What's new
By:
Filters

Question re: PTS Type G

Pascal

Pascal

Silver Meritorious Patron
Alan said:
Enforced Standard ETHICS - TECH - and ADMIN makes for Standard BEINGS WITH NO VIEWPOINTS OF THEIR OWN​

I omitted the first word out. "Enforced"

Could not correct it as my error allowance was gone :)



The original intent of the Grade Chart was to key-out GPMs.

Here is excerpt from:

HCO BULLETIN OF 29 JUNE 1964
CENTRAL ORG AND FIELD AUDITOR TARGETS​

Now fortunately for the org and field auditor there is a vital preparation necessary for Level VI. It is a real, true technical preparation.

EVEN WHEN YOU ARE DELIVERING R6 TO THE PUBLIC ROUTINELY YOU WILL BE RUNNING PCs ON THIS FIRST FOR HUNDREDS AND HUNDREDS OF HOURS.

You had better learn to profit by it.

The preparation is this:

Those preclears who are insufficiently Cause in their daily lives cannot as-is the bank. You could throw them in to GPMs but nothing would happen to the GPMs—only to the pc.

We have a true tiger by the tail. Take Man X off Times Square, pitch him into
GPMs and he wouldn’t go OT, he’d go rheumatic. Why? He can’t as-is the significances and masses.

This will be found exclamatorily true of some 99 percent of the pcs.

Auditors are different. They can confront more. But nine out of twenty-five
auditors break a leg over commas in GPMs when they are pc-ing. One sneeze and the meter locks up. One error in sequence and it’s a ten auditing hour battle to find and get the charge off that error.

In carefully studying this I found there were pcs Type A and Type B. Type A runs easily even across errors. Type B packs up the meter on a cough.

NINETY-NINE PERCENT OF YOUR PRECLEARS ARE OR WERE ORIGINALLY TYPE B.

There are special differences in these two types.

Type A: Has few personal problems. Even when they occur isn’t upset by them.
Handles life easily. Is energetic generally and able to work efficiently at things. Takes setbacks optimistically. Feels good most of the time.

Type B: Is deluged with personal problems. Can’t see any way out. Gets upset
easily or is just in plain apathy and is never upset because things aren’t real anyway (like a boulder wouldn’t get upset). Has a hard time in life. Is generally tired and can’t work very long at anything. Takes setbacks emotionally or just collapses. Feels ill most of the time.

Those are two types of people. There are of course shades of grey in between.

If you were to take a Type B and throw him or her to the GPMs you’d not get anything as-ised.

What is the basic difference, then, between these two types of condition?

It isn’t native or inherent. It can change.

If you tire a Type A out you can make him or her behave on GPMs like a Type B.

If you audit a Type A with the Auditor’s Code clauses of food and rest wildly disobeyed, you would be auditing, suddenly, a Type B pc.

The Type A will spring back faster of course but still he or she during that period will have a packed up meter.

You could also inexpertly audit a Type A on wrong goals or sequences and get a Type B pc reaction.

A Type B can’t be Cause!

Life flows in, in, in. The pc can’t flow out. Here is the pc who can only receive auditing. Never give any. Here is the pc who has to be HELPED but never really helps.

Here is the pc who has motivators but never any overts.

Now, you see?

It takes those lower grades to raise the pc’s Cause Level so that the pc, on reaching Grade VI can as-is the bank. ONLY CAREFUL LOWER LEVEL AUDITING CAN MAKE A TYPE B PC INTO A TYPE A!

So they are here for quite a while and all that time we now work on raising their Cause Level so they can:

1. Use what they learn (that takes outflow)

2. As-is their PTPs (that takes the ability to be Cause)

3. Get up to Level VI materials without fainting at the sight of them and

4. As-is GPMs.

The state of high Cause is also Keyed Out Clear.





Enforced Standard Tech on an improperly set-up low cause level person is the problem!!

And the set-up Tech was omitted around 1965.

Alan
Click to expand...

Good post!

True the COS has lost it's soul. Admin and head on pikes prime over tech. You have noone training on Class VII, a grad V audits NOTS, No new XIIs are made. A disgrace. On a planet populated by galactic scum it's quite stupid to act like DM does with people in the COS. He must be somewhere on the back track, he's no in PT for sure.
 
Pascal

Pascal

Silver Meritorious Patron
Emma said:
I have a PTS type H declare that I'm quite proud of! :happydance:
Click to expand...

Which one is that? I had a type J once from a stupid EO in Montreal. But RTC revoked it. I guess it was before DM kicked everyone out. The last time I asked RTC to redress some injustice they ignored me. Wrong move DM.
 
Emma

Emma

Con te partirò
Administrator
Here you go, take a look!

PTSTypeHdeclarealtered.jpg
 
Alanzo

Alanzo

Bardo Tulpa
Wow, Emma!!!

I'm jealous!!!

You're so open-minded. You expressed doubts about LRH - HOW DARE YOU!!!!

Just shows what a delicate house of cards the Church of Scientology is when someone expresses doubts they kick them out! Even if they are a decorated auditor who has made tons of money for them in the past.

I've never had any kind of goldenrod written on me. I confirmed the other day that all the Scientologists in my area have been verbally told to disconnect from me but no one has been shown anything in writing.

I want my declare!!! :hurt:
 
Emma

Emma

Con te partirò
Administrator
Vinaire said:
Why is it CC to BLACKBURN ASSOCIATES?

.
Click to expand...

They are a field group who were trying to reg my then husband for $20k to go to the AO. I'd answer the phone and we'd all get into trouble because they weren't allowed to talk to me and I wasn't allowed to talk to them.
 
Vinaire

Vinaire

Sponsor
Emma said:
They are a field group who were trying to reg my then husband for $20k to go to the AO. I'd answer the phone and we'd all get into trouble because they weren't allowed to talk to me and I wasn't allowed to talk to them.
Click to expand...

How childish!

.
 
Pascal

Pascal

Silver Meritorious Patron
Emma said:
Here you go, take a look!

PTSTypeHdeclarealtered.jpg
Click to expand...

So noone took the effort to get you case gain and now you are blamed for a condition that noone would want to have willingly. Gorgeous. The COS is at Glee of irresponsability level. What is the "handling" for Type H?
 
Z

Zinjifar

Silver Meritorious Sponsor
Ralph Hilton said:
Emma!
Didn't you see the copyright notice? You aren't allowed to post your own Ethics Orders! Now you'll probably have "Copyright Terrorist" added to your list of high crimes :naughty: :)
Click to expand...

She commented on it, and, even better, she deleted her last name, so, it's obviously Fair Use.

Had she used her own full name, the 'Church' could have claimed copyright maybe :)

Zinj
 
Emma

Emma

Con te partirò
Administrator
I'm not using their symbols for my own purposes.

It's a piece of correspondance to me from the CoS.

I'm not profitting from it or using it for my own purposes so how can it be copyright violation?

I'm not suggesting you are wrong, but I just don't get it.
 
Z

Zinjifar

Silver Meritorious Sponsor
Emma said:
I'm not using their symbols for my own purposes.

It's a piece of correspondance to me from the CoS.

I'm not profitting from it or using it for my own purposes so how can it be copyright violation?

I'm not suggesting you are wrong, but I just don't get it.
Click to expand...

The point is that, while it's obviously not a copyright violation (which may or may not depend on the 'use' it's put to) the 'Church' can *claim* copyright violations for anything.

They even claimed copyright for a faked NOTs level Keith Henson wrote.

It's not about validity; only harassment and the power of money.

Zinj
 
Emma

Emma

Con te partirò
Administrator
If I posted long sections from a church publication I'd be worried. But this is personal correspondance given to me by them.

Tough.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top