Well . . . riddle me this: does Marty's contribution to this discussion make sense to a KSW Standard L Ron Hubbard Scientology Tech kool aid slurper? I've asked a couple of times about whether or not the MSM reaches into the Scilon consciousness in a "wake up" sort of way. Generally speaking, it seems not. "Freedom Magazine", on the other hand, is deemed a worthy organ of repute, a font of truth, apparently. Now, perhaps by ignoring our wog-world wailing and speaking directly to his "lurkers" Marty has struck a powerful blow against the one source of information Scilons trust. Perhaps the quavering doubters will recognise that if "Freedom Magazine" is all bullshit and ask themselves "since when"? Could the denigration of "Freedom Magazine" by Marty spark a question or two within the cult - might not a few more of them just check out the original article for themselves and commence to LOOK?
A slightly uncomfortable irony in this latest cult footbullet is that it is perfectly in line with Scientology Scripture and practise. It is the classic . . .
Scientology 101: In the face of indisputable facts and/or irrefutable logic, apply ad homs.
. . . not once does the smarmy vid ever specifically address the content of the article, its all about the author and the New Yorker and others. Nasty Scientology is nasty.
It is also a premeditated act of belligerent intolerance aimed specifically at a recognised human right - namely, freedom of speech - by an organisation that calls itself a Church.
Scientology - what have *you* got against human rights?