Do you recommend people do OT 3? Without Incident 1 there is no OT 3.
Scientologists have been lying about "OT 3" since 1968. It hasn't changed.
It wasn't Hubbard who wanted to do a pilot. The idea was shot down. And it wasn't by Miscavige. Guess who shot it down.
You're promoting a dishonest subject with a bridge that isn't a bridge that leads to varying degrees of induced mental illness.
If you don't think people should do OT 3, then stop promoting OT 3.
This 'OT III is metaphor' angle is a current Freezone PR handling that isn't fooling anyone.
If OT III isn't true, why sell it to people?
Do they explain before people buy it, that it isn't true?
No, they don't.