JustSheila
Crusader
...
You are quite right.
But you have stopped short in your observation. Your quote is not only true about Scientology 2016, it is true about Scientology auditing since day one.
I would agree that there are moments that auditing produced "benefits". However, those moments are engulfed, eclipsed and eradicated by the ocean of "non-beneficial" (i.e. harmful) auditing.
The proof of what I am saying is this: If auditing worked to a person's benefit (only), there would not be a 99% blow rate of Scientologists.
You are SO right, HH!
The most convincing argument against scientology is finding out that the most dedicated of all of them, those with the highest training, case levels or org positions and those with the most time spent living and breathing scientology were most often the biggest liars and scammers, the most abusive, the most selfish, the most blindly egotistical, the most self-righteous, the most arrogant, biggest jerks with the least conscience and became the least able to think for themselves.
When I was still new to Scientology, I used to see SO execs that were particularly cruel and ask around about their case levels or training levels, convinced in my head that they just had reactive minds or whatever that hadn't been handled. Then I stopped asking, because their cruelty, lying or abusing staff and individuals and endless excuses for such behavior seemed to be directly related to 'time in Scientology.' These were the 'OT's', these were the highly trained.
Fact is, they never got better. They never got nicer, they never got more understanding or humane. They became increasingly more stupid, unable to see past canned Hubbardism phrases and ridiculous solutions and understand org problems, and completely stopped understanding human relationship problems. The longer one stays in scientology, the meaner one gets. The longer one is out, the more humane and understanding one gets.
We can graph this.




