The History and Practice of R6EW

[Lesolee (Sith Lord)]

I hope you didn’t get your hopes up too much by reading the title of this post. I am asking questions here, not giving the answers.

I know there are posters here who have audited R6EW in the Co$, and probably some have C/Sed it as well. Perhaps some of these people would be willing to share their knowledge of The History and Practice of R6EW.

Let me start off by listing a few sources of this material that are currently available on the web …

Prometheus reports
Wikileaks: Power to Solo tech vol
MISC1_TEXT.txt < [email protected]>
R6EW course for Alethiology clearing practitioners

These sources have similarities and differences, as you might expect.

Prometheus does not give the procedure of R6EWS or R6EWP. Did the Co$ subsequently drop these two processes? (There are a couple of unidentified confidential bulletins listed elsewhere, dated 1971, which apparently relate to R6 material, but which are missing from the wikileak.)

A particularly important difference between the wikileak and Prometheus is the use of “UN-“ to get the matching EW. This is suggested in Prometheus as a possibility, much like the earlier bulletins in the wikileak. However the 23 May ’65 bulletin in the wikileak seems to make this procedure mandatory.

Comments and data please …

 

[degraded being]

I think this one has been done before. Have you checked previous threads on it?

 

[Lesolee (Sith Lord)]

Disappointing response so far

I haven't seen any other threads discussing the details of R6EW.

What happened to the other R6EW processes, R6EWS and R6EWP? :confused2:

 

[DartSmohen]

Disappointing response so far

I haven't seen any other threads discussing the details of R6EW.

What happened to the other R6EW processes, R6EWS and R6EWP? :confused2:

I did R6EW on level VI of SHSHC. It was an excellent action and led well into the CC. With all the "quickying" and the "many types of clear" fiasco, the procedure fell out of use.

Unfortunately, it was 40 years ago that I ran it. I remember having to write out the End Words on cards, but cannot relate the precise steps we did.

I am sure that there are correct references out there where the steps are properly laid out.

At the same time, having seen some of the proposed processes as described in the "Prometheus Report", it would be advisable to find other material references for the sake of accuracy.

Dart

 

[Dulloldfart]

At the same time, having seen some of the proposed processes as described in the "Prometheus Report", it would be advisable to find other material references for the sake of accuracy.

Dart

You mentioned supposed errors in the "Prometheus Reports" before, Dart, with regard to Power. Please give specifics (new thread). It's not like there is lot of choice online for this stuff. By "error" I mean divergence from Hubbard's writings, not divergence from reality.

Paul

 

[DartSmohen]

You mentioned supposed errors in the "Prometheus Reports" before, Dart, with regard to Power. Please give specifics (new thread). It's not like there is lot of choice online for this stuff. By "error" I mean divergence from Hubbard's writings, not divergence from reality.

Paul

I was specifically referring to one of the Power Process commands, and the removal of a key word.

As for the bulk of the Prometheus Report, I have no argument. I believe you went through the material yourself and found it to be mostly accurate. That is good enough for me.

Dart

 

[Dulloldfart]

I was specifically referring to one of the Power Process commands, and the removal of a key word.

As for the bulk of the Prometheus Report, I have no argument. I believe you went through the material yourself and found it to be mostly accurate. That is good enough for me.

Dart

OK, fair enough.

Paul

 

[Lesolee (Sith Lord)]

I did R6EW on level VI of SHSBC. It was an excellent action and led well into the CC.

Thanks for that Dart. Obviously us later SHSBC types never got to do it.

Do you have any vague recollection of how long it took (days, weeks, months)?

Any idea how many word pairs were involved? There was a mention of hundreds, but it was in a "dodgy" reference that mentions a CB meter. The LRH refs mention the first 20 hours being done on R6EW and then a later reference says there are many more endwords than last released.:confused2: I can't see the earlier released number in order to know what the "more than" is relative to. Besides, what does "many more" mean? Twice as many? Ten times as a many? :confused2:

DOF: having read through the wikileaks pack, there is a lot of information at variance with the Prometheus stuff. Prometheus seems to have been written from the earlier references, and not the many changes that occurred a few weeks later. As an example, antonyms are not used, just UN- in the later reference.

Curiously question 25 is missing from List 6EW in both wikileaks and Prometheus.

 

[DartSmohen]

Thanks for that Dart. Obviously us later SHSBC types never got to do it.

Do you have any vague recollection of how long it took (days, weeks, months)?

Any idea how many word pairs were involved? There was a mention of hundreds, but it was in a "dodgy" reference that mentions a CB meter. The LRH refs mention the first 20 hours being done on R6EW and then a later reference says there are many more endwords than last released.:confused2: I can't see the earlier released number in order to know what the "more than" is relative to. Besides, what does "many more" mean? Twice as many? Ten times as a many? :confused2:

On level VI it was run with a twofold idea in mind.

Firstly it was to give you the idea about solo auditing and secondly to run it as a procedure.

I must have ran it for about 5-6 hours. It blew quite a bit of stuff and I must say that I thought it was a significant level.

Mind you, by then I had been through hundreds of hours (enforced) of objectives, R1 and R2 processes. So I was quite well set up.

I can understand the problem those who ran "quickie" processes to a F/N would have. They never got into the "meat" of what was there, but just skimmed off the surface.

R6EW, the CC and OT2 came out of the GPM technology that was pioneered and run through the early 1960's at St Hill.

That is why the Games Matrix technology developed by Alan is so potent.

Dart.

 

[Lesolee (Sith Lord)]

On level VI it was run with a twofold idea in mind.

Firstly it was to give you the idea about solo auditing and secondly to run it as a procedure.

I must have ran it for about 5-6 hours. It blew quite a bit of stuff and I must say that I thought it was a significant level.

Mind you, by then I had been through hundreds of hours (enforced) of objectives, R1 and R2 processes.

Maybe I should ask you a question about this every day for a week. You know like the old Book One style. The file clerk will come up with a little bit more each day.

 

[Dulloldfart]

DOF: having read through the wikileaks pack, there is a lot of information at variance with the Prometheus stuff. Prometheus seems to have been written from the earlier references, and not the many changes that occurred a few weeks later. As an example, antonyms are not used, just UN- in the later reference.

Curiously question 25 is missing from List 6EW in both wikileaks and Prometheus.

I didn't have a whole lot to do with Power and R6EW at SH, so have very little personal experience with it other than a bit of casual chatting to people there. Sorry, can't help there.

Paul

 

[Smitty]

comment to DartSmohen

R6EW, the CC and OT2 came out of the GPM technology that was pioneered and run through the early 1960's at St Hill.
That is why the Games Matrix technology developed by Alan is so potent.
Dart.

The second statement is not sequitur to the first.
Also, the CC and OT2 are the embodiments of Hubbard's idea that certain implant GPMs exist and need to be run by everybody. A very evaluative and additive agenda.
I would hope that Alan has not repeated Hubbard's blunder and developed something based on such nonsense.

 

[Flag-2005]

R6EW, the CC and OT2 came out of the GPM technology that was pioneered and run through the early 1960's at St Hill.

That is why the Games Matrix technology developed by Alan is so potent.

Dart.

Are they similar or based on each other in some way?

 

[Leon]

My own experiences with it:

As a pc I loved it. It was a wonderful introduction into Solo auditing, a gentle process that shifted a LOT of fixed masses and cleaned me up in a way that other auditing didn't.

I did only the straightforward "What am I dramatising", boiled it down to a word that read huge, found the exact opterm word and the pair would blow. Big F/N VGIs.

On people I have put through the upper levels - currently one is on R6 - I have used this same approach. Key to success in it is to make sure they are running deep and not just their latest PTPs. The question should cover fixed patterns that have existed for this entire lifetime, get the guy to write down his description of it - lots of itsa on it - and when that is fully done only then boil it down to a single word that reads BIG. He/she must have personal certainty and VGIs that he has the right word. Then the opposite will come easily and the pair will blow. That's it for that session.

I normally have them stay with me until I see they are auditing correcty and reliably and then I let thenm go home to complete the level. The following is from a recent session report from my current solo person after she had been here -

"Hi Leo - I sent Candy a big news-y letter and hopefully she will share that with you, but I also wanted to tell you (I've been meaning to for months...) that the first session I did when I came home was so great, so . . . perfect. the pair was (xxxxxx) and (yyyyyy), and it just described a major part of what I've been doing and running into for the last 3 lifetimes so exactly, that for weeks and weeks after, everytime I would remember it I was start smiling and feeling free and happy, and lightly think, oh, I need to tell Leo, and then I would float off and forget to write. I couldn't even be bothered to check if it was a persistently floating needle, but it sure did feel like it."

That's what the process should do. Lovely big key-outs and the massiness of daily life disappears.



Hope this helps.

 

[uniquemand]

My own experiences with it:

As a pc I loved it. It was a wonderful introduction into Solo auditing, a gentle process that shifted a LOT of fixed masses and cleaned me up in a way that other auditing didn't.

I did only the straightforward "What am I dramatising", boiled it down to a word that read huge, found the exact opterm word and the pair would blow. Big F/N VGIs.

On people I have put through the upper levels - currently one is on R6 - I have used this same approach. Key to success in it is to make sure they are running deep and not just their latest PTPs. The question should cover fixed patterns that have existed for this entire lifetime, get the guy to write down his description of it - lots of itsa on it - and when that is fully done only then boil it down to a single word that reads BIG. He/she must have personal certainty and VGIs that he has the right word. Then the opposite will come easily and the pair will blow. That's it for that session.

I normally have them stay with me until I see they are auditing correcty and reliably and then I let thenm go home to complete the level. The following is from a recent session report from my current solo person after she had been here -

"Hi Leo - I sent Candy a big news-y letter and hopefully she will share that with you, but I also wanted to tell you (I've been meaning to for months...) that the first session I did when I came home was so great, so . . . perfect. the pair was (xxxxxx) and (yyyyyy), and it just described a major part of what I've been doing and running into for the last 3 lifetimes so exactly, that for weeks and weeks after, everytime I would remember it I was start smiling and feeling free and happy, and lightly think, oh, I need to tell Leo, and then I would float off and forget to write. I couldn't even be bothered to check if it was a persistently floating needle, but it sure did feel like it."

That's what the process should do. Lovely big key-outs and the massiness of daily life disappears.



Hope this helps.

Anyway, I think I will try again soon, but it was just so lovely - what a gigantic relief. I feel lighter even now, writing you about it, grinning.

I think Mary Freeman's Ethics Seminar takes a bite at this area, too. Very deep, very powerful, this was the sort of thing I could see why "auditing it was like living lightning", more than other types I've heard about, especially more than NED. NED, to me, is digging a ditch, a continuation of ARC S/W. It's developing the ability to confront what made you how you are, and rewriting your operating system, when it is done right. The problem is, during the rewriting of this operating system, we all become vulnerable to viruses, and that's what I consider the Implant levels and the focus on beings other than ourselves being responsible for our behavior. And when someone starts rewriting your O/S, you'd better hope they are benevolent.

 

[Lesolee (Sith Lord)]

My own experiences with it:

As a pc I loved it. It was a wonderful introduction into Solo auditing, a gentle process that shifted a LOT of fixed masses and cleaned me up in a way that other auditing didn't.

I did only the straightforward "What am I dramatising", boiled it down to a word that read huge, found the exact opterm word and the pair would blow. Big F/N VGIs.

On people I have put through the upper levels - currently one is on R6 - I have used this same approach. Key to success in it is to make sure they are running deep and not just their latest PTPs. The question should cover fixed patterns that have existed for this entire lifetime, get the guy to write down his description of it - lots of itsa on it - and when that is fully done only then boil it down to a single word that reads BIG. He/she must have personal certainty and VGIs that he has the right word. Then the opposite will come easily and the pair will blow. That's it for that session.
...
Hope this helps.

A very relevant and helpful posting. Much appreciated.

 

[Veda]

There should be a warning label on this stuff: "The Scientology 'Bridge' exploits the (usually therapeutic) process of abreaction."

 

[uniquemand]

And a disclaimer that if practiced knowledgeably by people who are aware of abreaction and transference, it can be beneficial, but not in the hands of psychopaths trained to take your money and disassociate you from your real needs and goals.

 

[Veda]

And a disclaimer that if practiced knowledgeably by people who are aware of abreaction and transference, it can be beneficial, but not in the hands of psychopaths trained to take your money and disassociate you from your real needs and goals.

To clarify, I was referring to the entire Commodore Hubbard-era/Emperor Xenu "Bridge," not just the sliver of the (old) "Bridge" known as Grade 6 "end words."

The earlier part of the "Bridge" (which included Grade 6) serves to "set up" the person for the "upper Bridge." The person has wins, has cathartic experiences, and develops trust for Scientology, and then is led into the "Implantology" portion of Scientology.

The so called "upper bridge" doesn't "work" on those who see the trap-aspect of it. It requires an unsuspecting person, able to use an e-meter, keep session records, etc. Then it can "work," and then it produces (with rare exception) a psychologically-hooked person who "does not know why." People can take years to recover from the experience. Some never do.

The over-all "Bridge to Xenu," IMO, doesn't require psychopaths to do harm; well-meaning individuals, who don't know any better, will suffice.

Subtract the trap-aspect from Scientology and it's not Scientology anymore.

Public Service Announcement for newbie lurkers:

http://forum.exscn.net/showpost.php?p=77478&postcount=14

 

[uniquemand]

BTW, the R6EW step, next to R3RA, is the best stuff in Scientology. I think it could use (and has received) a rewrite in English, without hype, of course, but I can't see how doing R6EW could hurt anyone, and I could see a tremendous amount of gain possible.

I don't use a meter, though, so I would do it meterless and track interest, rather than worrying about my paper-weight.

Here's a link for people who have No Fucking clue what is being discussed, here.

http://www.freezoneearth.org/Prometheus04/powerR6/r6ew/3howto_r6ew.htm