What's new

The Social Cost of Questioning Your Tribal Leaders

Alanzo

Bardo Tulpa
:laugh:

Oh Alanzo!

Just coming back from my daily walk in the beautiful park just besides my home.

Lot of kids playing, bicycles, a little devil dog wanted to play with me..a real devil..lolAnd suddenly I saw the kites in the sky..and it made me remember my childhood..and the sky was so blue and it is a warm August summer day. And I though of Jana and wonder if she can see me! .. And I was grateful to have this nice park and this beautiful day.

My encounterings of today were nice for the soul..so I am sorry to report you didn't make my day dark..neither your gaslighting of me being a foul- tempered woman is hurting me..to the opposite you made my day for this good laughter.
:laugh:
( I must admit I am a little flattered of such attention)

May I suggest to be careful since, when out of arguments, a good thing is to give up, instead of behaving childish..one is mature the other is ego driven.

Think about it
so you may accommodate of
Screeching harpy auntie Lotus!
:D
No you are misinterpreting me.
I am the screeching Harpy - NOT YOU.

I am the one screeching and complaining.

I was NOT calling you a screeching Harpy!
 

Bill

Gold Meritorious Patron
I have these ideals, these expectations, these standards for what an Ex-Scientologist should be.

I believe that an Ex-Scientologist has been through a very unique set of experiences for a human being: they've had their whole worldview, everything they thought was true, collapse on them. I believe this experience can lead the way to a deep insight into the nature of being human.

A lot of people, such as never-ins, like to remind Exes (over and over) that they were "naive" and "gullible" and "taken in by a con man". And with this comes the shame of being "conned". If an Ex forgets what deep emotional need was being served by choosing every day to be a Scientologist, or pretends the fulfillment of that need was a weakness of some kind, then the strength they have gained from their experience of leaving Scientology can be drained right out of them.

They can be convinced they did not gain wisdom from their experiences that few humans have ever acquired - especially those never-ins which seek to shame them. Never-ins have never had their worldviews tested like Exes have. They have (quote arrogantly) never felt the need to have them tested. They never "fell' for anything other than mainstream society, things like Richard Nixon, the Cold War, and Donald Trump.

But Exes wanted more. And in many cases they found more in Scientology.

Getting out of Scientology is not something you recover from - it is something you are strengthened by.

So I have these standards and expectations and ideals about what Exes should be.

And those standards are NOT delusions: Almost every single one of you were the embodiment of those standards when I was on ESMB before - questioning, criticizing and fighting against Scientology. And helping others to do the same.

Yet look at you now with regard to your new Anti-Scientology leaders.

I was not the only one to have these ideals, these expectations, these standards for ourselves as Exes.

Now was I?
I do not live my life according to your expectations. I'm pretty sure the others here are living their lives as they wish, not as you "expect". If that disappoints you ... deal with it - because no one is going to change just to make you happy.

In my opinion, what you should do is ...

Stop trying to control other people's lives
 

Alanzo

Bardo Tulpa
I do not live my life according to your expectations. I'm pretty sure the others here are living their lives as they wish, not as you "expect". If that disappoints you ... deal with it - because no one is going to change just to make you happy.

In my opinion, what you should do is ...

Stop trying to control other people's lives
My criticisms of you, come from my expectations.

Your criticisms of me, come from yours.

So take your own advice.

Or ignore my posts and stop being a fucking hypocrite.
 

AD1950

Patron
My criticism of you, come from my expectations.

Your criticisms of me, come from yours.

So take your own advice.
Alonzo,

We all need to raise our tone above 2.0, and achieve the status of "clear" to help
save our society and by extension our planet, but Dianetics and LRH have failed us.

Perhaps only you have the answers we need. Tell us what to do.
 

Veda

Sponsor
Leah Remini and Mike Rinder are Alanzo's real target. The other two people are add-ons.

leah-remini-site.png


My difficulty with the current Alanzo is his language, his phrases, his cliches. They come from places such as Scientology's Freedom Magazine, and Scientology propaganda groups such as 'Stand' and 'Freedom, Media, and Ethics'.

It's as though these were not his own ideas, but someone else's that he's parroting.

Very much unlike the old Alanzo from many years ago, who, although he went on crusades then also, was at least original.
 

Veda

Sponsor
My criticisms of you, come from my expectations.

Your criticisms of me, come from yours.

So take your own advice.

Or ignore my posts and stop being a fucking hypocrite.
I don't remember the old Alanzo using profanity.

Is this even Alanzo?

With all the angry outbursts and F bombs, it sounds more like David Miscavige.




we-strand-tall-miscavige-scientology.jpg
 

Alanzo

Bardo Tulpa
Alonzo,

We all need to raise our tone above 2.0, and achieve the status of "clear" to help
save our society and by extension our planet, but Dianetics and LRH have failed us.

Perhaps only you have the answers we need. Tell us what to do.
Here AD1950.

Here's my advice to you:

I’ve seen this since Tony Ortega arrived on the scene in 2011. There is a strange kind of mandate in any communication that Tony Ortega engages in with any Ex-Scientologist. It’s the mandate that you come to one simplistic and shallow confession which he demands of you: “I was conned by Scientology”

No other explanation, no other in-depth and intimate examination of the complexities of your own life is acceptable. All must throw away any nuance, any real human truth about their own lives and forsake all other conclusions.

It really was a Torquemada moment while watching Tony Ortega ask a question to Ron Miscavige Sr toward the end of an hour long interview when Tony at 48:08 said:

“I enjoy the most about your book is you’re going through the meticulous planning that you and Becky had to do to leave it base. And I love the ruse that you came up with. You said you were sending Becky’s mother birthday gifts and you were gonna send her like 75 gifts for her 75th birthday. And that way, every day, you were able to box up some of your own possessions and mail them to her as if they were birthday presents. Brilliant! I thought that was so wonderful. And I thought that shows what somebody has to go through to escape it base.”|​

“But the thing that just knocked me out was when you explained that these you know because everything you sent out it was a risk there was a risk of guard might open it up and but you guys you were taking a risk and what was it that you were risking your freedom. for you were mailing to yourself your l ron hubbard books! I couldn’t believe that Ron! Now years later what do you think about that?”​

You can see Ron emit an uneasy laugh. Like he is really being put on the spot. And so here’s where Ron Miscavige Sr’s obligatory prostration to Tony Ortega occurs. He says:

“Yeah Excuse me if you’re a little bit nuts and you don’t know you’re a little bit nuts you’re really nuts. But it took me looking in the mirror one day after I spoke to a very good friend of mine, Fernando Gamboa, and he says “Ronny we were conned”​

“And in my hallway in my little home in Wisconsin here there’s a full-length Baron mirror on the door to a little closet. I say little because it was built in 1938 and they didn’t have closets big in those days because people didn’t have a big wardrobe, but I looked at myself in that mirror and I said “Ron you were conned” and that’s when the whole bubble burst and those books are down in the basement.”​

And now Torquemada Ortega’s work is done. Ron Miscavige’s whole Scientology career is splayed open, and the heretic has broken. No more need to think about any of this. It complies with the conformity of thought and the uniformity of belief all Exes must commit to when they come out of Scientology and kiss the human-skinned ass of Tony Ortega.

And we’re now done with that question.

Next Ex!

[format=h3]What Ex-Scientologists Believe About Their Own Pasts in Scientology is Not Tony Ortega’s, or any Never-ins Business[/format]

The real problem here, which almost every Ex finds after a while, is that the “I was conned” conclusion is too simplistic to explain who you were as a Scientologist to yourself, and to understand your time in Scientology.

Simplistic answers don’t work because they don’t correspond to the complexities of real life. A conclusion such as “I was conned” is so simplistic that it is actually false, and will cause problems for an Ex later on.

Also, it is not an answer. It is simply a supreme self-invalidation.

Ron Miscavige Scientology – if you read this, hear me: You are not done answering this question.

But this is the simplistic limit of Tony Ortega’s comprehension of what it means to have been a Scientologist. And it always will be.

Has any Ex thought to ask “Who is Tony Ortega to be asking people about what religious beliefs they find important in their own lives?”

He is the last person to discuss these things with. As a militant atheist, Ortega has absolutely no respect or even capacity to understand any religious or spiritual pursuit, nor what any person gets out of them. He is especially retarded on the subject of Scientology – which he hates with a spittled passion.

Why this community of Ex-Scientologists has let this kind of abuse happen to the most vulnerable Exes at the most vulnerable times of their lives, after experiencing such a loss of faith, is one of the most obscene things I’ve seen way too much of since 2011.

There is a LOT more to the idea of what you were getting out of Scientology while you were a Scientologist for decades than “I was conned”, Ron.

Every Ex who has to be friends with Tony Ortega MUST prostrate themselves and voice this simplistic and shallow invalidation of their whole lives to him.

Talk about elder abuse.

Why is Ron Miscavige letting Tony Ortega do this to him?

Why are ANY Exes letting Tony Ortega do this to them?
 

Bill

Gold Meritorious Patron
Here AD1950.

Here's my advice to you:

I’ve seen this since Tony Ortega arrived on the scene in 2011. There is a strange kind of mandate in any communication that Tony Ortega engages in with any Ex-Scientologist. It’s the mandate that you come to one simplistic and shallow confession which he demands of you: “I was conned by Scientology”

No other explanation, no other in-depth and intimate examination of the complexities of your own life is acceptable. All must throw away any nuance, any real human truth about their own lives and forsake all other conclusions.

It really was a Torquemada moment while watching Tony Ortega ask a question to Ron Miscavige Sr toward the end of an hour long interview when Tony at 48:08 said:

“I enjoy the most about your book is you’re going through the meticulous planning that you and Becky had to do to leave it base. And I love the ruse that you came up with. You said you were sending Becky’s mother birthday gifts and you were gonna send her like 75 gifts for her 75th birthday. And that way, every day, you were able to box up some of your own possessions and mail them to her as if they were birthday presents. Brilliant! I thought that was so wonderful. And I thought that shows what somebody has to go through to escape it base.”|​

“But the thing that just knocked me out was when you explained that these you know because everything you sent out it was a risk there was a risk of guard might open it up and but you guys you were taking a risk and what was it that you were risking your freedom. for you were mailing to yourself your l ron hubbard books! I couldn’t believe that Ron! Now years later what do you think about that?”​

You can see Ron emit an uneasy laugh. Like he is really being put on the spot. And so here’s where Ron Miscavige Sr’s obligatory prostration to Tony Ortega occurs. He says:

“Yeah Excuse me if you’re a little bit nuts and you don’t know you’re a little bit nuts you’re really nuts. But it took me looking in the mirror one day after I spoke to a very good friend of mine, Fernando Gamboa, and he says “Ronny we were conned”​

“And in my hallway in my little home in Wisconsin here there’s a full-length Baron mirror on the door to a little closet. I say little because it was built in 1938 and they didn’t have closets big in those days because people didn’t have a big wardrobe, but I looked at myself in that mirror and I said “Ron you were conned” and that’s when the whole bubble burst and those books are down in the basement.”​

And now Torquemada Ortega’s work is done. Ron Miscavige’s whole Scientology career is splayed open, and the heretic has broken. No more need to think about any of this. It complies with the conformity of thought and the uniformity of belief all Exes must commit to when they come out of Scientology and kiss the human-skinned ass of Tony Ortega.

And we’re now done with that question.

Next Ex!

What Ex-Scientologists Believe About Their Own Pasts in Scientology is Not Tony Ortega’s Business

The real problem here, which almost every Ex finds after a while, is that the “I was conned” conclusion is too simplistic to explain who you were as a Scientologist to yourself, and to understand your time in Scientology.

Simplistic answers don’t work because they don’t correspond to the complexities of real life. A conclusion such as “I was conned” is so simplistic that it is actually false, and will cause problems for an Ex later on.

Also, it is not an answer. It is simply a supreme self-invalidation.

Ron Miscavige Scientology – if you read this, hear me: You are not done answering this question.

But this is the simplistic limit of Tony Ortega’s comprehension of what it means to have been a Scientologist. And it always will be.

Has any Ex thought to ask “Who is Tony Ortega to be asking people about what religious beliefs they find important in their own lives?”

He is the last person to discuss these things with. As a militant atheist, Ortega has absolutely no respect or even capacity to understand any religious or spiritual pursuit, nor what any person gets out of them. He is especially retarded on the subject of Scientology – which he hates with a spittled passion.

Why this community of Ex-Scientologists has let this kind of abuse happen to the most vulnerable Exes at the most vulnerable times of their lives, after experiencing such a loss of faith, is one of the most obscene things I’ve seen way too much of since 2011.

There is a LOT more to the idea of what you were getting out of Scientology while you were a Scientologist for decades than “I was conned”, Ron.

Every Ex who has to be friends with Tony Ortega MUST prostrate themselves and voice this simplistic and shallow invalidation of their whole lives to him.

Talk about elder abuse.

Why is Ron Miscavige letting Tony Ortega do this to him?

Why are ANY Exes letting Tony Ortega do this to them?
You keep doing this and it makes no sense. You seem to think that ALL ex-Scientologists are all together, getting orders and making secret agreements.

THAT DOESN'T EXIST. There is no "tribe" here. There is no "tribal leader" here. This is all a figment of your imagination.
 

Alanzo

Bardo Tulpa
You keep doing this and it makes no sense. You seem to think that ALL ex-Scientologists are all together, getting orders and making secret agreements.

THAT DOESN'T EXIST. There is no "tribe" here. There is no "tribal leader" here. This is all a figment of your imagination.
I'm pretty sure you didn't read this post. Because it has nothing to do with what you said above.

You are just blindly batting back.

Don't make me regret taking you off ignore.
 

Free Being Me

Crusader
I have these ideals, these expectations, these standards for what an Ex-Scientologist should be.

>snip<

So I have these standards and expectations and ideals about what Exes should be.

>snip<
Let people be themselves, be their own individual person instead of projecting your ill-thought-out pseudo ideologies onto an entire community of people. I don't need you to tell me what to think, who to criticize and how and how I'm supposed to frame my $cio past all according to your "expectations." Give it a rest.
 

Alanzo

Bardo Tulpa
Quick shift to Tony Ortega.

Alanzo - or whoever this is - is dancing.

Ortega5.jpg
Yeah, Veda.

This is such a shift for Alanzo - criticizing Tony Ortega now. Obviously, an OSA Agent has taken over Alanzo's Account.

Who knew that such a staunch anti-Scientologist for 50 years could become so ham-handed and hysterical?
 

AD1950

Patron
If we are now concerned with examination and disparagement of Tony Ortega, for balance we must
acknowledge that he has maintained a critical output (read by thousands) on a daily basis for almost
a decade now. He has also helped launch many critical efforts by others, including a shelf-load of books,
numerous critical media inquiries by major networks, and a cable television series viewed by millions.

Ortega may be short, when it comes to empathy for survivors of abuse within criminal organizations
such as Scientology, but the instance cited concerned one of the few persons who was in a position
to stop it. Ron Miscavige is complicit in many of the actions of his son, as he remained on base during them.

By comparison, Alonzo is the "tribal leader" here, within the full scope and depth, encompassed by this
discussion thread. With time, this may extend to several dozen views. Obviously, this represents a
superior accomplishment, worthy of a $14.27 gift card to the Olive Garden (at the very least).
 

Veda

Sponsor
Yeah, Veda.

This is such a shift for Alanzo - criticizing Tony Ortega now. Obviously, an OSA Agent has taken over Alanzo's Account.

More ham-handed hysterics from Veda.

Who knew?
More like a strange case of delayed Stockholm syndrome.

If you start dressing up like Patty Hearst, its time to start worrying.

patty-hearst-sla-920x920-e1460599774123.jpg
 

Alanzo

Bardo Tulpa
If we are now concerned with examination and disparagement of Tony Ortega, for balance we must
acknowledge that he has maintained a critical output (read by thousands) on a daily basis for almost
a decade now.
All the more reason this output should be scrutinized and questioned - for precisely the reasons I have raised. "Upstats" do not deserve protection from criticism.

As I have shown, if you swallow Tony Ortega whole - meaning to accept his crap with out criticism as an Ex-Scientologist, he will damage you.
 

AD1950

Patron
What if Tanya, actually, had the answers?

Margaret Singer diagnosed both Patty Hearst AND survivors of Scientology.

(Things that should make you go HMMM...)
 

Veda

Sponsor
a staunch anti-Scientologist for 50 years could become so ham-handed and hysterical?
I've never been an "anti Scientologist," and certainly wasn't one fifty years ago.

The use of "anti-Scientologist" by you makes my point. It's stilted language. Unnatural.

Only Scientology cultists, un-selfconsciously, use language like "anti-Scientologist."

Strange.
 

freethinker

Sponsor
I have these ideals, these expectations, these standards for what an Ex-Scientologist should be.

I believe that an Ex-Scientologist has been through a very unique set of experiences for a human being: they've had their whole worldview, everything they thought was true, collapse on them. I believe this experience can lead the way to a deep insight into the nature of being human.

A lot of people, such as never-ins, like to remind Exes (over and over) that they were "naive" and "gullible" and "taken in by a con man". And with this comes the shame of being "conned". If an Ex forgets what deep emotional need was being served by intentionally choosing every day to be a Scientologist, or pretends the fulfillment of that need was a weakness or vulnerability of some kind, then the strength and wisdom (yes wisdom) they have gained from their experience of leaving Scientology can be drained right out of them.

They can be convinced they did not gain wisdom from their experiences that few humans have ever acquired - especially those never-ins which seek to shame them (And Asshole Exes like HH).

Never-ins have never had their worldviews tested like Exes have (Opinion). They have (quite arrogantly) never felt the need to have them tested. They never "fell' for anything other than mainstream society, things like Richard Nixon, the Cold War, and Donald Trump.

But Exes wanted more. And in many cases they found more in Scientology (Opinion). For a while at least, until their needs stopped being met. Then they left.

Getting out of Scientology is not something you recover from - it is something you are strengthened by.

So I have these standards and expectations and ideals about what Exes should be.

And those standards are NOT delusions: Almost every single one of you were the embodiment of those standards when I was on ESMB before - questioning, criticizing and fighting against Scientology. And helping shaming others to do the same.

Yet look at you now with regard to your new Anti-Scientology leaders friends.

I was not the only one to have these ideals, these expectations, these standards for ourselves as Exes.

Now was I?
FIFY, thanks for clearing that up.
 
Top