate properly
if the being is free to create both sides causatively.

So these tend to be after Home Universe.

The liability of these things, from the implanter's perspective,
is that they cause declining spirals. Below a certain point,
an implanted slave or a population implanted into agreement
will cease to be able to do productive work.

4. Static Patterns

To make a permanent slave who does not decay in ability,
you need to hold him trapped at the same level instead of
going down in a zig zag.

Because of the basic of adding to the richness of creation,
it is not possible to hold anybody perpetually on one side
of a pattern. Eventually they will flip flop and create the
opposite and we have a GPM decay pattern.

To maintain a steady state, you have to let the being occupy
both sides of a pattern, but in a controlled manner so that
he cycles back to the first position again instead of
zig zagging downwards.

A number of things meet this criteria.

The Symbols Orientation stuff I just posted does it by
letting the person occupy either role (male and female for
example), but jamming the flow line so it sticks in one
direction.

The R7 triad cycles that I was talking about last time
also fit into this category by giving you brief moments
of controlled violations and then swinging you back into
line.

And the reality generators stuff I was talking about last
year do it by injecting both sides into a mockup (both
freedom and slavery for example) but with comm lags and
concurrent addition and removal.

All of these are characterized by creating long term No
Change while encouraging transient changes that keep taking
you back to where you were before.

Things setup this way permeate the current reality.

There may have been earlier things like this that permeated
earlier realities, but they must have been as-ised and are
no longer with us, because something like this will perpetuate
until it is as-ised.

===================

I still say that grades are basic.

Any time you loosen up one of the above heavy patterns,
more out grades stuff from the early track becomes visible
and accessible.

I tend to just stir the above things enough to get them
out of the way and go after the out grades stuff that
shows up. Everything later keeps getting weaker as you
continue to take charge off of the underpinnings.

Hope this helps,

The Pilot
_______________________________________________
 
Pilot's repost Z84 -- Home Universe Processing

.
Pilot's repost Z84

Home Universe Processing

From Post 65 – August 1999

[The Pilot wrote:]
FZ Bible recently posted a collection of 4th ACC tape transcripts.

These contain tons of group processing sessions. The 4th ACC
was the group processing ACC and had about 60 hours of group
processing that Ron did on the ACC students.

At the very end, after carrying the class up on a long
gradient, Ron runs the most fantastic process. I don't
think that you could use it on a group without this much
warm up, and it would probably be over a lot of people's
heads, but it is just fantastic and worth a special note.

I am going to excerpt a little bit of the session here,
but note that Ron does a lot more, bringing the students
up on a gradient, so you should really look at the original.

[quoting, presumably from alt.clearing.technology]
> Subject: FZ Bible SOME 4TH ACC TAPES 4/6
> 5403C26 4ACC-70 <1024> UNIVERSE SERIES: MORALS, LAWS, CODES

> Now find your own universe around you.
> Now find the physical universe around you.

> Now, what sort of a personal universe is acceptable to you? What
> sort of a your own universe? What condition would your own
> universe be in, that it would be acceptable to you? All messed
> up, exactly paralleling the physical universe? Beautiful
> condition? Well now, make up a lot of them and pull them in on
> you. One after the other. Doesn't come in easily[?], change it
> around 'til it does. Pull in a whole lot of them.

> Now let's find some places in your own universe where you are
> not.

>
> Now let's check over the physical universe for some places
> where you are not.

[Pilot writing:]
I got a fantastic gain while alternating that last pair of
commands.

Note that your own universe is just whatever space you mockup
and put things in. This is covered in the Philadelphia Doctorate
Course. You simply make a space that is not tied into physical
universe space (this is "Spaceation" - SOP 8 step 3) and start
doing mockups in it. I worked that into a number of spots in
Self Clearing.

A neat drill from the early ACCs is to mockup something in your
own space and then alternate between spotting something in that
space vs spotting things in the physical universe. Again, I've
done a lot of that and worked a bit of it into Self Clearing,
for example, mocking up a mountain and doing ext/int drills on
that as well as doing them on a physical universe mountain in
Chapter 11. That is a lot of fun.

Really, all the OT drills can be done both on physical universe
and on your own universe, and switching off between the two
gives interesting effects and great gains.

But it never occurred to me to try SOP 8C step 1 (finding places
where you are not, etc.) in this variation (own universe vs
physical universe).

My assumption (wrong in retrospect), was that I was obviously
everywhere in my own universe since I was mocking it up.

I should have known better.

We are mocking up tons of crap compulsively and not knowing it,
both in our own universes as well as the physical universe.

This drill can be done as soon as you reach the point where
it is fairly easy for you to mockup "your own universe" in
some vague manner.

You would begin by mocking up an acceptable personal universe.
It doesn't matter what, just lots of nice junk that gives
you good havingness. The drill of mocking up a mountain in
your own space in Chapter 11 of Self Clearing is a nice warm-up
for this, or the final process in Self Clearing where you
mockup a scene and step in and out of it.

We are not worried too much here about how real that personal
mockup is. It might be quite vague, but it should be stable
and under your control. Just fill it with whatever you feel
like at the moment, whether mountains or cities or bunches of
naked nymphs or whatever.

Then alternate -

a) spot some places in your own universe where you're not.
b) spot some places in the physical universe where you're not.

Something previously not-ised and compulsively created may
suddenly appear in your personal universe.

Whatever it is, copy it a number of times, changing its color
etc. to get control over it. See if you can spot when you
mocked it up and confront the incident. Get Itsa on it -
time, place, form, and event, and postulates, decisions, dones
to whatever degree necessary to get you back at cause over it.

It might seem like an external creation but it is not. This
is your own universe we are running here and it will definitely
be your own creation no matter how much you would like to offload
the responsibility onto some entity or whatever.

The rule is that nothing exists in your own universe that
you are not putting there. You can copy physical universe
stuff or crap from entities into your own universe, but it is
always you who is doing the copying and putting it there.

You have access to many spaces, including spaces created by
others or shared (like the physical universe), but when it
is a space that YOU mocked up, then it IS your space and
there is NO question of ownership.

When the mockup comes fully under your control and dissolves
(you can mock it up again if you feel like, but it is no
longer stuck there), you should get a big cog and see the
underlying postulate that you made and have continued to make
which was keeping that mockup in place. If not, then take
a break and check over it again a bit later or the next day.
This is a bit like power or ext/int where so much can come loose
that you need to let things settle out and look it over again
(usually done as a 2 way comm step on the following day in
professional handling).

The win on one of these old compulsive postulates coming loose
is so great that you have to let it settle out a bit. The
above process might not bite again for a few days, just going
to a mild win instead of revealing an old not-isness. You
can do other drills and come back around to this one.

Just as an example, I'll tell you what I hit the first
time I tried this.

There I had a nice little personal universe mocked up, and
was busily spotting places where I was not and suddenly I
found an old bedroom from when I was about 4 sitting right
there in my own universe. And I had a monster in it and
a feeling of fear. Silly, one would say, and nothing important.
But why was it sitting there in my own created space, having
come in automatically?

So I copied it a few times, getting at cause over mocking it
up. And suddenly a deep long standing postulate came into
view on the subject of fear. It wasn't something I'd thought
up when I was 4, it had only keyed in then. It was a stupid
idea that I had come up with way way back on the track and
simply been doing on automatic for a long time.

The idea was that if you are afraid, it attracts bad things.
This is the usual business of "the only thing to fear is
fear itself" and animals smelling your fear and going after
you only if you are afraid and so forth.

And my stupid solution was to keep myself from being afraid
by not-ising the thing I was afraid of. In other words,
if you hide it from yourself, then you aren't afraid and
will not pull in the bad things which come from being afraid.

So I had mocked up a mechanism to blanket something with
invisibility and stop myself from thinking about it to
turn off fear. And at age 4 I had triggered that mechanism to
suppress a fear at a supposed monster hiding in the bedroom.

The result was copying the entire not-ised scene into my
own universe, because you do that when you not-is things
so that you wouldn't completely loose track of them.

Tons of stuff started unravelling when I hit this.

The huge gain was not the one little incident, but the
whole mechanism coming into view and things starting to
show up and dissolve in all directions. Just wild.

It feels like a whole basic core of fear from up and down
the track is just gone.

But that is only one potential gain from this process.

Theoretically, all of one's compulsive creates might
come into view, step by step on a gradient, with this
process. But I'm far from done with this one, so we
will see.

Affinity,

The Pilot
_______________________________________________
 

Free Being Me

Crusader
Instead of Elcon's Mystical Magic Ouija Board a la Pilot...

mysterious-ouija-talking-board.jpg


some cult recovery may prove more beneficial instead of Elcon's [STRIKE]unworkable "tek"[/STRIKE] mind control

bookReleasing.jpg


or even Harry Houdini's book may offer some insight.

miracle_mongers_and_their_methods.jpg
 
What is this self concocted kool aid of yours that inspires lol's and wtf's about cult recovery?

It's just that...

I do not understand why you would feel it necessary to crash an innocent 'hobby' thread, that does not forward the Hubbard cult in any way.

Do you know about the Pilot?

The Pilot had Miscavige foaming at the mouth.

He criticized the church. He criticized Hubbard.

He lured people away from the cult with harmless applications of the Hubbard tech they did not have to mortgage their houses for.

So your intrusion (preaching to the already converted) kind of baffles me.

So I say - WTF?

We're just playing around with philosophy here - not hurting anyone.

Your turn to explain why you did that - if you like. If not, cool.

I am doing my share to whistleblow the cult, as you should already know.

I do like the tech when it is not shoved down anyone's throat.

It is just a look at various relationships in life and some people derive benefit from it.

I used it (and Pilot's versions helped) to deprogram myself and slip out of the cult, taking others with me along the way.

Hope that explains some things.
 

Free Being Me

Crusader
It's just that...

I do not understand why you would feel it necessary to crash an innocent 'hobby' thread, that does not forward the Hubbard cult in any way.

Do you know about the Pilot?

The Pilot had Miscavige foaming at the mouth.

He criticized the church. He criticized Hubbard.

He lured people away from the cult with harmless applications of the Hubbard tech they did not have to mortgage their houses for.

So your intrusion (preaching to the already converted) kind of baffles me.

So I say - WTF?

We're just playing around with philosophy here - not hurting anyone.

Your turn to explain why you did that - if you like. If not, cool.

I am doing my share to whistleblow the cult, as you should already know.

I do like the tech when it is not shoved down anyone's throat.

It is just a look at various relationships in life and some people derive benefit from it.

I used it (and Pilot's versions helped) to deprogram myself and slip out of the cult, taking others with me along the way.

Hope that explains some things.

Irregardless of being in Elcon's $cientology church or an [STRIKE]In[/STRIKE]dependent $cientologist promoting the so called tek or even claiming to fix it it, that's been going on for decades with no positive results. It's all based on lolly pop pseudo science fiction with heavy doses of psychological manipulation for the express purpose of cognitively dissociating a person into delusional state called splitting resulting in a carefully crafted cultist identity.

I have no idea who you are so claiming I should be vouching for your whistle-blowing while your defending the tek is ridiculous. Psychological manipulation based on Elcon's or the spuriously named Guru, The Pilot, who committed suicide by the way isn't a hobby as you claim it to be, it's an injustice and certainly not a philosophy anymore than deception is. No clears or oat tees, no such thing as a reactive mind or an engram, no psychosomatic ills cured, just hocus pocus drivel to entice people that the tek works or it will work. That's not cult recovery, it's recovering people back into Elcon's wishful thinking dementia.

My "intrusion" as you call it is nothing of the sort, I'm free to post on any thread on the board as any member can. I disagree with the tek, it's the insidious core of $cientology, it was never supposed to work, it doesn't work, at least not to those programmed to still "make it go right" are hoping it does. Call this a P.S.A. offered to those passing by still trying to figure what happened to themselves being in $cientology while beginning to have healthy doubts about the cult and it's tek. $cientology is a spiritual/mental/emotional rape just like any cult is.

If you're going to whistle blow or self deprogram, research psychological manipulation and the value of cult recovery, you might learn a lot.

Coming Out Of Scientology

8 Steps Out Of Scientology
http://www.lermanet.com/cos/8steps.html
Charismatic Authority
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charismatic_authority
Dangerous Cult Leaders
http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/spycatcher/201208/dangerous-cult-leaders
Identifying Marks Of An Exploitive, Abusive Group
http://www.exitsupportnetwork.com/artcls/mindctrl/marks.htm
Jon Atack - Why It’s So Hard To Recover From Scientology
http://tonyortega.org/2013/06/08/jon-atack-on-why-its-so-hard-to-recover-from-scientology/
Post-Cult Problems: An Exit Counselor's Perspective
http://www.icsahome.com/infoserv_articles/giambalvo_carol_postcult_problems.htm
Profile Of A Sociopath - Cult Leaders
http://www.exitsupportnetwork.com/artcls/socio.htm
The Scientological Onion
http://exscn.net/content/view/178/105/

Steve Hassan - Freedom Of Mind
http://freedomofmind.com/index.php
Mind Control – The BITE Model
http://www.freedomofmind.com/Info/BITE/bitemodel.php#behavior

510WGUE4q%2BL._AA160_.jpg

Combatting Cult Mind Control: The #1 Best-selling Guide to Protection, Rescue, and Recovery From Destructive Cults
http://www.amazon.com/Combatting-Cu..._B000APQYV4_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1370833779&sr=1-1

51AZmxAEdNL._BO2,204,203,200_PIsitb-sticker-arrow-click,TopRight,35,-76_AA300_SH20_OU01_.jpg

Freedom of Mind: Helping Loved Ones Leave Controlling People, Cults, and Beliefs
http://www.amazon.com/Freedom-Mind-...=1370833589&sr=1-5&keywords=ex+scientologists

51RMZE5EFZL._AA160_.jpg

Releasing the Bonds: Empowering People to Think for Themselves
http://www.amazon.com/Releasing-Bon...bs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1210702476&sr=8-1
Books On Cult Mind Control
http://www.xenu.net/archive/books/cult_etc.html

Cult Recovery Tools

Finding a Therapist Who Can Help You Heal
http://www.helpguide.org/mental/psychotherapy_therapist_counseling.htm
5 Things to Do When You Feel Insecure
http://psychcentral.com/blog/archives/2013/06/08/5-things-to-do-when-you-feel-insecure/
CCI Self Help Modules
http://www.cci.health.wa.gov.au/resources/consumers.cfm
Cognitive Reframing
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognitive_reframing
Cognitive Reframing - Change Your Thinking
http://www.positive-thinking-principles.com/cognitive-reframing.html
Cognitive Restructuring
http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/in-practice/201301/cognitive-restructuring
Cognitive Restructuring Aids
http://www.psychologytools.org/cognitive-restructuring.html
Cognitive Theory and Addiction (Thoughts, Beliefs, Expectations)
http://www.dekcsb.org/1408-addictio...y-and-addiction-thoughts-beliefs-expectations
Empathy
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Empathy
Emotional Intelligence
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emotional_intelligence
Emotional Wellness
http://wellness.ucr.edu/emotional_wellness.html
Facing Your Feelings
http://www.cci.health.wa.gov.au/resources/infopax.cfm?Info_ID=54
Fear, Obligation, and Guilt (FOG)
http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog...ear-obligation-and-guilt-fog-in-relationships
Finding Time for Truly Nurturing Yourself
http://psychcentral.com/blog/archives/2012/10/14/finding-time-for-truly-nurturing-yourself/
Healing Emotional and Psychological Trauma
http://www.helpguide.org/mental/emotional_psychological_trauma.htm
Hierarchy of Needs - Abraham Maslow
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abraham_Maslow
New to Mindfulness? How to Get Started
http://psychcentral.com/blog/archives/2013/06/03/new-to-mindfulness-how-to-get-started/
Personal Boundaries
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personal_boundaries
Personal Core Values And Positive Beliefs
http://www.inspired-personal-development.com/personal-core-values.html
Personal Core Values List
http://www.mypersonalimprovement.com/personalcorevalues.shtml
Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posttraumatic_stress_disorder
Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Worksheets & Handouts
http://www.psychologytools.org/ptsd.html
Psychology Tools - Free Worksheet Downloads And Therapy Resources
http://www.psychologytools.org/
Self-Compassion
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-compassion
Self-Compassion, A Healthier Way of Relating to Yourself (Videos at link)
http://www.self-compassion.org/
Self Development Recovery Techniques
http://www.empowering-personal-development.com/self-development.html
Self-Esteem
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-esteem
Self-Esteem Improvement
http://www.cci.health.wa.gov.au/docs/SE_Module 6_July 05.pdf
Self-Image
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self_image
Self Soothe - Distress Tolerance Strategies
http://www.dbtselfhelp.com/html/self-sooth.html
The Path To Unconditional Self Acceptance
http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/evolution-the-self/200809/the-path-unconditional-self-acceptance
The Power of Patience
http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/emotional-freedom/201209/the-power-patience
The 5 Stages Of Loss And Grief
http://psychcentral.com/lib/2006/the-5-stages-of-loss-and-grief/
Traumatic Bonding
http://victimsofpsychopaths.wordpress.com/traumatic-bonding/
Emotional Attachments in Abusive Relationships: A Test of Traumatic Bonding Theory - PDF (Dutton and Painter)
http://lab.drdondutton.com/wp-conte...SHIPS-A-TEST-OF-TRAUMATIC-BONDING-THEORY..pdf

Brené Brown - Listening To Shame (TED Talk)
[video=youtube;L0ifUM1DYKg]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L0ifUM1DYKg[/video]

Brené Brown: The Power Of Vulnerability (TED Talk)
[video=youtube;iEPbkvhPuRk]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iEPbkvhPuRk[/video]

Jack Kornfield - Compassion
[video=youtube;I0V3gNf6Ccc]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I0V3gNf6Ccc[/VIDEO]

Jack Kornfield - The Ancient Heart Of Forgiveness
[video=youtube;yiRP-Q4mMtk]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yiRP-Q4mMtk[/video]

Karla McLaren - The Language Of Emotions
[video=youtube;hVjltYNgU6s]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hVjltYNgU6s[/video]

Kristin Neff - The Space Between Self-Esteem and Self Compassion
[video=youtube;IvtZBUSplr4]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IvtZBUSplr4[/video]

Eckhart Tolle - Conversations On Compassion
[video=youtube;M00VLswZdyc]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M00VLswZdyc[/video]

Informative Sites

Ex-Scientologist Message Board
http://www.forum.exscn.net/forum.php
Ex-Scientology Kids
http://exscientologykids.com/
Ex-Sea Org
https://sites.google.com/site/xseaorg/
Lermanet
http://www.lermanet.com/
Mark Bunker - YouTube
http://www.youtube.com/user/xenutv?feature=results_main
Operation Clambake
http://www.xenu.net/
Reaching For The Tipping Point
http://www.reachingforthetippingpoint.net/
Surviving Scientology - YouTube
http://www.youtube.com/user/SurvivingScientology
The Underground Bunker
http://tonyortega.org/
Tory Speaking Freely - YouTube
http://www.youtube.com/ToryMagoo44
Why We Protest
https://whyweprotest.net/community/
World Cult Watch
http://worldcultwatch.org/

Ex-Scientology Books
(Available at libraries and other outlets)

A Piece of Blue Sky: Scientology, Dianetics and L. Ron Hubbard Exposed - Jon Atack
http://www.amazon.com/Piece-Blue-Sk...32747&sr=1-1&keywords=a+piece+of+the+blue+sky
Bare-faced Messiah: True Story of L.Ron Hubbard - Russell Miller
http://www.amazon.com/Bare-faced-Me...1370834396&sr=1-1&keywords=bare+faced+messiah
Beyond Belief: My Secret Life Inside Scientology and My Harrowing Escape - Jenna Miscavige
http://www.amazon.com/Beyond-Belief-Jenna-M-Hill/dp/0062263439/
Blown for Good: Behind the Iron Curtain of Scientology - Marc Headley
http://www.amazon.com/Blown-Good-Cu...70832850&sr=1-1-spell&keywords=blwon+for+good
Counterfeit Dreams: One Man's Journey Into and Out of the World of Scientology - Jefferson Hawkins
http://www.amazon.com/Counterfeit-Dreams-Journey-World-Scientology/dp/0615375642/ref=tmm_hrd_title_0
Going Clear: Scientology, Hollywood, and the Prison of Belief - Lawrence Wright
http://www.amazon.com/Going-Clear-Scientology-Hollywood-Prison/dp/0307700666/ref=pd_sim_b_4
Inside Scientology: The Story of America's Most Secretive Religion - Janet Reitman
http://www.amazon.com/Inside-Scient...70832850&sr=1-2-spell&keywords=blwon+for+good
L. Ron Hubbard: Messiah or Madman - Bent Corydon
http://www.amazon.com/L-Ron-Hubbard-Messiah-Madman/dp/0942637577/ref=pd_sim_sbs_b_3
My Billion Year Contract: Memoir of a Former Scientologist - Nancy Many
http://www.amazon.com/My-Billion-Year-Contract-Scientologist/dp/0578039222/ref=pd_sim_b_1
Scientology: Abuse At the Top - Amy Scobee
http://www.amazon.com/Scientology-A...r=1-1&keywords=Scientology+-+Abuse+At+the+Top
The Church of Fear: Inside The Weird World of Scientology - John Sweeney
http://www.amazon.com/Church-Fear-I...d=1370833309&sr=1-13&keywords=lawrence+wright
The Complex: An Insider Exposes the Covert World of the Church of Scientology - John Duignan
http://www.amazon.com/The-Complex-Insider-Exposes-Scientology/dp/1903582849/ref=pd_sim_sbs_b_18
The Scandal of Scientology - Paulette Cooper
http://www.amazon.com/The-scandal-scientology-Tower-book/dp/B0007AF8KA

Cult Recovery Concepts To Contrast

Abuse
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abuse
Bait-and-Switch
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bait-and-switch
Betrayal
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betrayal
Cognitive Bias
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognitive_bias
Cognitive Dissonance
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognitive_dissonance
Cognitive Distortion
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognitive_distortion
Coping (psychology)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coping_(psychology)
Critical thinking
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critical_thinking
Deception
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deception
Denial
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Denial
Disinformation
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disinformation
Dissociation (psychology)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dissociation_(psychology)
Double Bind
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double_bind
Double Standard
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double_standard
Emotional Blackmail
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emotional_blackmail
Emotional Detachment
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emotional_detachment
False Dilemma
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_dilemma
Gaslighting
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaslighting
Groupthink
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Groupthink
Hypnosis
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypnosis
Identity (social science)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Identity_(social_science)
Indoctrination
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indoctrination
Loaded Language
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loaded_language
Locus Of Control
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Locus_of_control
Love Bombing
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Love_bombing
Magical Thinking
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magical_thinking
Milieu Control
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milieu_control
Narcissism
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Narcissistic
Operant Conditioning
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operant_conditioning
Peer Pressure
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peer_pressure
Propaganda
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propaganda
Psychological Abuse
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychological_abuse
Psychological Manipulation
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychological_manipulation
Self-Deception
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-deception
Self-Help
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-help
Self-Serving Bias
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-serving_bias
Shunning
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shunning
Social Isolation
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_isolation
Stockholm Syndrome
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stockholm_syndrome
Wishful Thinking
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wishful_thinking

Observable Behaviors & Tools Used By Manipulators (Collected Posts)

Sociopath (Antisocial personality disorder)
http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/antisocial-personality-disorder/DS00829/DSECTION=symptoms
Definition
Antisocial personality disorder is a type of chronic mental condition in which a person's ways of thinking, perceiving situations and relating to others are dysfunctional — and destructive. People with antisocial personality disorder typically have no regard for right and wrong and often disregard the rights, wishes and feelings of others.

Those with antisocial personality disorder tend to antagonize, manipulate or treat others either harshly or with callous indifference. They may often violate the law, landing in frequent trouble, yet they show no guilt or remorse. They may lie, behave violently or impulsively, and have problems with drug and alcohol use. These characteristics typically make people with antisocial personality disorder unable to fulfill responsibilities related to family, work or school.

Symptoms
  • Disregard for right and wrong
  • Persistent lying or deceit to exploit others
  • Using charm or wit to manipulate others for personal gain or for sheer personal pleasure
  • Intense egocentrism, sense of superiority and exhibitionism
  • Recurring difficulties with the law
  • Repeatedly violating the rights of others by the use of intimidation, dishonesty and misrepresentation
  • Child abuse or neglect
  • Hostility, significant irritability, agitation, impulsiveness, aggression or violence
  • Lack of empathy for others and lack of remorse about harming others
  • Unnecessary risk-taking or dangerous behaviors
  • Poor or abusive relationships
  • Irresponsible work behavior
  • Failure to learn from the negative consequences of behavior

Psychopath
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/psychopath
Definition
A person with an antisocial personality disorder, manifested in aggressive, perverted, criminal, or amoral behavior without empathy or remorse.

Narcissism
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Narcissism
Definition
Narcissism is a term that originated with Narcissus in Greek mythology who fell in love with his own image reflected in a pool of water. Currently it is used to describe the pursuit of gratification from vanity, or egotistic admiration of one's own physical or mental attributes, that derive from arrogant pride.

Symptoms
  • An obvious self-focus in interpersonal exchanges
  • Problems in sustaining satisfying relationships
  • A lack of psychological awareness (see insight in psychology and psychiatry, egosyntonic)
  • Difficulty with empathy
  • Problems distinguishing the self from others (see narcissism and boundaries)
  • Hypersensitivity to any insults or imagined insults (see criticism and narcissists, narcissistic rage and narcissistic injury)
  • Vulnerability to shame rather than guilt
  • Haughty body language
  • Flattery towards people who admire and affirm them (narcissistic supply)
  • Detesting those who do not admire them (narcissistic abuse)
  • Using other people without considering the cost of doing so
  • Pretending to be more important than they really are
  • Bragging (subtly but persistently) and exaggerating their achievements
  • Claiming to be an "expert" at many things
  • Inability to view the world from the perspective of other people
  • Denial of remorse and gratitude

Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD)
http://outofthefog.net/Disorders/NPD.html
(Click link for full article)

Traumatic Bonding
http://victimsofpsychopaths.wordpress.com/traumatic-bonding/
Traumatic bonding is “strong emotional ties that develop between two persons where one person intermittently harasses, beats, threatens, abuses, or intimidates the other.” (Dutton & Painter, 1981). Several conditions have been identified that must be present for a traumatic bond to occur.

–(1). There must be an imbalance of power, with one person more in control of key aspects of the relationship, such as setting themselves up as the “authority” through such things as controlling the finances, or making most of the relationship decisions, or using threats and intimidations, so the relationship has become lopsided.

–(2). The abusive behavior is sporadic in nature. It is characterized by intermittent reinforcement, which means there is the alternating of highly intense positives (such as intense kindness or affection) and the negatives of the abusive behavior.

–(3). The victim engages in denial of the abuse for emotional self- protection. In severe abuse (this can be psychological or physical), one form of psychological protection strategy is dissociation, where the victim experiences the abuse as if it is not happening to them, but as if they are outside their body watching the scene unfold (like watching a movie). Dissociative states allow the victim to compartmentalize the abusive aspects of the relationship in order to focus on the positive aspects.

The use of denial and distancing oneself from the abuse are forms of what is called cognitive dissonance. In abusive relationships this means that what is happening to the victim is so horrible, so far removed from their thoughts and expectations of the world, that it is “dissonant” or “out of tune” or “at odds” with their pre-existing expectations and reality.

Since the victim feels powerless to change the situation, they rely on emotional strategies to try to make it less dissonant, to try to somehow make it fit. To cope with the contradicting behaviors of the abuser, and to survive the abuse, the person literally has to change how they perceive reality.

Studies also show a person is more loyal and committed to a person or situation that is difficult, uncomfortable, or even humiliating, and the more the victim has invested in the relationship, the more they need to justify their position. Cognitive dissonance is a powerful “self-preservation” mechanism which can completely distort and override the truth, with the victim developing a tolerance for the abuse and “normalizing” the abusers behavior, despite evidence to the contrary.

–(4). The victim masks that the abuse is happening, may not have admitted it to anyone, not even themselves.

Trauma bonding makes it easier for a victim to survive within the relationship, but it severely undermines the victims self-structures, undermining their ability to accurately evaluate danger, and impairs their ability to perceive of alternatives to the situation.

Once a trauma bond is established it becomes extremely difficult for the victim to break free of the relationship. The way humans respond to trauma is thought to have a biological basis and reactions to trauma was first described a century ago, with the term “railroad spine” being used. Another term used has been “shell shocked”.

Victims overwhelmed with terror suffer from an overload of their system, and to be able to function they must distort reality. They often shut down emotionally, and sometimes later describe themselves as having felt “robotic”, intellectually knowing what happened, but feeling frozen or numb and unable to take action. A victim must feel safe and out of “survival mode” before they will be able to make cognitive changes.

Many victims feel the compulsion to tell and retell the events of the trauma in an attempt to come to terms with what happened to them and to try to integrate it, reaching out to others for contact, safety, and stability. Other victims react in an opposite manner, withdrawing into a shell of self-imposed isolation. The trauma bond can persist even after the victim leaves the relationship, with it sometimes taking months, or even years, for them to completely break the bond.

Emotional Attachments in Abusive Relationships: A Test of Traumatic Bonding Theory - PDF (Dutton and Painter)
http://lab.drdondutton.com/wp-conte...SHIPS-A-TEST-OF-TRAUMATIC-BONDING-THEORY..pdf

7073663-M.jpg


Fear, Obligation, and Guilt (FOG) in Relationships
http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog...ear-obligation-and-guilt-fog-in-relationships
According to Susan Forward, Ph.D. (Forward and Frazier 1997), emotional blackmail is a “powerful form of manipulation in which people close to us threaten, directly or indirectly, to punish us if we don’t do what they want." The main tool of the trade, Forward says, is FOG: fear, obligation, and guilt.

People with borderline or narcissistic personality disorder may use emotional blackmail because it’s the best or the only way they know to get what they want or need. Unwilling or unable to make a direct request, FOG becomes the lever of choice to those who suffer from low self-esteem and have difficulty setting personal limits and stating what they want. Victims capitulate because they often possess these same qualities. And perpetrators use whatever works again and again. (Full article at link)

Out of the FOG - What is FOG
http://outofthefog.net/CommonNonBehaviors/FOG.html
FOG - Fear, Obligation & Guilt - The acronym FOG, for Fear, Obligation and Guilt, was first coined by Susan Forward & Donna Frazier in Emotional Blackmail and describes feelings that a person often has when in a relationship with someone who suffers from a personality disorder. (Full article at link)

Covert Emotional Manipulation Tactics
http://psychopathsandlove.com/covert-emotional-manipulation-tactics/

Covert emotional manipulation tactics are underhanded methods of control. Emotional manipulation methodically wears down your sense of self-worth, self-confidence, self-concept and trust in your own perceptions. At its worst, you can lose all sense of self and your personal values.

Positive Reinforcement: Praise, flattery, adoration, attention, affection, gifts, superficial sympathy (crocodile tears), superficial charm, recognition, appreciation, intense sex, and declarations of once-in-a-lifetime love. When all of these are present continually at the beginning of the relationship with no negative behavior in sight, it’s called “love-bombing,” and it’s designed to hook us deeply and bond us tightly to our abuser.

Intermittent positive reinforcement: This is a very effective manipulation tactic, one abusers use to great effect. Intermittent positive reinforcement occurs when your relationship goes from nonstop positive reinforcement to only getting attention, appreciation, praise, adoration, declarations of love, etc. once in a while, on a random basis. This will create a climate of doubt, fear and anxiety. You’ll know he’s withdrawing and you’ll fear you’re losing him, but he’ll deny it. This replays over and over until you’re riding and emotional roller coaster, with no way to stop the ride and get off. S/He is doing this on purpose to increase his power and control over you and to make you even more desperate for his love. You have become the proverbial lab rat frantically pushing the lever for a randomly dispensed treat. The rat thinks of nothing else, and neither will you. The bond can become even stronger during this phase, believe it or not. It’s a well-known psychological phenomenon known as traumatic bonding.

Negative reinforcement: The manipulator stops performing a negative behavior (such as giving you the silent treatment) when you comply with his demands.
Not allowing negative emotion: The victim is typically chastised for emotional behavior. The focus is put on the emotional upset itself, not the cause behind it (which conveniently takes the focus off of him). He refuses to hear what it is she wants to talk about. The only subject is her emotion, which is unacceptable; in fact, it’s an issue she needs to work on, and one he finds unattractive.The silent treatment usually follows, which increases her frustration at not being able to express her thoughts and feelings.

Indirect aggressive abuse: Name-calling is direct and obvious, but an underhanded way to make it much less obvious is to drop the angry tone of voice that usually accompanies it, and disguise the insult as teaching, helping, giving advice, or offering solutions. It appears to be a sincere attempt to help, but it’s actually an attempt to belittle, control and demean you, and you will sense this.

Manipulators share intimate information about themselves, their lives and families early on to create a false sense of intimacy. You’ll automatically feel obliged or free to respond, and afterward you’ll trust him more and feel closer to him. Later, you’ll find out most of what he disclosed wasn’t true, and that he’ll use everything you told him about yourself to manipulate you or hurt you.

Triangulation: This is a common and effective tactic of a psychopath’s covert emotional manipulation. The manipulator introduces other women into the relationship in any way he can — by talking about a woman at work, talking about his ex girlfriends, flirting with other women in front of you, or comparing you unfavorably to another woman — just to hurt you, knock you off balance and make you jealous. In a normal relationship, a man will go out of his way to prove he’s trustworthy. The manipulator does just the opposite, and he enjoys watching your pain and angst. He is usually grooming his next target, who he conveniently uses to manipulate you devalue you.

Blaming the victim: This tactic is a powerful means of putting the victim on the defense while simultaneously masking the aggressive intent of the abuser. This usually happens when she questions him about something he wants to hide (such as his involvement with another woman). The victim finds herself put in the defensive mode, and she can’t win. He tells her that her concerns are rooted in her problem with “insecurity” and have nothing to do with his behavior or with reality, and that he finds her insecurity very unattractive. Since this is very unpleasant she learns not to question him, and silently puts up with his bad behavior in the future.

The manipulator will make carefully chosen insinuating comments to evoke an uncomfortable emotional response or even several responses at once. He knows your weaknesses and your hot-buttons, and he will enjoy dropping a bomb like this and watching the fallout. If someone says something that has multiple negative meanings and causes negative emotions while leaving you flummoxed and without a meaningful response, you’ve experienced it.

Empty words: The abuser can turn on the charm and tell you exactly what you want to hear: “I love you,” “you’re so special to me,” “you’re so important to me,” etc. The problem is they are just words, backed up by nothing. Filling your need for approval, validation, and reassurance with these empty words gives him incredible power over you.

Denying/ Invalidating reality: Invalidating distorts or undermines the victim’s perceptions of their world. Invalidating occurs when the abuser refuses or will not acknowledge reality. For example, if the victim confronts the abuser about an incident of name calling, the abuser may insist, “I never said that,” “I don’t know what you’re talking about.” The same as gaslighting, really, a tactic which is explained below.

Minimizing: The manipulator will tell you you’re making a big deal out of nothing or that you’re “exaggerating” when you confront him with something he’s done.

Withholding: Includes refusing to communicate, refusing to listen, and using emotionally withdrawal as punishment. This is commonly called the “silent treatment.”

Lying: It’s often difficult to know when someone’s lying, but psychopaths are pathological liars who will say anything to get what they want. You may notice they lie so much they can’t keep the details straight. If you question them, they revert to denial.

Lies of omission: A more subtle form of lying where a truth is left out if it’s not convenient.

Gaslighting: An especially frustrating manipulation tactic where you know you heard him say something or saw him do something but when you confront him, he simply denies it. It seems obvious enough but if it’s repeated often, victims can begin to question their “version” of reality. We also want to believe whatever it was didn’t happen, so we may let this absurdity slip by. I forget who said “words are more real than reality,” but that sums it up.

Projecting the Blame: Nothing is ever a psychopath’s fault, and he will always find some crafty way to find a scapegoat
.
Diversion and Evasion: When you ask the psychopath a question, instead of answering it he may use diversion (steering the conversation to another topic) or evasion (giving an irrelevant, vague and often rambling response).

Selective forgetting: The manipulator pretends he forgot something important he once said. If you feel the need to use a tape recorder when speaking with someone, covert emotional manipulation is at play.

Refusing to take responsibility for his behavior, for the relationship or for your reactions to it.

Attempts to turn the tables and make you look like the abuser: These skilled manipulators have an arsenal of tactics at their disposal, and they will be pushing as many buttons as possible to get you to lose control. They can inflict so much psychological warfare and make you suppress so much emotion that you can be backed into an emotional corner. When this happens, the intense frustration you feel, but can’t express through normal communication, will cause you to react in self-defense. Emotional reactions in self-defense to an abusive situation do not make you an abuser.

Diminishing and belittling your opinions and ideas non-verbally by using eye-rolls, scoffs, smug smiles, etc. There are plenty of variations.

Hypnotism and trance induction: This is the most powerful manipulation tool a psychopath uses with his victim, and is related to charm. The technique of hypnosis comes naturally to the psychopath, and he mesmerizes his victim to gain emotional control. Hypnosis and trance are the “attraction heat, attachment magnet and bonding glue,” according to Sandra L. Brown, M.A., author of “Women Who Love Psychopaths.” (*This tactic applies only to psychopaths; the rest on this list are also used by all types of manipulators as well as psychopaths.)


What is Psychological Manipulation?
http://www.bandbacktogether.com/psychological-manipulation-resources/

Psychological Manipulation is a type of influence that attempts to change the behavior or perception of others through underhanded, deceptive and abusive techniques. This advances the interests of the manipulator, generally at the victim's expense, in methods that may be considered abusive, devious, deceptive, and exploitative.

In order to be successful, the art of manipulation involves two things - concealing aggressive or subversive intentions and behaviors while knowing the psychological vulnerabilities of the victim well enough to know what will be the most effective psychological weapons or tactics to be used against them. This is most often accomplished through covert-aggression or carefully veiled aggression - which may be so subtle that it's not easily detected.

Psychological Manipulators know what they want and fight hard to get it.

The tactics Psychological Manipulators use are very effective methods of power and control, because they're almost impossible to be seen as aggressive on the surface, at the unconscious level, the victim feels backed into the corner. Once a victim is backed into a corner, it is more likely that they'll back down or give into the manipulator's demands.

Why Do People Manipulate?

There are many motivations behind manipulation - as varied as the manipulators themselves. Perhaps the manipulator needs to gain something purposefully or feels that they have to advance their own causes or plans - no matter what the cost to others may be. Maybe they need to feel powerful and in-control of their relationships with others. Maybe feeling powerful over others increases their own self-esteem. Maybe the person does not have the social skills to obtain what is wanted or needed by traditional means. Some Psychological Manipulators are psychopathic, having trouble empathizing with or understanding the feelings of themselves or others, and placing their own desires foremost because of it.

How Do Manipulators Manipulate?

There are many techniques that manipulators can use to gain power and control over their victim. Here is a breakdown of some manipulation techniques.

Brandishing Anger - manipulators use anger and rage to shock their victims into submission, although real anger is not necessarily experienced by the manipulator. The anger is simply a show to get whatever he or she wants by cowing the victim into submission.

Covert Intimidation - The victim is thrown on the defensive by the manipulator using subtle, indirect, or implied threats.

Denial - The manipulator refuses to admit that he or she has done anything wrong.

Diversion - Rather than giving a straight answer, the manipulator will often change the subject, often without the change being noticed.

Feigning Confusion - The manipulator plays dumb - pretending she or he has no idea what the victim is talking about, or is confused by the topic at hand.

Feigning Innocence - The manipulator suggests that anything harmful was done unintentionally or that it didn't happen. This makes the victim question their judgement and/or sanity in feeling hurt or betrayed.

Evasion - Providing vague, rambling, incoherent responses to the victim. This often leads to confusion over the matter at hand, as well as making it less likely that the victim will be inclined to pursue further conversations on the topic.

Gaslighting - A form of psychological abuse involving the manipulation of situations or events that cause a person to be confused or to doubt his perceptions and memories. Gaslighting causes victims to constantly second-guess themselves and wonder if they're losing their minds.

Guilt-Tripping - The manipulator suggests to a conscientious victim that he or she doesn't care enough, is too selfish, or has it easy. The victim generally feels guilt or shame as a result, and is thrown into a submissive, anxious, and self-doubting state.

Lying - By the time the truth is apparent, it may be too late to do anything about it. Many manipulative personality types are experts at lying and may do so in subtle ways that are hard to detect.

Lies of Omission - This is lying by withholding a part of the truth, usually with the intention of making something seem innocuous, or less harmful than it really was.

Minimization - The manipulator asserts that his or her behavior is not as harmful as is suggested.

Lying - By the time the truth is apparent, it may be too late to do anything about it. Many manipulative personality types are experts at lying and may do so in subtle ways that are hard to detect.


Projecting the Blame - Scapegoating in subtle ways, blaming the victim or other people for the negative actions or consequences of their actions. This helps to portray the manipulator in a more positive light, and can actively harm the victim's relationships with other people, who may not even have been involved.

Rationalization - An excuse from the manipulator for inappropriate behavior. Rationalization involves giving reasons as to why their behavior was justified and appropriate. When coupled with Guilt-Trips or Scapegoating, the manipulator will often wind up looking like a victim, evoking sympathy from the real victim.

Seduction - Using charm, praise, or flattery to lower the defenses of the victim so that the manipulator gains trust and loyalty.

Shaming - Sarcasm and insults can be used by the manipulator to increase self-doubt and fear in the victim, to make the victim feel unworthy. This may be accomplished by anything from a very subtle fierce look or unpleasant tone of voice to a rhetorical comment. This may make the victim feel badly for daring to challenge them, which also fosters a sense of inadequacy in the victim.

Vilifying the Victim - A powerful method of putting the victim on the defensive while masking aggressive intention.

Vulnerabilities Exploited By Manipulators:

The following are a list of vulnerabilities that may exist in the victims of manipulators. By no means comprehensive, these traits tend to be common in people who are often victimized by Psychological Manipulators.

  • A desire to please and earn the approval and acceptance of others.
  • Naivete - the victim doesn't want to believe that anyone is cunning or ruthless and may be in denial of own victimhood.
  • A fear of negative emotions.
  • Over-internationalization - believing what the manipulator says to be true, which can result in self-doubt or shame.
  • Excessive empathy - the victim tries really hard to understand the point of view of the manipulator and believes the manipulator has a justifiable reason to be hurtful.
  • Over-conscientiousness - victim is too willing to give the manipulator the benefit of the doubt.
  • Low Self-Confidence - victim lacks the ability to say no, doubts themselves, lacks confidence.
  • Emotional Dependency - the victim has a dependent or submissive personality. The more submissive or dependent, the more vulnerable the victim is to exploitation.
  • Low emotional skills - when the victim does not understand his or her emotional self well, they misinterpret feelings

Spotting Manipulation:

In an article by Fiona McColl about manipulation, she identifies several methods of spotting manipulation. If you think you are being vicitmized, these are common signs to look for.

1. Bullshit apologies are often noticable. If your inner gut is telling you that an apology is bullshit, it probably is. Further if you are honest with an emotional manipulator about your feelings, he or she may turn their angst and stress upon you, until YOU wind up comforting THEM.

2. I'll do you a favor, I guess is an example of a common manipulation tactic. A manipulator will propose or agree to assist you with a task, and follow the acceptance up with sighs and subtle behavior to let you know they do not want to follow-through on the agreement.

3. Manipulators are awesome at turning a phrase, by which I mean that they may say one thing, then later deny that they did not say anything at all! Also common is the telling of the truth in such a way as to mean something other than what, on the surface, has been said.

4. Guilt is a common tool for manipulators. Because manipulators often do not directly express their needs and wants, they use tactics, such as guilt, to get someone to act the way they want them to act. Typically this is manifested in terms of the victim needing to care for the manipulator's needs, at the expense of your own.

5. Fighting dirty is not uncommon because manipulators do not like direct confrontation. Often they are passive-aggressive and let you subtly know that they are not happy.

6. Being upstaged by the manipulator's pain - you have a headache, he has a migraine. Calling them on this behavior often results in someone becoming defensive and combative.

How To Combat Manipulation:

1. Hold them accountable! Manipulators often are not held accountable and thus have poor boundaries with others. They do what it takes to get their way. If you tell someone how they hurt your feelings and then that person turns that around to be about them and their suffering, bring the conversation back to the original point- that your feelings are hurt.

2. Take notes! Take notes about conversations and important points, so that you can refer back to those notes later when a manipulator claims a conversation went a different way or never happened.

3. Walk away! Sometimes, the best thing to do is to just walk away. Revisit the situation later, and don't get sucked in to the drama.
 
Last edited:

Claire Swazey

Spokeshole, fence sitter
This may be somewhat similar to the feeling I get when I read about or listen to devout Christians, Jews or Muslims speak about their belief systems. On one hand, I truly believe in freedom of belief. I am glad they feel they get some sort of communion with God or saints or Mary and some other things. I support that. But on the other hand, I think there are some aspects in those religions that I personally find intrinsically problematic.

I also recognize that, just as non CofS Scn'ists are free to discuss their beliefs here- and, indeed, there is a section here for this- those are public threads and not only do others have the ability to comment, but they have the right to do so.

And I think that there are people who feel about Scn (as ology) the same way I do about Christianity, Judaism and Islam- not just the churches but some of the things in their scriptures. I get that and I respect that, though some of the points made aren't always the ones I would agree with. But I can identify lots of stuff in Scn and Dn that are problematic.

It is true that the Pilot really caused some headaches for CofS. He deserves props for that, even now that he's gone.

So what's the solution? Well, there are no easy answers in life. Critics of Scn were, at least once on a.r.s., likened to a herd of cats. You can't herd cats! Nor should you want to. Life's not black and white and people aren't all one thing or another.

I think the best thing would be to be able to try to agree to disagree, feel free to be candid about opinions but be civil and friendly at the same time. This can be very difficult. An example of this difficulty could be the way people get on political fora when others of various political factions come in and debates start. It gets really really intense and angry. Flames all over the place.

As someone who's married to someone of strong and vocal political beliefs, I've asked myself why this is. I think that the uber political types are afraid that those who feel differently are going to hurt society, going to pose a threat to them somehow. I bet it's like that with this doing Scn/no don't do it, conundrum. And that's why we get veiled accusations of sociopathy and all that. Belief that someone one has never met is a certain way that constitutes a threat to that person and to society. But just as with the people who state that liberals or Republicans should be killed or otherwise neutralized (yes, some people really say stuff like that) it's really not a good idea to be like that on a public forum or any other venue. It causes strife and even pain sometimes.

I used to be a collector in a bank before transitioning into management. I found that I could tell borrowers what the problems were if they didn't pay without being mean or vehement about it. I could be candid but polite. And I was the only collector who got thank you cards from borrowers- DELINQUENT borrowers. I did not lie to them or soft pedal any of the salient details. But I kept it civil and pleasant.

It can be done. But to be done, people on both sides of the equation would need to have at least some understanding of the others' viewpoint.
 

Claire Swazey

Spokeshole, fence sitter
It's just that...

I do not understand why you would feel it necessary to crash an innocent 'hobby' thread, that does not forward the Hubbard cult in any way.

Do you know about the Pilot?

The Pilot had Miscavige foaming at the mouth.

He criticized the church. He criticized Hubbard.

He lured people away from the cult with harmless applications of the Hubbard tech they did not have to mortgage their houses for.

So your intrusion (preaching to the already converted) kind of baffles me.

So I say - WTF?

We're just playing around with philosophy here - not hurting anyone.

Your turn to explain why you did that - if you like. If not, cool.

I am doing my share to whistleblow the cult, as you should already know.

I do like the tech when it is not shoved down anyone's throat.

It is just a look at various relationships in life and some people derive benefit from it.

I used it (and Pilot's versions helped) to deprogram myself and slip out of the cult, taking others with me along the way.

Hope that explains some things.

I agree with you, in the main. But I do think that there are a lot of people who find intrinsic problems with Scn and Dn - not just CofS. And they think that any practice of those things opens the door to possibility of abuse.

There is logic to this viewpoint. If you have faulty ideas then anyone who practices that methodology may perpetuate those faulty ideas.

Now, me? I think that practicing Scn outside CofS dilutes the possibility of abuse considerably. And we aren't seeing any deaths or disconnections or bankruptcies out there in the independent scene. To me, that bears out what I'm saying.

I have, however, seen some FZers behave absolutely disgracefully toward one another, though. Really really badly. Also, if I look at what happened to the Pilot, that's a bit of a red flag. What if the tech drove him crazy? I don't know that it did but it is a distinct possibility. This may be a reason someone might come on this thread and express an opposite opinion.

I'm not trying to hurt anyone's feelings. I personally believe that I could go do some assists or some grades and believe in some ideas about "theta" and it wouldn't hurt anybody whatsoever. In fact, I'm pretty sure of it. But that's me. Others have a different perspective and there is some basis for that.

There. Now, with this post and the one I wrote before that, I've either managed to effect rapprochement between parties, or pissed ALL of you off or else, more likely, everyone will just ignore my pontificating. I'd prefer choice #1 but would settle for #3. Not #2, though, as I'd rather we all got along.
 
Re: Pilot's repost Z84 -- Home Universe Processing

.
Pilot's repost Z84

Home Universe Processing

From Post 65 – August 1999

[The Pilot wrote:]
FZ Bible recently posted a collection of 4th ACC tape transcripts.

These contain tons of group processing sessions. The 4th ACC
was the group processing ACC and had about 60 hours of group
processing that Ron did on the ACC students.

At the very end, after carrying the class up on a long
gradient, Ron runs the most fantastic process. I don't
think that you could use it on a group without ...

... (= I have snipped the rest)

_______________________________________________

The following is an edited version of what I just sent to our sister thread on the Super Scio List:

Fascinating. 4th ACC. This would be about the beginning of 1954. Ron Group processing a group of trained auditors. (now here is an old man rambling:) I remember a conference in London where Ron did some hours group processing. About '55. In one he had two tailors dummies, one on each side of the stage. One was Mom, the other Pop. The process was (as far as I can remember) "Look at Pop ... Keep him from going away", "Look at Mom ... Keep her from going away". Of course this was a conference, where not many were trained auditors. The account the Pilot gives is most interesting as is the result he got.

And the process the Pilot ran on himself. Not every ones cup of tea. I am still working my way through "lower level" case, and would not go near it. My level of self auditing is as high up as running ten minutes of 8c on myself, when something peculiar crops up like the recent posts here on the ESMB "Excerpts from the Pilot's postings" thread :) It works! got a good deal of line charges (laughs) out of it.

Another thing that that Pilot repost bought to mind was the gradient of suppressed communication we have gone through in Scientology. I think that, in the 1990's, the Pilot was rather ahead of his time (or behind it!). There was a group of cronies who he talked to about his case and processes. I have never experienced that, since I had an abysmally low communication level at the time that was possible. And now, out of the church, the shadow of "must not talk about ones case", "must not discuss processes", "must not do anything non-standard" still hangs on the shoulders of some who are ostensibly "free" of "Church" influence. Certainly I see little of that sort of communication in Copenhagen - maybe because my face to face communication level is still all too low.

Of course now with Internet (including Skype) long distance communication is possible. But how do you get to know like minded people? The Pilot, as well as having visitors in his home in Los Angeles, had a little Internet group going, in which I participated. It was very simple. Just the ordinary email facility of cc: (carbon copy) which went to all in the little group (just press "reply to all" if you wanted to contribute something).

All best wishes,

Ant

--
Antony Phillips.
www.antology.info
[[http://add:www]].youtube.com/watch?v=BmXZ4X_uYRo[/url] (in Danish)
http://scientolipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Antony_Phillips (English biography)
[email protected]
(+45) 45 88 88 69
Admin to SelfClearing2004,
SuperScio, Cosmic History
mailing lists
Jernbanevej 3f 4th
DK 2800 Lyngby
_______________________________________________
 

Free Being Me

Crusader
Re: Pilot's repost Z84 -- Home Universe Processing

The following is an edited version of what I just sent to our sister thread on the Super Scio List:

Fascinating. 4th ACC. This would be about the beginning of 1954. Ron Group processing a group of trained auditors. (now here is an old man rambling:) I remember a conference in London where Ron did some hours group processing. About '55. In one he had two tailors dummies, one on each side of the stage. One was Mom, the other Pop. The process was (as far as I can remember) "Look at Pop ... Keep him from going away", "Look at Mom ... Keep her from going away". Of course this was a conference, where not many were trained auditors. The account the Pilot gives is most interesting as is the result he got.

And the process the Pilot ran on himself. Not every ones cup of tea. I am still working my way through "lower level" case, and would not go near it. My level of self auditing is as high up as running ten minutes of 8c on myself, when something peculiar crops up like the recent posts here on the ESMB "Excerpts from the Pilot's postings" thread :) It works! got a good deal of line charges (laughs) out of it.

Another thing that that Pilot repost bought to mind was the gradient of suppressed communication we have gone through in Scientology. I think that, in the 1990's, the Pilot was rather ahead of his time (or behind it!). There was a group of cronies who he talked to about his case and processes. I have never experienced that, since I had an abysmally low communication level at the time that was possible. And now, out of the church, the shadow of "must not talk about ones case", "must not discuss processes", "must not do anything non-standard" still hangs on the shoulders of some who are ostensibly "free" of "Church" influence. Certainly I see little of that sort of communication in Copenhagen - maybe because my face to face communication level is still all too low.

Of course now with Internet (including Skype) long distance communication is possible. But how do you get to know like minded people? The Pilot, as well as having visitors in his home in Los Angeles, had a little Internet group going, in which I participated. It was very simple. Just the ordinary email facility of cc: (carbon copy) which went to all in the little group (just press "reply to all" if you wanted to contribute something).

All best wishes,

Ant

--
Antony Phillips.
www.antology.info
[[http://add:www]].youtube.com/watch?v=BmXZ4X_uYRo[/url] (in Danish)
http://scientolipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Antony_Phillips (English biography)
[email protected]
(+45) 45 88 88 69
Admin to SelfClearing2004,
SuperScio, Cosmic History
mailing lists
Jernbanevej 3f 4th
DK 2800 Lyngby
_______________________________________________

e40e601d1cdfe1bdf03d8fdb1fe37a3a.jpg
 

Cat's Squirrel

Gold Meritorious Patron
Re: Pilot's repost Z84 -- Home Universe Processing


And both are easier than trying to have a civil and productive discussion about the tech on ESMB. I honestly don't know why I bother posting on here any more.

I, and no doubt all the others posting Pilot's writings to this thread, get that you and a few others here think the whole thing is a crock of shite, really we do. Even though as far as I can see none of you have actually tried any of Pilot's processes for yourselves. So why keep going on about it?

BTW, I am proof that the "no psychosomatic illnesses cured" is untrue. I had a bad dose of gastritis, of five years' standing, blow on doing the "Ups and Downs" course (an introductory version of the PTS Rundown). Yes, in my local Org.

I can't prove it to your or anyone else's satisfaction, but I don't need to. Take it or leave it.
 
Last edited:

F.Bullbait

Oh, a wise guy,eh?
Re: Pilot's repost Z84 -- Home Universe Processing

And both are easier than trying to have a civil and productive discussion about the tech on ESMB. I honestly don't know why I bother posting on here any more.


Because your input is appreciated more than you know. Keep it up. Love, FB
 

Free Being Me

Crusader
Re: Pilot's repost Z84 -- Home Universe Processing

And both are easier than trying to have a civil and productive discussion about the tech on ESMB. I honestly don't know why I bother posting on here any more.

I, and no doubt all the others posting Pilot's writings to this thread, get that you and a few others here think the whole thing is a crock of shite, really we do. Even though as far as I can see none of you have actually tried any of Pilot's processes for yourselves. So why keep going on about it?

BTW, I am proof that the "no psychsomatic illnesses cured" is untrue. I had a bad dose of gastritis, of five years' standing, blow on doing the "Ups and Downs" course (an introductory version of the PTS Rundown). Yes, in my local Org.

I can't prove it to your or anyone else's satisfaction, but I don't need to. Take it or leave it.

No one is being uncivil. Here is a beautiful quote from Smilla that sums up the cognitive dissonance of pursuing the tek, upset tummies and miraculously available parking spaces aside. I'm not interested in fixing anyone or telling anyone how wrong they are for still believing in Elcon's lies, much less for believing in derivatives thereof. I am interested in warning people off from the tragedy that Elcon started and if that makes some people uncomfortable, then good. They should feel uncomfortable when it comes to realizing the significance of what can happen to them or did happen from $cientology. I truly wish every person ever in including their friends and families true healing in their own way and time, even if they never find it, at least I and others cared enough to say this is wrong. Namaste.

I am not a Scientologist, but I do stand shoulder to shoulder with anyone fighting for their right to brainwash people. I also defend people's right to be brainwashed. If you can't see the fairness in that, that's your problem. Period.
 

Cat's Squirrel

Gold Meritorious Patron
Re: Pilot's repost Z84 -- Home Universe Processing

No one is being uncivil. Here is a beautiful quote from Smilla that sums up the cognitive dissonance of pursuing the tek, upset tummies and miraculously available parking spaces aside. I'm not interested in fixing anyone or telling anyone how wrong they are for still believing in Elcon's lies, much less for believing in derivatives thereof. I am interested in warning people off from the tragedy that Elcon started and if that makes some people uncomfortable, then good. They should feel uncomfortable when it comes to realizing the significance of what can happen to them or did happen from $cientology. I truly wish every person ever in including their friends and families true healing in their own way and time, even if they never find it, at least I and others cared enough to say this is wrong. Namaste.

It's not a case of being uncomfortable. it's a case of being irritated; because when you comment on Pilot's works, as you did above with your comment about Ant (someone with over 60 years' experience in the Tech) being fooled, you're claiming an authority over people like Ant and me, like we're all poor deluded fools who should be grateful to be put in their place by such exemplars of spiritual insight and common sense as yourselves (since you refer to "others").

Don't you see how arrogant that sounds?

Sorry, but I simply don't believe you or the others who do this are the ultra-wise and all-knowing savants you claim to be.

If I did, I'd be asking you for the answers, since I freely admit I haven't found the way out of the trap yet. Nor had Pilot - but he admitted that he hadn't, and called upon everyone interested in doing so to help him find it. One more reason why it's wrong IMO to equate him with Ron and the CofS (as is being done constantly throughout this thread).
 
Last edited:

Claire Swazey

Spokeshole, fence sitter
If an evangelical Christian were here, they would say that they knew exactly where others were going off the rails. Jesus wasn't accepted as one's personal savior. Bibles, tracts, etc, would be handled out. Hellfire might be mentioned.

An atheist would say that they knew exactly where others were going off the rails. That people were chasing after spiritual effects and phenomena that didn't exist. A large man in a suit and ponytail would trumpet "bullshit", perhaps, if one were really fortunate.

A Muslim would remind us that there is no god but God and Muhammed is his prophet.

A CofS member would grumble about squirrels and bitter apostates.

What would they all have in common? That they all had their own perspectives of the errata and folly of those on this thread who are interested in this methodology. And that they knew exactly where people were going wrong. Yet every single one of them would have come up with an entirely different reason of where people were messing up and what they needed.

(she said, glancing around meaningfully)

They would have one other thing in common. In their assertions and certainty, they'd have forgotten that the other people to whom they were talking were adults.
 
Top