For starters, whatever Scientology is, it's not a religion. Calling it a religion eliminates any chance that Scientology will change. Why should it? Its "religion angle" and "religious cloaking" have succeeded - proof that deception works, so why change?
"This is a cold blooded and factual account of your last sixty trillions years," L. Ron Hubbard, 1952
In Scientology, "theta" means life force, elan vital, and harmonious, serene, and affirming and validating of Scientology, and true; and entheta means anti-life, and turbulent, upsetting, and critical and invalidating of Scientology, and false.
And Scientology is "Mankind's only hope."
L. Ron Hubbard, on inventing facts, from an April 1955 'HCOB':
"A datum is an invention which has become agreed upon and solidified... When it is thoroughly agreed upon it becomes, then, a truth.
"The word 'lie' is simply 'an invention with a bad connotation'... Thus society frowns upon the invention of facts."
And this from the loose-lipped 1952 'PDC' lectures, "It's a trap not being able to prevaricate."
And then there's the old reliable, 'TR-L', the Training Routine for Lying from the 1960s.
And, of course, there's the first half of the Fair Game Law, "Trick and lie to.", also from 1960s.
And then there's Scientology's multi-layered PR Tech of the early 1970s, which, per the pattern, dishonestly announces its own honesty while, further in, instructs on how to manipulate, and further in still, instructs on how to mislead and lie.
These things are as much a part of Scientology as the "auditing comm cycle," and discharging tension by finding "earlier similars" (wording is Korzybski's), and these ingredients, along with others, combine - per the founder's design - making Scientology.
In Scientology, lying is only supposed to flow downward, with Hubbard free to lie to Scientologists, but Scientologists expected to comply, and to open their minds completely to inspection.
It shouldn't be surprising that a 'Good Scientologist' is willing to lie to those he sees as below him: the "DBs," "SPs," and the "Wogs."
It's quite a system: an 'applied philosophy' that make liars out of good people, who - themselves - have been lied to.
The first step to unraveling this mess is to describe it.
And "DM bad," "LRH good" is *not* describing it.