Uhhhh, who's calling "everyone" who's not on message OSA? Not me.
Well you just did it to me, and I've seen it happen dozens of times, especially on OCMB, to other people who are 100% in no way OSA and no rational person could believe they were. Think that looks good to people looking in to scientology via those channels?
This very board, and Emma were smeared as OSA op's, and I don't even think half of those involved really actually believed that. It seems it's like their idea of fun or something, because it's certainly not something I can rationalise in any sensible way. Arnie "it's OSA" Lerma ran an op on this board using Steven Von Hatten. That's a matter of record.
But I do strongly suspect that you are an OSA operative, based on my analysis of your words and reports I have received regarding your posting activities here.
Really? Wow.
Furthermore, I find it veeerrrrrry interesting that you have an idea that the "critical movement" could be looking badly. Why would you think that?!? The critical movement is just fine, it's largely united like never before and Anonymous has meant a huge influx of numbers into the movement and they are assimilating with 99% percent ease. There are no PR problems with the Critical Movement... unless your viewpoint on it is OSA. hhmmmmmmmm
See my first paragraph.*
So, what is your story neiljung? Have you posted it here? Anywhere? :confused2: Anybody here know you? Surely there must be someone here who can vouch for your bona fides... someone you are transparent to back-channel... someone who knew you when you were in?
Please tell us, neiljung: what is your hat?
.
My only involvement was peripheral and getting some book one auditing back in my teens. I did self-identify as a scientologist for a short time and yes, my auditing sessions got filed at the Edinburgh org but I've never been a card carrying member. I lived 70 miles from there and was a minor. I'm fascinated by many forms of spiritual technology and do think there is some merit in a lot of the ideas that encompass scientology. The church itself is a lost cause though.
If I'm guilty of anything it's being a bit of a dick at times. I sometimes say unpopular things that I personally think are true, and I sometimes joke about things that might be a little off-colour. Nothing is sacred to me. I know I step on toes and piss people off at times. I've done it all my life, and a big part of me would like to change that as it's not like there's anything to be gained from it! Like I said, it's my nature.
Maybe scientology can help me with that. :wink2:
*EDIT: By the way, I bit my tongue pretty hard on a couple of points, and made several omissions of information, purely for the reason that I don't see anything constructive that could come from bringing them to light. You can thank me later.
Ohhh, I get it! jeeeezz OSA... is that the best you can do?!? Send this guy here to natter about critics?!
