What's new

The Little Thread Which Grew - the Apollo '73 to Everything But

Status
Not open for further replies.

Ted

Gold Meritorious Patron
Pain and Sex

There seems to be some mystery about this HCOB for some people. They try to figure-figure on the ultimate meaning. Is sex based on implants, whole track skullduggery, etc.?

This is the bottom line. You need to wonder no further:

Hubbard wanted to be the ultimate sperm source. When he could no longer get it up to play the game, he definitely didn't want you in there playing either. The Pain and Sex HCOB is late track lunacy direct from the master lunatic. That's all there is to it.

The direct correlation between the tone scale and the know to mystery scale is equally bullshit. There's a BC lecture on the K to M Scale. In it Hubbard says that every level of the K to M Scale has in itself another K to M Scale. So, was he lying then, or was he lying later?

Both graphs were placed on one piece of paper to save printing costs. Or for some control bullshit. People who are hung up on sex use it as a ser fac they push into your universe to imply that you are really low toned for having sex--and enjoying it!

Just play safe. Wrap it before you pack it in strange places.

Now it's up to you to determine how serious I really am. :coolwink:
 

Ted

Gold Meritorious Patron
You may be right. If you look real close, you can see a knee pad on the lady's left knee.
Lakey


At first glance I thought the lady was placing the tray on the bed. Then I thought, "I wonder what she looks like with her robe removed?" Pretty hot, I think, in a '50s/'60s style.

Then I realized that she is not placing the tray on the bed. She is taking it off!

How stupid could I have been. Of course. That's it! :duh:
 
Doris Day - Happy Birthday To Doris Day


Doris_Day-r1544.JPG


Doris Day - Screen legend and animal rights activist Doris Day celebrates her birthday today! Doris' birthdate ranges anywhere from 1922-1924 putting her current age between 87-89 years old.

Doris Day enjoyed a long and successful career in Hollywood. Day began her entertainment career in 1945 as a big band singer.

In 1945 she had her first hit recording, Sentimental Journey. In 1948, she appeared in her first film, Romance on the High Seas.
During her entertainment career, she appeared in 39 films, recorded more than 650 songs, received an Academy Award nomination, won a Golden Globe and a Grammy Award, and, in 1989, received the Cecil B. DeMille Award for lifetime achievement in motion pictures.

As of 2009, Day was the top-ranking female box office star of all time and ranked sixth among the top ten box office performers (male and female).

Happy Birthday Doris Day!
 

Ted

Gold Meritorious Patron
Several BJs would be warranted if trying to persuade someone to wear that tie.


Mark A. Baker


Depends. A guy's choice of ties is not the best choice when there is another option.

If you want a good choice for a tie, have your lady friend pick one out. The ladies make the best choices, and you will get the most compliments on those ties.
 

Terril park

Sponsor
The direct correlation between the tone scale and the know to mystery scale is equally bullshit. There's a BC lecture on the K to M Scale. In it Hubbard says that every level of the K to M Scale has in itself another K to M Scale. So, was he lying then, or was he lying later?

Please elucidate., Can't follow you here.
 
Depends. A guy's choice of ties is not the best choice when there is another option.

If you want a good choice for a tie, have your lady friend pick one out. The ladies make the best choices, and you will get the most compliments on those ties.

I am of the school that believes that there is no such thing as a 'good' tie, merely aesthetically pleasing ones versus those lacking aesthetic value in addition to being devoid of value as an item of clothing.

And FWIW, I've gay friends who do a much better job of advising on matters of apparel & style than any of the women I know. Women dress men as if to mark them as taken. Personally though I'm definitely a jeans & tees kind of guy.


Mark A. Baker
 

Ted

Gold Meritorious Patron
I am of the school that believes that there is no such thing as a 'good' tie, merely aesthetically pleasing ones versus those lacking aesthetic value in addition to being devoid of value as an item of clothing.

And FWIW, I've gay friends who do a much better job of advising on matters of apparel & style than any of the women I know. Women dress men as if to mark them as taken. Personally though I'm definitely a jeans & tees kind of guy.


Mark A. Baker


Learn to work the system, Mark. Work the system. :coolwink:
 

Auditor's Toad

Clear as Mud
If I plan on going out of the house the boss gets in on my clothes selection.

" You might want to rethink that shirt ( or whatever ) " got said too often.

Tie ? Wedding. Funeral. Yes.

Otherwise : oh hell no !
 

FoTi

Crusader
Doris Day - Happy Birthday To Doris Day


Doris_Day-r1544.JPG


Doris Day - Screen legend and animal rights activist Doris Day celebrates her birthday today! Doris' birthdate ranges anywhere from 1922-1924 putting her current age between 87-89 years old.

Doris Day enjoyed a long and successful career in Hollywood. Day began her entertainment career in 1945 as a big band singer.

In 1945 she had her first hit recording, Sentimental Journey. In 1948, she appeared in her first film, Romance on the High Seas.
During her entertainment career, she appeared in 39 films, recorded more than 650 songs, received an Academy Award nomination, won a Golden Globe and a Grammy Award, and, in 1989, received the Cecil B. DeMille Award for lifetime achievement in motion pictures.

As of 2009, Day was the top-ranking female box office star of all time and ranked sixth among the top ten box office performers (male and female).

Happy Birthday Doris Day!

What a nice way to go through life.
 

Leon

Gold Meritorious Patron
The direct correlation between the tone scale and the know to mystery scale is equally bullshit. There's a BC lecture on the K to M Scale. In it Hubbard says that every level of the K to M Scale has in itself another K to M Scale. So, was he lying then, or was he lying later?


Neither. In the Tone Scale too, every tone has within it a scale of all the other tones, and each of them has the same scale within. Ditto - and perhaps especially so - with the Awareness levels.

These things are fractals and each contains the whole within it. The basic fractal underlying all others is Be - Do- Have.
 

lkwdblds

Crusader
Fractals, I like this data Leon!

Neither. In the Tone Scale too, every tone has within it a scale of all the other tones, and each of them has the same scale within. Ditto - and perhaps especially so - with the Awareness levels.

These things are fractals and each contains the whole within it. The basic fractal underlying all others is Be - Do- Have.

Very nice, Leon! Bob Harvey once a big wheel in Scn Management came out to ASHO in late 1971 to get the Establishment Officer System going in the PAC ORGs. I was sent by Celebrity Centre to be their Div 3 attendee.

Bob Harvey spent time with us going over the Org board and particularly the Awareness Characteristics along the bottom of the board. Each department within a division had its own awareness characteristic. For my Department 8 it was "Adjustment", for the Department 7, the Income division, it was "Energy". Departman 9, the third department in treasury, RAM, had "body" as its characteristic. RAM stood for Records, Assets and Materials.

This made sense to me, Income had the awareness characteristic of energy, My department banked the money and wrote the checks to buy things and that corresponded to adjustment. RAM dealt with records, assets and materials which corresponded to "body"

We were not taught the word "fractals" but Bob explained the fractal nature of the Org Board. Every division, every department, every section had a thetan over it and 3 departments corresponding to mind, body and product. Ditto with each division having a be, do, and have component. .

I thought the whole thing was brilliant. We had about 4 meetings and then Bob Harvey got busted. I never found out why until just recently. He was the nicest senior exec of them all and seemed to really know his stuff. Not too long ago, I read on ESMB that he was busted for running a crush reg cycle on Elvis Presley. He got Elvis pissed off by pushing too hard for a large package deal. Elvis must have been ripe for the picking because shortly after he died, Pricilla and Lisa Marie joined Scientology.

The bottom line, fractals seem to play a large role in the way this universe is put together.
Lakey
 

I told you I was trouble

Suspended animation
Nothing personal, I just can't get over how much that Bad Seed girl resembles your Avatar. I did compliment you for communicating in a direct manner. Look at the bright side of my post, it was only made to be playful.

If you don't see it that way, then I deserve your rebuke. No problem.
Lakey


Cool, Lakey.



Roger, I have linked to the post you were possibly referring to re someone (you as it happens) screwing with someone else's post and the result thereof.

http://www.forum.exscn.net/showpost.php?p=555367&postcount=157




Originally Posted by RogerB

Sweetness,

My little post wasn't directed at you particularly, and certainly no reproof.

It was written simply because of recent traffic on ESMB, it so happens that the you and Face thing has been a recent example. I too have been a "target" of this kind of misquoting and misduplication (deliberate, I believe, in order to stir trouble) . . . so I wrote as a missive that might help others understand what goes on and how they can be affected by others screwing with their posts.

The firefights that break out on forums very often begin simply as a running out of control of this kind of misrepresenting of what people actually write.

We had an example on this thread in the last few days wherein what I wrote was misrepresented in order to do a destructive attack on me . . . . it was on the issue of my first colliding with the "victim-hood serfac" in Aden in 1965.

Rog

I also linked (below) to the other posts you mention where I misrepresented you in order to do a destructive attack on you ...

I re-looked at the post and I can see where I went wrong, I was way too soft.

How anyone could coldly observe lepers as a knife wielding surgeon would view a fully exposed patient on the operating table is quite beyond me and to refer to it decades later as an example of the victim-hood game of a ser fac further astounds me.

http://www.forum.exscn.net/showpost.php?p=556487&postcount=11570

Sorry if I missed your main point about ser facs and victims on ESMB but I was too stunned to care especially as mentioning ser facs is yet another tool that a scientologist uses to shut people up or attempt to introvert them.

You may as well accept that you have got little to no chance of controlling me or many others that post here and just concentrate on your brood of followers, preferably away from ESMB where people are lurking and newly out and need space to dump all the cultic nonsense that you so love to push, having flown from the ruthless trap that is scientology and landing here, presumably looking for assistance and support. You are not assisting them to get out of the trap by lecturing about ser facs and victims in a sneering and derogatory fashion.

Why do you do that?
 

FoTi

Crusader
Cool, Lakey.



Roger, I have linked to the post you were possibly referring to re someone (you as it happens) screwing with someone else's post and the result thereof.

http://www.forum.exscn.net/showpost.php?p=555367&postcount=157






I also linked (below) to the other posts you mention where I misrepresented you in order to do a destructive attack on you ...

I re-looked at the post and I can see where I went wrong, I was way too soft.

How anyone could coldly observe lepers as a knife wielding surgeon would view a fully exposed patient on the operating table is quite beyond me and to refer to it decades later as an example of the victim-hood game of a ser fac further astounds me.

http://www.forum.exscn.net/showpost.php?p=556487&postcount=11570

Sorry if I missed your main point about ser facs and victims on ESMB but I was too stunned to care especially as mentioning ser facs is yet another tool that a scientologist uses to shut people up or attempt to introvert them.

You may as well accept that you have got little to no chance of controlling me or many others that post here and just concentrate on your brood of followers, preferably away from ESMB where people are lurking and newly out and need space to dump all the cultic nonsense that you so love to push, having flown from the ruthless trap that is scientology and landing here, presumably looking for assistance and support. You are not assisting them to get out of the trap by lecturing about ser facs and victims in a sneering and derogatory fashion.

Why do you do that?

Wow! You're really pissed, aren't you? Did Roger push your buttons?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top