I ws lucky enough to find an early copy (the one with the makeshift bookjacket) on ebay and snapped it up.
I sort of read bits and pieces on the net over the years but never thoroughly.
So I am enjoying snuggling up in bed at night and sinking my teeth into this wonderful book.
There are a number of passages that I'd love to throw up for discussion, but I'll start with this one.
This is from Part 1, Chapter 9 - The brainwashing manual
I felt a literal kick in the guts when I read this.
It explained so much for me.
For the last 6 years I've wondered about the seeming contradiction of Scientology. How you could read something and be blown away by the beauty and simplicity of it, and experience real case gain from the realisations JUST from reading, yet once you left the sanctity of the courseroom, you were confronted with an Organisation of madness.
When "in" Scientology, I used to justify this madness by explaining it away as untrained admin terminals, group bank or something similar. But I slowly began to realise it was more than that, especially after a trip or two uplines for an ethics handling to a SO Org where the insanity was even worse. My excuses just didn't hold water after that.
Reading that passage made so much sense to me. To understand a little better how the trap was laid makes it easier to get out of.
I sort of read bits and pieces on the net over the years but never thoroughly.
So I am enjoying snuggling up in bed at night and sinking my teeth into this wonderful book.
There are a number of passages that I'd love to throw up for discussion, but I'll start with this one.
This is from Part 1, Chapter 9 - The brainwashing manual
From Brian Ambry's critique on Scientology:
While "white Scientology" (techniques and data which have the po-
tential to assist an individual to become more independent and self-
determined) is promoted by the Church as the Entirety of the subject,
there is also a dark side to Scientology. A dark side which makes indi-
viduals permanently dependent upon the Church, and, instead of self-
determined, "Ron-determined...."
The marriage of potentially liberating methodologies with enslaving
ones, the mixing of truth with lies, and love with hate: that is the
strange story of L. Ron Hubbard and his Church.*
Hubbard was a "user." He used freedom He used goodness. Help-
ing others feel better, understand more, communicate better - this
was all fine, so long as he considered that it increased his power.
He helped others so as to own them; to create gratitude and trust
and give himself authority or "altitude." He set up people to be ma-
nipulated by first assisting them to feel better to have "wins" and so
forth.
There are those who insist that all "gains" and "wins" in Scientology
are delusory - that all the counseling is brainwashing. That's nonsense.
The trap is much more sophisticated than that.
He was a man of many methods.
I felt a literal kick in the guts when I read this.
It explained so much for me.
For the last 6 years I've wondered about the seeming contradiction of Scientology. How you could read something and be blown away by the beauty and simplicity of it, and experience real case gain from the realisations JUST from reading, yet once you left the sanctity of the courseroom, you were confronted with an Organisation of madness.
When "in" Scientology, I used to justify this madness by explaining it away as untrained admin terminals, group bank or something similar. But I slowly began to realise it was more than that, especially after a trip or two uplines for an ethics handling to a SO Org where the insanity was even worse. My excuses just didn't hold water after that.
Reading that passage made so much sense to me. To understand a little better how the trap was laid makes it easier to get out of.