KnightVision
Gold Meritorious Patron
Let's take TD's little rant apart... piece by piece....
"Your February 15 piece is offensive.
-Notice how he tries to attempt to invent (false) value to his (self imposed) position as an (assumed) authority! Secondly, he's (failingly) trying to make a 'sting' by invalidating the author. Thirdly, notice that he is using the emotion of 'victim'.... ALL THIS because he knows he has no moral nor honest base from which to operate from!
Your clear intention is to forward an anti-religious agenda that has nothing to do with conveying the truth.
Never defend! ALWAYS ATTACK! Notice the arrogant, condescending attitude. Further consider the absolute stupidity and (failed) insults he flings out... that the author of Catholic Online has "a clear intention to forward an anti-religious agenda".... hmmm. Let's see now.... Report on ex-scns who speaks of abuses they suffered = "a clear intention to forward an anti-religious agenda". AH! Yes... very clear now! Anybody who is critical of the Co$ is... = "a clear intention to forward an anti-religious agenda".
I've no doubt that readers of Catholic Online have now identified TD/Co$/DM as the real perpetrators of "a clear intention to forward an anti-religious agenda"!
The Anti-Christ perhaps....
To forward on a Catholic site the vicious and false allegations of disgruntled ex-members of any religion is the epitome of hypocrisy.
Now this here is a beauty! Really Outstanding! So let's see now...
Notice how TD feels he has the (un) authority to predetermine the current 'on trial' verdict of the allegations made against the Co$! What does it likely tell us and or Catholic Online subscribers when this type of vehement yet unsubstantiated judgement and venal character assassination of witnesses is used to 'defend itself'????
Only THE GUILTY are compelled to act like this when accused of criminal activity.
TD, let us help you out here.... What he is really saying (trying to Mind Control & Manipulate) is 'To forward on a Catholic site the allegations of disgruntled ex-members of Scientology is the epitome of hypocrisy.'
No constructive purpose is served whatsoever, and you are in fact promoting religious hatred and violence.
They just can't go 'off script'... ya kno? Really TD.... gotta hand it to you, only a severely demented cult member would throw out this accusation at a publicist for a major religion.
What I do like about it is that it is all but certain TD/DM/COS/LRH that you have just entered a new phase within the black clouds that are your future.
Your entire article is so un-Christian, it boggles the mind!
WOW.... Another of your exceptional OT abilities TD????- you, more so than Christians themselves are an expert on Christianity, it's beliefs and actions. Man... dude never ceases to amaze me!
"In our last conversation I noted that it is the firm belief of the Church of Scientology that only by all religions working together to assist mankind do we hold any hope for Man´s salvation.
Tommy, Tommy, Tommy... Get Your A*s to Word Clearing NOW!
You are FAIL on the name and meaning of JESUS. Ya see Dear Boy... He alone is the Catholic/Christian hope for man's salvation. Sorry to disappoint you Child but YOU are not Jesus. Nor is your para-military organization in any way even remotely considered of any importance, in Catholics views, an 'assistance' in "any hope for Man´s salvation'.
Are you trying to rewrite the Catholic Religion Too... ?
Your support of antireligionists and hatemongers evidences that you find some benefit in railing against and defaming a religion you know nothing about.
Oh but just HOW Catholics and the world at large really are getting to know so very much about your 'religion' Mr. Tommy Boy. Not good. Not good 'ol chap...
By your own admission, you have never visited one of our churches, despite a longstanding open invitation. This, sir, is most definitely the antithesis of brotherly love.
OH! The Co$ is about 'brotherly love'? My, my... learn something new every day. By the way... I don't recall ever reading those words (brotherly love) in any Scn text???? Or was that DM's additive???
I hope that you may one day find it in yourself to be more tolerant and truthful in your actions,
You're projecting Tommy. Psychology 101.
"You appear to be acting as the publicist for the hate group Anonymous and the ex-Scientologists you cite.
He/they don't need to Tommy... That's you're job... AND what a job you're doing!
Your benign identification of Anonymous as an "Internet-based group" is tantamount to calling the KKK a "community-based group," without mentioning their history of white sheets, burning crosses, lynchings, violence and hatemongering against blacks, Jews and Catholics.
In fact Mr. Davis you have just paid the most outrageous insult to any and all victims of the KKK. By comparing the activities of the Chanology group of 'Anons' with the atrocities manufactured by the KKK is tantamount to telling the victims of the KKK that their aggressors were just rallying to a good cause. Flunk. Yet Well Done for showing the world just how heartless and compassionless you and your Co$ really are.
"……The "press conference" you report was not a press conference at all, but a shameless and transparent effort by plaintiffs involved in a lawsuit against the Church to flank a frivolous legal action.
No TD, that's what your Co$ abuses the press and court rooms for. Again Projection, Psy. 101.
Your obvious disappointment that, as you state, "reporters preferred to focus more attention on the two lawsuits and the work of Anonymous" than on the speakers´ stories, tells the tale; the performances from the stage were transparently coached and rehearsed to prop up the legal case.
Hmmm... wonder where you got that idea from? Isn't that exactly what you are so beautifully displaying? You're an ace Davis. ('cept we can see right through it).
One member of the media left irate a few minutes into the show, remarking that "I was tricked—I thought I was coming to a news conference, not a deposition."
Now, now Tommy... Did you think nobody noticed? 'One member of the media'??? Forgot to mention which Media outlet you're referring to....??? Surely it was just hindsight.
"Your February 15 piece is offensive.
-Notice how he tries to attempt to invent (false) value to his (self imposed) position as an (assumed) authority! Secondly, he's (failingly) trying to make a 'sting' by invalidating the author. Thirdly, notice that he is using the emotion of 'victim'.... ALL THIS because he knows he has no moral nor honest base from which to operate from!
Your clear intention is to forward an anti-religious agenda that has nothing to do with conveying the truth.
Never defend! ALWAYS ATTACK! Notice the arrogant, condescending attitude. Further consider the absolute stupidity and (failed) insults he flings out... that the author of Catholic Online has "a clear intention to forward an anti-religious agenda".... hmmm. Let's see now.... Report on ex-scns who speaks of abuses they suffered = "a clear intention to forward an anti-religious agenda". AH! Yes... very clear now! Anybody who is critical of the Co$ is... = "a clear intention to forward an anti-religious agenda".
I've no doubt that readers of Catholic Online have now identified TD/Co$/DM as the real perpetrators of "a clear intention to forward an anti-religious agenda"!
The Anti-Christ perhaps....
To forward on a Catholic site the vicious and false allegations of disgruntled ex-members of any religion is the epitome of hypocrisy.
Now this here is a beauty! Really Outstanding! So let's see now...
Notice how TD feels he has the (un) authority to predetermine the current 'on trial' verdict of the allegations made against the Co$! What does it likely tell us and or Catholic Online subscribers when this type of vehement yet unsubstantiated judgement and venal character assassination of witnesses is used to 'defend itself'????
Only THE GUILTY are compelled to act like this when accused of criminal activity.
TD, let us help you out here.... What he is really saying (trying to Mind Control & Manipulate) is 'To forward on a Catholic site the allegations of disgruntled ex-members of Scientology is the epitome of hypocrisy.'
No constructive purpose is served whatsoever, and you are in fact promoting religious hatred and violence.
They just can't go 'off script'... ya kno? Really TD.... gotta hand it to you, only a severely demented cult member would throw out this accusation at a publicist for a major religion.
What I do like about it is that it is all but certain TD/DM/COS/LRH that you have just entered a new phase within the black clouds that are your future.
Your entire article is so un-Christian, it boggles the mind!
WOW.... Another of your exceptional OT abilities TD????- you, more so than Christians themselves are an expert on Christianity, it's beliefs and actions. Man... dude never ceases to amaze me!
"In our last conversation I noted that it is the firm belief of the Church of Scientology that only by all religions working together to assist mankind do we hold any hope for Man´s salvation.
Tommy, Tommy, Tommy... Get Your A*s to Word Clearing NOW!
You are FAIL on the name and meaning of JESUS. Ya see Dear Boy... He alone is the Catholic/Christian hope for man's salvation. Sorry to disappoint you Child but YOU are not Jesus. Nor is your para-military organization in any way even remotely considered of any importance, in Catholics views, an 'assistance' in "any hope for Man´s salvation'.
Are you trying to rewrite the Catholic Religion Too... ?
Your support of antireligionists and hatemongers evidences that you find some benefit in railing against and defaming a religion you know nothing about.
Oh but just HOW Catholics and the world at large really are getting to know so very much about your 'religion' Mr. Tommy Boy. Not good. Not good 'ol chap...
By your own admission, you have never visited one of our churches, despite a longstanding open invitation. This, sir, is most definitely the antithesis of brotherly love.
OH! The Co$ is about 'brotherly love'? My, my... learn something new every day. By the way... I don't recall ever reading those words (brotherly love) in any Scn text???? Or was that DM's additive???
I hope that you may one day find it in yourself to be more tolerant and truthful in your actions,
You're projecting Tommy. Psychology 101.
"You appear to be acting as the publicist for the hate group Anonymous and the ex-Scientologists you cite.
He/they don't need to Tommy... That's you're job... AND what a job you're doing!
Your benign identification of Anonymous as an "Internet-based group" is tantamount to calling the KKK a "community-based group," without mentioning their history of white sheets, burning crosses, lynchings, violence and hatemongering against blacks, Jews and Catholics.
In fact Mr. Davis you have just paid the most outrageous insult to any and all victims of the KKK. By comparing the activities of the Chanology group of 'Anons' with the atrocities manufactured by the KKK is tantamount to telling the victims of the KKK that their aggressors were just rallying to a good cause. Flunk. Yet Well Done for showing the world just how heartless and compassionless you and your Co$ really are.
"……The "press conference" you report was not a press conference at all, but a shameless and transparent effort by plaintiffs involved in a lawsuit against the Church to flank a frivolous legal action.
No TD, that's what your Co$ abuses the press and court rooms for. Again Projection, Psy. 101.
Your obvious disappointment that, as you state, "reporters preferred to focus more attention on the two lawsuits and the work of Anonymous" than on the speakers´ stories, tells the tale; the performances from the stage were transparently coached and rehearsed to prop up the legal case.
Hmmm... wonder where you got that idea from? Isn't that exactly what you are so beautifully displaying? You're an ace Davis. ('cept we can see right through it).
One member of the media left irate a few minutes into the show, remarking that "I was tricked—I thought I was coming to a news conference, not a deposition."
Now, now Tommy... Did you think nobody noticed? 'One member of the media'??? Forgot to mention which Media outlet you're referring to....??? Surely it was just hindsight.