IMO, there are many things that might be regarded as (Scientology term) "exteriorization." Hubbard made millions promising people "exteriorization with full perception," "stably and at will." Scientology didn't deliver, and Scientology regs and PR people have been weasel-wording their way out of that for decades (usually after the person has spent his money on the "OT levels" and been disappointed.)
In 'DMSMH', the word "exteriorization" is used to mean a kind of disassociation with regard to recall: the person recalls having burned his finger on a hot toaster in a kitchen, and sees his body in the kitchen as though exterior from it. This was not regarded as being out of the body, but a tendency to remember by re-creating the incident in ones mind rather than simply viewing the actual facsimiles of the event, which would have the person experiencing the event from inside his head and not seeing himself from outside. To "run" the incident properly, it would be necessary to bring the person "in valence," so he/she could view the facsimiles of the incident as-is, and not as a re-created version produced by his/her imagination.
The above 1950 Dianetic use of "exteriorization" is largely disregarded, as Scientologists are usually eager to "have gone exterior." IMO, much of the time this is group-pressure and wishful thinking.
As with the process of abreaction
http://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/abreaction , psychical phenomena (or interest in it)
http://www.forum.exscn.net/showpost.php?p=239573&postcount=60 is exploited by Scientology, so it's a very mixed up situation - probably a dozen items are classed as the state of being "exterior."
There's what could be called a state of psychological dissociation; the there's being in one's body yet extending a kind of etheric finger and touching or perceiving remotely, while still being "in the body"; then there's being a golf ball sized etheric amoeba popping out of the body; then there's astral travel with an astral body which separates from the body, and a more rarefied "body" that separates from that. (This seems to be a missing bit of information in Scientology which sees astral bodies as "some mystic's delusion." ['Scn 8-8008']; and then there's the idea that one is naturally (as a "being") much larger than the body and that the body is
in oneself (or one's being) not the other way around.
Compare Robert Monroe's first out of body experience:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4MHBM8prTP8&feature=player_embedded
With L. Ron Hubbard talking about being up in the Van allen belt:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RaqQ4pXVypY
And some more stuff - for newbie lurkers...
Stanford Research Institute experimental psychologist Keith Harary, and Russell Targ, a physicist also from Stanford, wrote a book titled 'Mind Race' (as in 'space race'). It contains a section on the exploitation of psychic phenomena, or the promise of psychic phenomena, by cults.
Both were well aware of Scientology, and had worked with Ingo Swann, who did Scientology's "OT levels," and later (after leaving) described them as "disappointing." Swann claims to have been a natural psychic since childhood.
From the book, 'Mind Race':
"You won't find these groups listed under 'cults' in the Yellow pages. For income tax and public relations purposes, most refer to themselves as 'Churches'. But cults differ from traditional churches in several important ways...
"In our society, a person who is beginning to experience emerging psychic abilities, or who is interested in doing so, has almost nowhere to turn for guidance. Anyone with a purely scholarly interest in Psi research can write to various laboratories or read the research reports. But this information probably will not be of much practical personal use...
"This is the dilemma that leads many people to join cults in the first place. By accepting and exploiting psychic phenomena in a society that does not readily accept them, cults have effectively monopolized the subject of psi. They have exploited many people who are interested in learning about the area, and frightened many others away from ever considering the possibility...
"People are often drawn into cults that claim to offer explanations for psychic functioning, but at great personal, emotional, and financial expense to their followers. We think that giving away your mind is too high a price to pay for psychic development...
"For some people, the exposure to the possibility of developing their own psychic potential, which some cults appear to provide, may initially help certain individuals pay attention to areas of their own awareness that they might not otherwise consider exploring.
"But prolonged exposure to any cult's treatment of psychic abilities may seriously restrict the way its initiates view psychic functioning. And it may keep them from fully developing their actual psychic potential...
"Despite claims to the contrary by numerous factions, there is no evidence of an exclusive relationship between psychic functioning and any particular leader, doctrine , or way of life. Scientific evidence does strongly suggest that the ability to function psychically is a genuine human capacity which, for many people, seems to improve with practice."
Some links, in no particular order:
Rosicrucian telepathy:
http://books.google.com/books?id=o_...Ymuw7XF&sig=HNSwCEEHt2fDbDge2Iq82Y-Bl2M&hl=en
Video excerpt from the 'Bardo', with Leonard Cohen narrating. (Ending segment not from original. Video may stick at beginning; if so, try tweaking.)
"
Recognize them as a reflection of your own mind. Recognition and liberation are simultaneous."
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-212863829226111861&q=tibetan+book+of+the+dead
The 'Sole Source Myth' thread (derailed somewhat after page 4):
http://forum.exscn.net/showthread.php?t=510
Also, as an extra bonus, here's an exercise from the early 1900s that includes spanning attention, visualization (mock ups), specialized mock ups where a person attempts to place a mock up of the same size etc. as a physical object in the same space as the physical object, and projection of consciousness through the solar system.
It even warns about avoiding what amounts to "overrun."
(Note: "Nuit" - as used in the below link - denotes "Infinity.")
http://hermetic.com/crowley/libers/lib536.html
Handy navigational aid:
http://www.nasa.gov/vision/universe/solarsystem/voyager-interstellar-terms.html
'Exteriorization vs dissociation' thread:
http://www.forum.exscn.net/showthread.php?p=485387
'On being Exterior, your views?' thread:
http://www.forum.exscn.net/showthread.php?t=20613