What's new

What are your views on psychiatry?

FlunkYou

Patron with Honors
What are your views on psychiatric medications? The reason I ask is because every time there's a mass shooting, the scn'ers immediately run to the psych link of the shooter. "He was on such-and-such drug and that's why he did it."

However, I see it as a double edged sword. If the guy needed to be on meds, and wasn't (like Jeremy Perkins) it still happens. And, if he was on meds and still murdered, maybe they weren't the right ones..or right dose?

I know the 2 kids in Columbine - one was on a low dose of something, and the other wasn't on anything at all. And Ted Bundy, one of the most famous mass-murders was a drunk, but not on meds.

The scientologist will one-for-one say it all boils down to psych meds, which I can see in SOME cases...especially the kids as there is a higher risk of suicide/murder because of their underdevelopment at the younger ages. (at least that's my understanding)

What are your thoughts??
 

PirateAndBum

Gold Meritorious Patron
I think marijuana should be legalized.

IMO, none of those insane massacres would have happened if the doers were smokin the evil weed.
 
... What are your thoughts??

Psychiatric meds, like any meds, address mechanisms and symptoms. They are not cures. In many cases they can alleviate a condition enough so a person can lead a relatively "normal" life. The condition still persists, but some of the worst aspects may be ameliorated by the meds. For many this can make a miraculous difference in their quality of life.

However, just because symptoms may have eased does not mean the condition itself no longer exists. One of the common failings with treatment involves a person coming off their meds because they have been working and he "feels fine" and then subsequently suffering a severe episode which is not as responsive to treatment.

In some cases the meds themselves can produce a result contrary to that which was intended. As one common instance, treating bipolar individuals suffering from severe depression with antidepressants can result in attempted suicide. However, left untreated bipolar depression can be unbearable.

Biochemistry is tricky. Brain chemistry especially so. Nor are their interactions fully understood by medicine. For the most part they remain a "best guess" sort of treatment. Accordingly it's very important that a person understands both the nature of the problem to be treated and the implications of any proposed course of treatment. Whether meds should be taken or not is a decision that must be taken by a person in consultation with competent medical advisors.


Mark A. Baker
 
in 1975 and again in 1980 i was incarcerated without warrant in psychiatric facilities and subjected to coerced drugging and "behavioural engineering" which twice drove me to attempt suicide

my father was twice given ECT and died in his mid-fifties

psychiatry is mostly bad medicine commonly used for political reasons
 

Helena Handbasket

Gold Meritorious Patron
I used to think that psychs were the devil incarnate. After all, towards the end of my last lifetime, I was f****d over by psychiatrists but good.

However, my view has mellowed out. Although I still don't believe emotional problems can always be solved with a pill, now I no longer believe that those problems can always be solved functionally (auditing, objectives, personal ethics, talk therapy in general, and what-not) either. Perhaps a combination approach is best but I am not an expert and a lot depends upon the individual.

Scientology has long been critical of drugs, including such perfectly legal drugs like alcohol and aspirin. And why? They say it's because drugs are temporary relief at best and they make it harder, once you decide to get auditing, to handle the charge terminatedly. But now I believe the real reason is that if you find relief in a pill you won't come into the org and speak to the registrar about getting auditing. Scientology hates competition.

There is still one thing I still very much dislike about psychiatry in general. They have the authority to pick you up and "take you away" simply because they decide it's in someone's best interest to do so. You have no right to simply say no. Like the right to legal abortion (in the first trimester let's say), the right to say no to psychiatric treatment has to have no exceptions to be meaningful at all.

Many years ago, the City of Berkeley made shock treatment (ECT) illegal and punishable by fine. Although this was a step in the right direction, the State of California stepped in and overruled them on jurisdictional grounds.

Life is there to be lived. Whatever gets you through it can't be a bad thing, assuming you're not hurting others in the process. Just today I had someone tell me the best solution is not to be born at all, but how can you prevent it? About the only way is by stopping sex and reproduction but of course 99% of all people would oppose that. And those 99% would have the advocate declared antisocial and psychotic and would have same committed to a psychiatric ward. Which brings this post back to where it started.

This universe is set up to be an almost never-ending cycle of birth, living life, creating new life, dying, and coming back to do it all over again whether you want to or not. Which makes for an interesting existence, but one that is not very pleasant at some times. The only way out is by getting out of the physical universe altogether, but I don't want to get into that discussion at this time. Let's just say it's theoretically possible, but extremely difficult.

Until something changes, keeping away from destructive psychiatric interventions is just one more thing, like avoiding speeding tickets, that we all need to worry about from time to time. Just one more thing that keeps life interesting.

Helena
 

Idle Morgue

Gold Meritorious Patron
Psychiatry really does not know much more about the mind than Blubbard. I am against drugging (side effect are horrible) because it covers up the problem. I understand drugging because I was in so much pain after coming out of the cult and realizing that I had been duped, I could have used a little relief - It was such horrible state to be in. It is better but it ain't done....I still have emotional pain regarding the betrayal. I am working through it and it is getting better.

Thank god, I did not do drugs or drink - I just faced it and read everything I could get my hands on to understand what happened.

I think mind control is very dangerous - the side effects are all over this board!

Who cares about what scientology thinks or says about anything. They have lost all credibility and do nothing to help anyone...all they do is hurt. In fact, their lack of help and duping people is do much worse than the drugs. At least those have a "black box warning".

I think there are tons of good philosophy's and spiritual paths to get relief out there - one can get help. The key is to take responsibility and that is tough some times. I have always done that long before the cult and my life has been relatively good!

As far as the shootings - I think there is something to the "killing" games and videos these kids played their entire childhood. Couple that with parents that treat their kiids like the second coming....Range Rovers, Cell phones - they don't even know what it is like to work for something. The stuff on television is just immoral. That has a lot to do with the declining moralities in our civilization or lack thereof. IMHO!
 

uniquemand

Unbeliever
My views are completely aligned with "Jock" McLaren's.

[video=youtube;eeEx1MqqE7M]http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=eeEx1MqqE7M[/video]
 

OhMG

Patron Meritorious
Not a thought but, a fact; There has never been a mass civil shooter that was NOT a user of heavy mind altering drugs. If you can apply logic, you come to an inescapable conclusion. If you are illogical, you ask silly questions.
 

Adam7986

Declared SP
I didn't read the entire thread, but since I recently started on Ativan and Zoloft I figured I would weigh in.

I was diagnosed with PTSD and depression. I have a problem with anxiety in my daily life. I have panic attacks, I have problems focusing and I tend to overreact and even become belligerent.

The meds I am taking have helped me out with those symptoms a lot. I can sleep normally and even though I have vivid dreams they aren't nightmares anymore. I can function at work and I am more confident and assertive. I can interact with people more now without getting annoyed or nervous. I am also more willing to leave the house and actually do things now. Where before I just wanted to lay in bed all day and do nothing because I was just too sad.

I've only been on the meds for a couple of weeks, but they are making a marked difference for the better in my life. I am really able to live a higher quality of life and enjoy my life more now because of them. We'll see if that continues in the future, but I can't see it suddenly getting worse.
 
I didn't read the entire thread, but since I recently started on Ativan and Zoloft I figured I would weigh in.

I was diagnosed with PTSD and depression. I have a problem with anxiety in my daily life. I have panic attacks, I have problems focusing and I tend to overreact and even become belligerent.

The meds I am taking have helped me out with those symptoms a lot. I can sleep normally and even though I have vivid dreams they aren't nightmares anymore. I can function at work and I am more confident and assertive. I can interact with people more now without getting annoyed or nervous. I am also more willing to leave the house and actually do things now. Where before I just wanted to lay in bed all day and do nothing because I was just too sad.

I've only been on the meds for a couple of weeks, but they are making a marked difference for the better in my life. I am really able to live a higher quality of life and enjoy my life more now because of them. We'll see if that continues in the future, but I can't see it suddenly getting worse.
Antidepressants work wonders for some people, I know several people who take them and have very positive results similar to yours, unfortunately they do not work for everyone and tend to be over prescribed mainly because it's far less expensive to write a prescription than it is to engage in therapy. Consequently people who do not respond to antidepressants usually just end up getting prescribed a different anti-depressent every time they visit their doctor and never end up getting any better.
 

Bill

Gold Meritorious Patron
Not a thought but, a fact; There has never been a mass civil shooter that was NOT a user of heavy mind altering drugs. If you can apply logic, you come to an inescapable conclusion. If you are illogical, you ask silly questions.
Sorry, I don't buy "never". You'll have to come up with a list of all civil shooters and then the evidence that they were all taking "mind-altering drugs". It just might be true, but I tend to doubt such absolute statements without any evidence at all.

Sounds like CCHR propaganda.
 

uniquemand

Unbeliever
My college had a wonderful school shooter named Wayne Lo. I don't remember if he did any drugs, but he definitely listened to shitty punk rock like "Orange 9mm" and "Sick of it All". He killed one of my favorite professors.
 

Jay Pea

Patron with Honors
I'm thinking this is a loaded question since Hubbard, and his heir-apparents, were fighting and competing with established mental health practices. If scientology is truly a religion, why wouldn't this thread be inquiring of "views" of Judaism, Muslim, Catholic, Methodist, Buddist, Presbyterian, Hindu, etc.

Odd to any one here?
 

guanoloco

As-Wased
My views are completely aligned with "Jock" McLaren's.

[video=youtube;eeEx1MqqE7M]http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=eeEx1MqqE7M[/video]

Coincidental that he quotes Karl Popper - really has nothing to do with this thread or anything but that's the 2nd Karl Popper quote I've run across today.

Here they are:

"We all remember how many religious wars were fought for a religion of love
and gentleness; how many bodies were burned alive with the genuinely kind
intention of saving souls from the eternal fire of hell."​

I especially like that one in reference to Scientology. How many "comm lines" are cut in order to have TOTAL FREEDOM, which, of course, could be defined as unlimited access to ALL comm lines?

Then there's this one.

"The method of science is bold conjectures and stringent attempts at their refutation."​

That's a reverse-barometer to what Scientology method there is.
 

Lori

Cheryl E Love
I didn't read the entire thread, but since I recently started on Ativan and Zoloft I figured I would weigh in.

I was diagnosed with PTSD and depression. I have a problem with anxiety in my daily life. I have panic attacks, I have problems focusing and I tend to overreact and even become belligerent.

The meds I am taking have helped me out with those symptoms a lot. I can sleep normally and even though I have vivid dreams they aren't nightmares anymore. I can function at work and I am more confident and assertive. I can interact with people more now without getting annoyed or nervous. I am also more willing to leave the house and actually do things now. Where before I just wanted to lay in bed all day and do nothing because I was just too sad.

I've only been on the meds for a couple of weeks, but they are making a marked difference for the better in my life. I am really able to live a higher quality of life and enjoy my life more now because of them. We'll see if that continues in the future, but I can't see it suddenly getting worse.


I too was diagnosed with PTSD. Every symptom you described also affected me! A family mrmber finally drug me out of my house and insisted I see someone. Although she did prescribe s very low dose of Paxil she also was facinated about my years in Scientology. What a difference it made!

That was almost a year ago. I am now off all meds (except what I saved and took last Saturday to get thru that horrendous fiasco called LRH Birthday event!!) :whistling: :eyeroll: :innocent:

I now go in once a week to talk things out and update her on whats happening. She is now reading Jenna's book and plans on reading Blown for Good next. Thank goodness I can now "lend" my kindle books. :hifive:

Perhaps my experience is an exception but it does show to me there are good "Psyches" out there who do care.:yes:
 
What are your views on psychiatric medications? The reason I ask is because every time there's a mass shooting, the scn'ers immediately run to the psych link of the shooter. "He was on such-and-such drug and that's why he did it."

However, I see it as a double edged sword. If the guy needed to be on meds, and wasn't (like Jeremy Perkins) it still happens. And, if he was on meds and still murdered, maybe they weren't the right ones..or right dose?

I know the 2 kids in Columbine - one was on a low dose of something, and the other wasn't on anything at all. And Ted Bundy, one of the most famous mass-murders was a drunk, but not on meds.

The scientologist will one-for-one say it all boils down to psych meds, which I can see in SOME cases...especially the kids as there is a higher risk of suicide/murder because of their underdevelopment at the younger ages. (at least that's my understanding)

What are your thoughts??

Scn'ers have been conditioned to view psychiatry as an evil , an enemy , so I think in the most there is no actual analysis. It is a conditioned response.
 

Teanntás

Silver Meritorious Patron
Not a thought but, a fact; There has never been a mass civil shooter that was NOT a user of heavy mind altering drugs. If you can apply logic, you come to an inescapable conclusion. If you are illogical, you ask silly questions.

"There has never been a mass civil shooter that was NOT a user of heavy mind altering drugs"

There is a high logical likelihood of such a statement being false.

Here's just one incident and there's no indication of mind-altering drugs being involved

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Howard_Unruh

"A series of uncoordinated mass stabbings, hammer attacks, and cleaver attacks in the People's Republic of China began in March 2010. The spate of attacks left at least 25 dead and some 115 injured. Analysts have blamed mental health problems caused by rapid social change for the rise in these kind of mass murder and murder-suicide incidents.[1]"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/School_attacks_in_China_(2010–12)
 

Mellyn

New Member
I had major depression a bit over a decade ago. It was mostly due to a situation I was going through at the time, and I completely shut down.

My doctor referred me to a psychologist. My doctor also mentioned antidepressants. I said no.

I went to the psychologist. She said that she'd work with me either way, but that through her own observation, people who did use antidepressants made better progress. I decided that since everyone else in my life was trying to help, I should at least give it a go. So I said okay.

I was referred to a psychiatrist. He worked in conjunction with the psychologist - she and I worked through cognitive behavioural therapy while I took the drugs. I saw the psychiatrist about every 6 weeks to evaluate my dosage. I saw the psychologist a couple of times a week. I was told that there was a forseeable end date for the drugs, that I wouldn't be on them forever - but that they recommended I stay on them for at least a year as that would lessen the likelihood of rebound.

The drugs gave a more immediate effect than the therapy. I could get up in the morning, I could do stuff. The side effects weren't much fun, but I was functioning far better than I had been beforehand. I honestly believe that the drugs brought me up to a place where I could function, to a place where I could get better.

I was only on them for about 8 months. I've never needed them again, nor further therapy. I never felt pressured. But I did recognise that they were an equaliser - that is, they brought me to a mid-point. They brought me up if I was down, but they brought me down if I was up. And that's ultimately why I went off them earlier than was recommended. The therapy had given me the tools to deal with the real problems, and with similar problems in the future.

Different things work for different people - different drugs, different therapies. I was lucky enough to get a combination that worked for me. I do think that psych drugs are often misprescribed - often by general practitioners who don't have the specialised knowledge that a psychiatrist has trained in, and often not in combination with therapy which I think is important to treat the root cause. But psychiatry is not an exact science even at the best of times.

I'm not, and never have been scientologist. I don't expect everyone to have the same opinion or experience. But I don't know that I'd still be around without psychiatry and I'm grateful for the fact that I am.
 

The_Fixer

Class Clown
in 1975 and again in 1980 i was incarcerated without warrant in psychiatric facilities and subjected to coerced drugging and "behavioural engineering" which twice drove me to attempt suicide

my father was twice given ECT and died in his mid-fifties

psychiatry is mostly bad medicine commonly used for political reasons

I respectfully disagree here.

You have had negative experiences here and I accept that you would have this viewpoint as a result. It is quite understandable, especially when coupled with previous Scientology indoctrination.

Psychiatry in 1975 was a different animal to today. It was different to the 50s, 30s and the 1800s. Yes, it is still imperfect and sometimes to a significant degree. But there are ongoing researches and treatments are modified according to the outcomes of these studies. That suggests evolution of a science.

Scientology only accepts its own flawed theories and will not change a thing (except for marketing strategies). The ego of the church will not permit effective change in case it brings itself down or becomes effective. That's pretty obvious to most of us here. Scientology does nothing for folks with mental conditions either. Let them die and we'll pick it up next lifetime. Sorry folks, but for me, that attitude is not good enough nor right.

Which only leaves psychiatry to deal with the mentally damaged. Who the hell do the church think they are criticising psychiatry when they do Dr. Do Fuck All themselves? (He's worse than Dr Dolittle)..

Take them off their drugs and add to the problems?

ECT is still used today. But it is done a lot different now. All parties (in Australia), including the patient, consent to the procedure and it is only used now where it may be pretty much an only option and under anaesthesia. It is generally used as a last resort thing when other treatments have produced little result and it is not considered practical in many cases anymore. It is usually avoided. Many people have attested to positive results in these cases. No, I am not aware of negatives at this time.

Drugs are used to control certain conditions. I concur with Mark Baker's previous post. Sure, the pros get it wrong sometimes. It happens. Happens in every field. Perfection is an illusion, yet Scientology expects it of others but ignore that on themselves. Hypocrisy in action.

Mental illness is an imperfect science. It rarely presents perfect casebook diagnoses. People are different and respond to tings differently. It often means these people are subjected to a range of treatments before they find the right one for them, if they can be helped. Some really cannot be.

Drugs can help people to function without having to be locked up. Seems to be a better option to me.

I feel here personally that a lot of the resistance to psychiatry comes from church indoctrination and not necessarily personal experiences or rational research.

I am not dismissing your experiences CB, as I said from what you experienced you have an understandable reaction to the subject. But I feel you need to revisit the whole deal with a different viewpoint if it doesn't cause you too much pain.

I would like to know how many people this profession are really helping as opposed to how many they are harming. By facts though, not opinions.

Psychiatry has been used both politically and militarily throughout the ages. It doesn't necessarily mean it is the core of it as far as I'm concerned. Sometimes good things come from these aspects as well.

At least someone is trying to do something for sufferers and not just stick them on some desert island to fade away like they used to.

Schizophrenics, Bipolar and anxiety sufferers, to name a few cannot survive without medication and psychiatric support. I personally could not let these people be cast away like trash like Scientologists would and feel right about it. They are after all, human beings too with a right to a life...
 

The_Fixer

Class Clown
Antidepressants work wonders for some people, I know several people who take them and have very positive results similar to yours, unfortunately they do not work for everyone and tend to be over prescribed mainly because it's far less expensive to write a prescription than it is to engage in therapy. Consequently people who do not respond to antidepressants usually just end up getting prescribed a different anti-depressent every time they visit their doctor and never end up getting any better.

Yeah, that's true too.

As is often said - There are doctors, and there are Doctors...
 
Top