Yah. I wonder if some of those people who scream the loudest about anyone posting (what amounts to) a minority view re Scn- weren't nice little DM style martinets gaily fucking everyone over when they were in CofS. Then they kept the attitude after leaving CofS.
I've seen it. People are identified as "dangerous" "trouble makers" and so on and they go after them just the way they did when they were still sucking DM's cock.
People post in accordance with their respective frames of reference. That's all it is. Someone may believe something you don't think is true- and maybe they truly are wrong- and discuss it, but that does not make it spin.
There are billions of people in the world who lead responsible lives, pay taxes, etc, but who also believe some very odd things.
I'm not saying these things can't or shouldn't be debated. IMO, anyone who comes to a critical forum, even a nice one like this, can expect to have their views challenged and discussed. (though that applies to those of critical inclination, too) But the personalized commentary doesn't contribute to any debate.
One can be pretty scathing and indicate great disagreement with matters Scientological without the negative personalization. Truefax.
Interesting quotes of yours Fluffy. Call people cocksuckers yet a plea for the opposite type of expression. Your hypocrisy as the Nanny Board Monitor And Protector For The Friends Of The Tech is quit funny. Very contrary posts that display a total lack of consistency and rife with a double standard. If that's the new modus operandi here of discussing, I can accommodate with similar language.