What's new

What is the first clue you see that some one is a scientologist ?

Gizmo

Rabble Rouser
Re: What is the WORST clue you see that some one is a scientologist ?

They are " DECLARED " !
came from
" DECLARE "

But, hey wait a freakin second, that some one DECLARES something had no bearing on any investigation, proof, or truth !

I DECLARE the moon is blue cheese. Now, HTF do a group of people fall in line & believe - plus spread to others - that the moon is blue cheese ?

Seems like the old :

"Hubbard it
I believe it
that settles it !"


got morphed into :

"My Cherch saids it
I believes it
that settles it forever !


I declare that is the best moon pie I ever ate !

I declare my declare is declared !

Or, in Hubbard-speak...

blah blah de blah de blah burp de wop da do do blah who whaaaa blah bloop.

Please, no one will get sick from hearing that secret sacred lore as given in the line above !

<><><><><><><><><>

I almost forgot another dead certain give away ! The F word will be sprinkled in at least 20 times a minute as they speak. It is as if they are incapable of forming a sentence with multiple use of the F word.

They use the F word more than sailors . . . . . or teenyboppers.
 
Last edited:

The_Fixer

Class Clown
Ayup.

When talking about politics and data, my kids often use the phrase "cherry-picking cheater". Our non-sequitur is "I like pi" - an inside math joke.

Speaking of math jokes, what do you get when you cross an elephant with a grape?

OK, I'll bite...... no idea.

When some one talks about ending or end cycle. That one kinda grates.
 

Gizmo

Rabble Rouser
Re: Do scientologiss really accept the spiritual nature of their fellow peoples ?

OK, I'll bite...... no idea.

When some one talks about ending or end cycle. That one kinda grates.

I've become fond of . . . . . . . croak.

Silly anyway. If one believes they are spiritual in essence & have been around long before & will be long after - I just don't get " ending or end cycle " as even in that piss ant little cult they believe the body is something one has but not what one is.

Sooner or later a body is going to croak. Not a big deal as one can so easily stay in touch with those who have transitioned.

Well, those who really belive in the spititual nature of seem to be able to . . . . . can scn'gists ?
 

JustSheila

Crusader
Re: Some thoughts

Actually, that's the one piece of scieno-speak I've picked up, for just that usage: total sarcasm.

My kids tell me something utterly gross? Thank you for telling me that. Now go get on your homework / instrument / project to blow up the house.

Total batshit crazy from one of my back home Tea Party Redneck friends? Thank you for telling me that. Now go read the fucking Constitution and tell me what it really says.

I do find myself really watching my usage of "handle" these days, though. AAAARGGH. This shit's like a case of the intellectual clap. :yes:

As for 2d, yep, it's cold, but I liked the pithiness and brevity. Replaces significant other, works for either gender or sexual orientation.

Thank you for telling me that, Claire.

(Sorry! I couldn't resist! :hide: I don't like the term "2D" at all!)
 

La La Lou Lou

Crusader
Re: Some thoughts

Thank you for telling me that, Claire.

(Sorry! I couldn't resist! :hide: I don't like the term "2D" at all!)

2D terminal is even worse.

2d is tuppence, 2D is flat, not in the round and terminal is cancer or ebola, I don't want a 2D terminal I want a lover.
 

HelluvaHoax!

Platinum Meritorious Sponsor with bells on
...

Sometimes a Scientologist (who doesn't have any possible clue that I am a Scientologist) is having normal conversation and suddenly something just sort of slips out. . .

It comes from nowhere. . .

Unexpected. . .

Unpredicted. . .

Without any rational explanation. . .

An expression that the Scientologist is entirely clueless is not a "normal English expression". . .

Like. . .

"Grant Beingness"
(they're deep, wayyyyyy deep, into the cult.
so deep that their knowingness doesn't know)


I haven't got time to dig it up now, but later I'll post the granddaddy of all Scieno-Slips where a famous SP gets an OSA OT so flustered that they actually beg for the SP to grant them beingness. I ain't makin it up folks.
 

Intentionally Blank

Scientology Widow
I remember when Mr/s Blanky and I were first dating I met a friend from the org who made some comment about "granting beingness" and, forgetting to censor my bluntness, I said something to the effect of how arrogant it seemed that I could grant anyone beingness .... as if it was within my power to allow or deny another person existence or value The friend got all flustered and insisted I wasn't properly understanding the phrase.

Another for the list: "affinity"

I used to have affinity for affinity. It was a good word. :bigcry:

And now that I'm thinking about all the words the cult of scientology has perverted ..... introverted is another that annoys me. I couldn't quite believe my ears the first time I heard someone say "oh she's become introverted by that experience and we need to get her into present time and looking outside herself." Might've been the same "granting beingness" friend now that I write that. I probably said something equally wog like that time too. I preach the gospel of brain function differences for intro and extroversion every chance I get.

Oh criminey and "present time"

Sheesh. Poor culties, they can't get through a sentence without giving it away.

Blanky
 

La La Lou Lou

Crusader
I used the word 'randomity' in a conversation with a philosophy tutor once in University, he looked at me as if I was an incontinent penguin, and said that it was 'word abuse'. :no:
 

Intentionally Blank

Scientology Widow
I used the word 'randomity' in a conversation with a philosophy tutor once in University, he looked at me as if I was an incontinent penguin, and said that it was 'word abuse'. :no:

I don't allow that (not a ) word in my hearing.


Makes me wonder - is scientology responsible for the terrible abomination "impactful"?
 

Udarnik

Gold Meritorious Patron
I don't allow that (not a ) word in my hearing.


Makes me wonder - is scientology responsible for the terrible abomination "impactful"?

Nope, but I bet it's responsible for some impacted bowels. :yes:

(Once again, don't click that link. Just don't. Unless you're one of the lecturers at my recent round of lunch 'n learns. You fuckers always pull out the diseased vagina slides just when I'm about to bite into my sandwich. You deserve to click it.)
 

DonkeyOT

Patron
This thread is so full of outpoints and such a departure from the ideal scene, I'm going to write you up and slam in your ethics.

You're as A to J as alphabet soup, frozen at the controls like a Chinese pilot, MUs up the ass.
 

Knows

Gold Meritorious Patron
"Handle"

"On lines"

"Get in communication"

I never use the word handle. Ever. I hate it. :melodramatic:

Yes, Yes, Yes!!

My ears perk up when ever I hear someone say those words.

In addition to those, these words and phrases have become engrams to me

"Okay, Good!"

"Cool"

"Fair enough"

"I Got it"

'Spot on"

"I understand"
 
Last edited:

HelluvaHoax!

Platinum Meritorious Sponsor with bells on
"Give someone the R factor" on something. I haven't heard anyone other than a scientologist use that expression.


And the funny thing is that Scientologists (although the only ones on this planet who use the term "R-factor") are not factually able to give an R-factor.

Because that requires "R".

Scientologists are, however, extraordinarily capable of giving an out-R-factor.
 
Top