Krautfag
Patron Meritorious
Ok, Carmel.
But that sounds self-defeating.
You want it done, but you won't assist people (like me) to it being done.
It's not about wanting to assist, we can't assist or we spoil your submission and make it void.
If someone asked me for FACTS (not opinions) I'd answer him with facts.
If someone asks me for opinions I'll answer to him with opinions.
You got it the wrong way around
They want an opinion based on facts, i.e. write your opinion and tell them the facts that have brought you to that opinion.
I won't be nattering. And I won't be nattering in submission
Perhaps, I don't understand the word "submission" itself as of now. Prior to that, to me it seemed that "submission" entails personal vision yet based on SPECIFICS - about particular problem.
Oh, its politics afterall, its okay to be a bit natterly
Anyway, you got the submission thing right. They do WANT your personal view, your opinion. You don't even have to base it on fact, if you can, all the better.
The particular problem problem here is the tax law though, not Scientology in the first place.[/QUOTE]
I don't see No reason here to denying questionnaire.
If you want make for yourself, that is perfectly fine.
BUT it has to be for yourself alone, what they really want is your OWN personal opinion, not influenced by anyone, the things that go through your mind, not the result of some team work.
Now, if we just publish a guideline, what to say, what questions to answer etc, they are not interested anymore.
See?