Pip
Patron with Honors
Before I got involved in Scientology I had never thought much about understanding. And as for the concept of understanding understanding, that idea had never occurred to me.
So when I learned in Scientology that the component parts of understanding were Affinity, Reality and Communication, this seemed as logical as the laws of floatation described by Archimedes.
Although I have Googled 'understanding understanding' which produced some interesting results, nothing came up that in any way suggested the laws governing understanding, and yet what I learned throught the writing of LRH seem to suggest that A.R.C. indeed does equal understanding.
I would be interested to hear from anyone who can direct me to an earlier source that states the component parts of understanding.
So when I learned in Scientology that the component parts of understanding were Affinity, Reality and Communication, this seemed as logical as the laws of floatation described by Archimedes.
Although I have Googled 'understanding understanding' which produced some interesting results, nothing came up that in any way suggested the laws governing understanding, and yet what I learned throught the writing of LRH seem to suggest that A.R.C. indeed does equal understanding.
I would be interested to hear from anyone who can direct me to an earlier source that states the component parts of understanding.