What's new

The Truth about Marty Rathburn

Voltaire's Child

Fool on the Hill
Jesus Fucking Christ, I said no fucking such thing. I'm talking to someone who's quoting Scn at ME so I gave a SCN REFERENCE. Please see my sigline and do try to keep up.



Would you please explain the word "sigline" to me - I cant find it in my dictionary. Hm but maybe I was just too stupid to read.:confused2:

Why are you so angry VC. Maybe because you know that I don't like people who try to defend Hubbards nonsense Technology?

Nah. I just dislike being misquoted and condescended to.


P.S. Oh VC you were talking about your "signature line" "Ex CofS member since August 2000. Ex Scientologist since 11/06/2009" well sorry that I have some other fish to fry in my life - like my family my friends, my job, my garden, my house and fighting a real fight in the real world against the Church of Scientology not only here on this board.

I realize you have other fish to fry. My comment about my sigline was made because I thought you seemed to be treating me like a rondroid. Since the sigline was on the posts to which you were responding and you had time to read the POST and time to type a response to it, that seemed wonky. Still does.
 

FlunkedForLaughing

Patron with Honors
Good post Aaron. Here's something I've been thinking about since I read this post a few days ago. I wanted to ask you and everyone here about it.

Is it possible that if someone like Marty Rathburn or Pat Broeker were running the CO$ instead of DM, maybe, just maybe, it would be a kinder and gentler CO$? Maybe the tech would not have gone through so many changes. Maybe there would not be so much abuse for staff members. Maybe there would be a little less pressure for the continuing donations. Maybe there would be less forced disconnections. Maybe the Int executives would still be on post doing their jobs. Maybe because of this, Scn would be in better shape today and lots of Scn's would not have left.

Don't get me wrong, I'm happy DM is where he is. He is hurting the church a lot by what he is doing. The church is going downhill fast. This is a good thing.

But Aaron's post got me thinking about the direction of Scn from the early days, and how DM has not really changed it. I thought DM had accelerated the decline. I wanted to see what others thought.

FFL
 
Top