What's new

The Little Thread Which Grew - the Apollo '73 to Everything But

Status
Not open for further replies.
New Year's Eve

It's hard to ring in the New Year if the clappers are stolen from the bells.

[video=youtube;c-teZKQNOF0]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c-teZKQNOF0[/video]
 
ring in the new year

A Swedish woman who lost her wedding ring 16 years ago was flabbergasted when she found it again, around a carrot growing in her garden, media reported Saturday.

Lena Paahlsson had taken off the white gold ring before a Christmas baking session with her daughters in 1995, but it had disappeared from the kitchen counter where she placed it.

After looking everywhere, and even pulling up floorboards in the search, Paahlsson and her family, who live on a farm in northern Sweden, had given up on seeing the ring again, she told the Dagens Nyheter daily.

That was until October this year, when she was picking the last carrots in her garden and suddenly found one with her ring glimmering around it.

The family thinks the ring must have fallen into the sink back in 1995 and been mixed with potato peels that were composted or fed to the sheep, since all the soil in the garden comes from composted vegetables and sheep dung.

The ring no longer fits Paahlsson, but she told Dagens Nyheter she plans to have it enlarged.

"I had given up hope. Now that I have found the ring again ... I want to be able to use it," she said.
 
Creativity

Hubbard would have had you believe that everything you come up with in session is off your time track, that every idea has been thought by someone else before, and that he was the original originator. I went Clear, a phrase we used to say, early in my Dianetic auditing. I realized that no auditor was going to run my time track while I sat by watching the "movie." No. I mocked it up. I answered the auditing commands/questions. I mocked it up. I was running a creative process. Then I observed that every person that I audited was mocking it up. All their woes and joys were mocked up.

Hubbard's disservice was to state or imply that present time mockups were recalls or returns to events of the past. But I never audited anyone who disappeared physically into a past incident to return and give me the answers to an auditing question.

This article from Creativity.com is very informative and refreshing.

Twelve Things You Were Not Taught in School About Creative Thinking

By Michael Michalko | Dec 06, 2011


Synopsis
Aspects of creative thinking that are not usually taught.

1. You are creative. The artist is not a special person, each one of us is a special kind of artist. Every one of us is born a creative, spontaneous thinker. The only difference between people who are creative and people who are not is a simple belief. Creative people believe they are creative. People who believe they are not creative, are not. Once you have a particular identity and set of beliefs about yourself, you become interested in seeking out the skills needed to express your identity and beliefs. This is why people who believe they are creative become creative. If you believe you are not creative, then there is no need to learn how to become creative and you don't. The reality is that believing you are not creative excuses you from trying or attempting anything new. When someone tells you that they are not creative, you are talking to someone who has no interest and will make no effort to be a creative thinker.

2. Creative thinking is work. You must have passion and the determination to immerse yourself in the process of creating new and different ideas. Then you must have patience to persevere against all adversity. All creative geniuses work passionately hard and produce incredible numbers of ideas, most of which are bad. In fact, more bad poems were written by the major poets than by minor poets. Thomas Edison created 3000 different ideas for lighting systems before he evaluated them for practicality and profitability. Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart produced more than six hundred pieces of music, including forty-one symphonies and some forty-odd operas and masses, during his short creative life. Rembrandt produced around 650 paintings and 2,000 drawings and Picasso executed more than 20,000 works. Shakespeare wrote 154 sonnets. Some were masterpieces, while others were no better than his contemporaries could have written, and some were simply bad.

3. You must go through the motions of being creative. When you are producing ideas, you are replenishing neurotransmitters linked to genes that are being turned on and off in response to what your brain is doing, which in turn is responding to challenges. When you go through the motions of trying to come up with new ideas, you are energizing your brain by increasing the number of contacts between neurons. The more times you try to get ideas, the more active your brain becomes and the more creative you become. If you want to become an artist and all you did was paint a picture every day, you will become an artist. You may not become another Vincent Van Gogh, but you will become more of an artist than someone who has never tried.

4. Your brain is not a computer. Your brain is a dynamic system that evolves its patterns of activity rather than computes them like a computer. It thrives on the creative energy of feedback from experiences real or fictional. You can synthesize experience; literally create it in your own imagination. The human brain cannot tell the difference between an "actual" experience and an experience imagined vividly and in detail. This discovery is what enabled Albert Einstein to create his thought experiments with imaginary scenarios that led to his revolutionary ideas about space and time. One day, for example, he imagined falling in love. Then he imagined meeting the woman he fell in love with two weeks after he fell in love. This led to his theory of acausality. The same process of synthesizing experience allowed Walt Disney to bring his fantasies to life.

5. There is no one right answer. Reality is ambiguous. Aristotle said it is either A or not-A. It cannot be both. The sky is either blue or not blue. This is black and white thinking as the sky is a billion different shades of blue. A beam of light is either a wave or not a wave (A or not-A). Physicists discovered that light can be either a wave or particle depending on the viewpoint of the observer. The only certainty in life is uncertainty. When trying to get ideas, do not censor or evaluate them as they occur. Nothing kills creativity faster than self-censorship of ideas while generating them. Think of all your ideas as possibilities and generate as many as you can before you decide which ones to select. The world is not black or white. It is grey.

6. Never stop with your first good idea. Always strive to find a better one and continue until you have one that is still better. In 1862, Phillip Reis demonstrated his invention which could transmit music over the wires. He was days away from improving it into a telephone that could transmit speech. Every communication expert in Germany dissuaded him from making improvements, as they said the telegraph is good enough. No one would buy or use a telephone. Ten years later, Alexander Graham Bell patented the telephone. Spencer Silver developed a new adhesive for 3M that stuck to objects but could easily be lifted off. It was first marketed as a bulletin board adhesive so the boards could be moved easily from place to place. There was no market for it. Silver didn't discard it. One day Arthur Fry, another 3M employee, was singing in the church's choir when his page marker fell out of his hymnal. Fry coated his page markers with Silver's adhesive and discovered the markers stayed in place, yet lifted off without damaging the page. Hence the Post-it Notes were born. Thomas Edison was always trying to spring board from one idea to another in his work. He spring boarded his work from the telephone (sounds transmitted) to the phonograph (sounds recorded) and, finally, to motion pictures (images recorded).

7. Expect the experts to be negative. The more expert and specialized a person becomes, the more their mindset becomes narrowed and the more fixated they become on confirming what they believe to be absolute. Consequently, when confronted with new and different ideas, their focus will be on conformity. Does it conform with what I know is right? If not, experts will spend all their time showing and explaining why it can't be done and why it can't work. They will not look for ways to make it work or get it done because this might demonstrate that what they regarded as absolute is not absolute at all. This is why when Fred Smith created Federal Express, every delivery expert in the U.S. predicted its certain doom. After all, they said, if this delivery concept was doable, the Post Office or UPS would have done it long ago.

8. Trust your instincts. Don't allow yourself to get discouraged. Albert Einstein was expelled from school because his attitude had a negative effect on serious students; he failed his university entrance exam and had to attend a trade school for one year before finally being admitted; and was the only one in his graduating class who did not get a teaching position because no professor would recommend him. One professor said Einstein was "the laziest dog" the university ever had. Beethoven's parents were told he was too stupid to be a music composer. Charles Darwin's colleagues called him a fool and what he was doing "fool's experiments" when he worked on his theory of biological evolution. Walt Disney was fired from his first job on a newspaper because "he lacked imagination." Thomas Edison had only two years of formal schooling, was totally deaf in one ear and was hard of hearing in the other, was fired from his first job as a newsboy and later fired from his job as a telegrapher; and still he became the most famous inventor in the history of the U.S.

9. There is no such thing as failure. Whenever you try to do something and do not succeed, you do not fail. You have learned something that does not work. Always ask "What have I learned about what doesn't work?", "Can this explain something that I didn't set out to explain?", and "What have I discovered that I didn't set out to discover?" Whenever someone tells you that they have never made a mistake, you are talking to someone who has never tried anything new.

10. You do not see things as they are; you see them as you are. Interpret your own experiences. All experiences are neutral. They have no meaning. You give them meaning by the way you choose to interpret them. If you are a priest, you see evidence of God everywhere. If you are an atheist, you see the absence of God everywhere. IBM observed that no one in the world had a personal computer. IBM interpreted this to mean there was no market. College dropouts, Bill Gates and Steve Jobs, looked at the same absence of personal computers and saw a massive opportunity. Once Thomas Edison was approached by an assistant while working on the filament for the light bulb. The assistant asked Edison why he didn't give up. "After all," he said, "you have failed 5000 times." Edison looked at him and told him that he didn't understand what the assistant meant by failure, because, Edison said, "I have discovered 5000 things that don't work." You construct your own reality by how you choose to interpret your experiences.

11. Always approach a problem on its own terms. Do not trust your first perspective of a problem as it will be too biased toward your usual way of thinking. Always look at your problem from multiple perspectives. Always remember that genius is finding a perspective no one else has taken. Look for different ways to look at the problem. Write the problem statement several times using different words. Take another role, for example, how would someone else see it, how would Jay Leno, Pablo Picasso, George Patton see it? Draw a picture of the problem, make a model, or mold a sculpture. Take a walk and look for things that metaphorically represent the problem and force connections between those things and the problem (How is a broken store window like my communications problem with my students?) Ask your friends and strangers how they see the problem. Ask a child. How would a ten year old solve it? Ask a grandparent. Imagine you are the problem. When you change the way you look at things, the things you look at change.

12. Learn to think unconventionally. Creative geniuses do not think analytically and logically. Conventional, logical, analytical thinkers are exclusive thinkers which means they exclude all information that is not related to the problem. They look for ways to eliminate possibilities. Creative geniuses are inclusive thinkers which mean they look for ways to include everything, including things that are dissimilar and totally unrelated. Generating associations and connections between unrelated or dissimilar subjects is how they provoke different thinking patterns in their brain. These new patterns lead to new connections which give them a different way to focus on the information and different ways to interpret what they are focusing on. This is how original and truly novel ideas are created. Albert Einstein once famously remarked "Imagination is more important than knowledge. For knowledge is limited to all we now know and understand, while imagination embraces the entire world, and all there ever will be to know and understand."


And, finally, Creativity is paradoxical. To create, a person must have knowledge but forget the knowledge, must see unexpected connections in things but not have a mental disorder, must work hard but spend time doing nothing as information incubates, must create many ideas yet most of them are useless, must look at the same thing as everyone else, yet see something different, must desire success but embrace failure, must be persistent but not stubborn, and must listen to experts but know how to disregard them.
 
Re: The old days - Aboard the Apollo - 1973

Ira Chaleff and I **think** his first wife, Candy. She's still around. Sally is long dead (cancer). I don't know anything about Ira.

Ira was married to Sheila. They are not together any more, but very, very sad to tell you that Skye killed himself in 2010 I believe.
 
What would Ron do?

In the late 1960s, as Scientologists were entering England, from abroad, to go to St. Hill, they were turned away if they were carrying e meters or Scientology materials.

Ron mobilized forces, and quickly created ASHO, among other things.

Something the GO did was hand travelers to the UK Scientology materials prior to their boarding planes to Heathrow. When the travelers disembarked, nasty customs personnel caused them angst. This, in turn, caused the government angst.

It's sometimes hard to tell a player when they are all wearing the same jersey.

Skip to present day, 2012.

I think that loyal Scientologists should put a bumper sticker on their car that says: "KSW" to show their loyalty.

Furthermore, I think that Independant Scientologists should put a bumper sticker on their car that says: "KSW" to show their support of M & M's cause.

And I think that Freezone Scientologists should put a bumper sticker on their car that says: "KSW" to show their ability to stand up for their integrity.

Of course, Debbie Cook's friends should support her courageous stand with
a bumper sticker on their car that says: "KSW" to show their support of Keeping Scientology Working.

A thousand bumper stickers costs $300.

Having the Co$ chasing their tale might be a funny sight.

Keeping in mind The Art of War and the Fair Game Policy:

What would Ron do?
 
Re: What would Ron do?

In the late 1960s, as Scientologists were entering England, from abroad, to go to St. Hill, they were turned away if they were carrying e meters or Scientology materials.

Ron mobilized forces, and quickly created ASHO, among other things.

Something the GO did was hand travelers to the UK Scientology materials prior to their boarding planes to Heathrow. When the travelers disembarked, nasty customs personnel caused them angst. This, in turn, caused the government angst.

It's sometimes hard to tell a player when they are all wearing the same jersey.

Skip to present day, 2012.

I think that loyal Scientologists should put a bumper sticker on their car that says: "KSW" to show their loyalty.

Furthermore, I think that Independant Scientologists should put a bumper sticker on their car that says: "KSW" to show their support of M & M's cause.

And I think that Freezone Scientologists should put a bumper sticker on their car that says: "KSW" to show their ability to stand up for their integrity.

Of course, Debbie Cook's friends should support her courageous stand with
a bumper sticker on their car that says: "KSW" to show their support of Keeping Scientology Working.

A thousand bumper stickers costs $300.

Having the Co$ chasing their tale might be a funny sight.

Keeping in mind The Art of War and the Fair Game Policy:

What would Ron do?

Maybe the same thing he already did?

Drop it and get the hell out of all this mess.....only he forgot to take his $ with him when he went. :biggrin:

Or....maybe he did come back and he's now using DM as a front.....still trying to get all the money he can out of it before the whole thing collapses......then they can split the proceeds.....that is if both of them survive. :eyeroll: :unsure:
 
cool story

[video]http://gma.yahoo.com/video/news-26797925/oklahoma-mother-18-kills-intruder-breaking-into-her-home-while-on-phone-with-911-27777235.html[/video]
 
Psychopathic Domination

In Scientology, out of Scientology, this is the problem we face: :omg::omg::omg: From article, this explains--for those needing explanation--as to why/how the honest person can get nailed on a security check while the pathologically inclined skate on through. Emphasis below is mine:

http://www.whale.to/b/callahan1.html

When you understand the true nature of psychopathic influence, that it is conscienceless, emotionless, selfish, cold and calculating, and devoid of any moral or ethical standards, you are horrified, but at the same time everything suddenly begins to makes sense. Our society is ever more soulless because the people who lead it and who set the example are soulless – they literally have no conscience.

In his book Political Oenology, Andrej Lobaczewski explains that clinical psychopaths enjoy advantages even in non-violent competitions to climb the ranks of social hierarchies. Because they can lie without remorse (and without the telltale physiological stress that is measured by lie detector tests), psychopaths can always say whatever is necessary to get what they want. In court, for example, psychopaths can tell extreme bald-faced lies in a plausible manner, while their sane opponents are handicapped by an emotional predisposition to remain within hailing distance of the truth. Too often, the judge or jury imagines that the truth must be somewhere in the middle, and then issues decisions that benefit the psychopath. As with judges and juries, so too with those charged with decisions concerning who to promote and who not to promote in corporate, military and governmental hierarchies. The result is that all hierarchies inevitably become top-heavy with psychopaths. Since psychopaths have no limitations on what they can or will do to get to the top, the ones in charge are generally pathological. It is not power that corrupts, it is that corrupt individuals seek power.​
 
Re: The old days - Aboard the Apollo - 1973

Ted wrote:
Snipped . . .
The result is that all hierarchies inevitably become top-heavy with psychopaths. Since psychopaths have no limitations on what they can or will do to get to the top, the ones in charge are generally pathological. It is not power that corrupts, it is that corrupt individuals seek power.

Yes. It is very true. And there are a number of "driving" factors involved, not the least of which is the insanity of compulsive domination over others.

In the corporate world, the tragedy is that most decent people, not being aware of or understanding what's going on tend to back off in the presence of the covert destructive "bad vibes" and other feelings of discomfort in the presence of the psychopath. And this leaves the psychopath standing to dominate.

Most folk, unfortunately, do not know what "should be" on the subject of optimum relationships, and so lose out to the actions of the psychopath.

PS: thanks for the granddaughter pics . . . she is a real charmer!

R
 
Re: The old days - Aboard the Apollo - 1973

ther are some great names on that list! Mickey Lipton was in FLAG when I arrived for my EPF. Due to the fact that I was only 14 my Guardien was Mickey. My father just signed me over to the church without even knowing who would care for me. She was such a nice person and I was bleesed to have such a loving and caring woman care for me. She never really did much other then ask how I was from time to time, but that was enough. I was very sad when she routed out of the SO. I was in CMO CW at the time and was very ARC broken.

I hope that she is well.....:unsure:

She is. :yes:

I also knew Mickey Lipton, way back in 1977. What a wonderful woman! She got married then. I was friends with her husband (they've long since been divorced, no children) and made contact with him again recently. He hasn't seen or spoken to her in a couple of years but he said she was fine - I believe he said she was remarried with children. I'll double check with him, I think he still has a way of contacting her.

Sorry I can't give you the name of Mickey's ex or any other details. He hasn't come out publicly yet and has a bit of a paranoid streak about Scn due to some bad past experiences with the GO/OSA, so he doesn't write me regularly, either. Mickey is fine though. :)

Sheila
 
Re: The old days - Aboard the Apollo - 1973

In the vein of our Ted's submissions of interesting and useful thought, here is a video I came across today.

It's one the subject of kids learning and some views on helping them do so.

[video=youtube;ebJHzpEy4bE]http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=ebJHzpEy4bE#![/video]
 
Re: Psychopathic Domination

In Scientology, out of Scientology, this is the problem we face: :omg::omg::omg: From article, this explains--for those needing explanation--as to why/how the honest person can get nailed on a security check while the pathologically inclined skate on through. Emphasis below is mine:

http://www.whale.to/b/callahan1.html

When you understand the true nature of psychopathic influence, that it is conscienceless, emotionless, selfish, cold and calculating, and devoid of any moral or ethical standards, you are horrified, but at the same time everything suddenly begins to makes sense. Our society is ever more soulless because the people who lead it and who set the example are soulless – they literally have no conscience.

In his book Political Oenology, Andrej Lobaczewski explains that clinical psychopaths enjoy advantages even in non-violent competitions to climb the ranks of social hierarchies. Because they can lie without remorse (and without the telltale physiological stress that is measured by lie detector tests), psychopaths can always say whatever is necessary to get what they want. In court, for example, psychopaths can tell extreme bald-faced lies in a plausible manner, while their sane opponents are handicapped by an emotional predisposition to remain within hailing distance of the truth. Too often, the judge or jury imagines that the truth must be somewhere in the middle, and then issues decisions that benefit the psychopath. As with judges and juries, so too with those charged with decisions concerning who to promote and who not to promote in corporate, military and governmental hierarchies. The result is that all hierarchies inevitably become top-heavy with psychopaths. Since psychopaths have no limitations on what they can or will do to get to the top, the ones in charge are generally pathological. It is not power that corrupts, it is that corrupt individuals seek power.​

This really hits home Ted! I was even able to apply it to my original theme when starting this thread, i.e., The Old Days Aboard the Apollo!

Imagine a garden variety type of person who still has some soul left and buys into Hubbard and Scientology hook, line and sinker. After about 3 years of studying Hubbard and doing services, the person shows up on the Flag Ship Apollo. The person is indoctrinated into believing that Hubbard is the wisest being in the Universe and that only his most loyal and elite followers are on the ship with him and are serving him in both running the ship and running world wide Scientology.

What one finds upon arriving on the ship is that most of the higher ranking personel are psychotics and they have been conditioned to the point where they are totally souless. Many of them seem to actually love intimidating their juniors, humiliating them, punishing them, destroying their lives. They act very self important, as if they are really "big shots". They put up a front that they have much more important things to do but now they have to use their valuable time to clean up their incompetent junior. They blame their hapless junior for derailing them from their true duties. The juniors are made to feel degraded and incompetent.

Some people who were on the Apollo in 1973 who, in my opinion, fit this description perfectly were Sandy Wilhere (RIP), Maria Starkey and Sue Anderson. The guy who picked people up from the airport was another psycho but I don't know his name.

The leadership ranks were full of psychotics weilding power though by no means were all the leaders psychotic. Ken Urquhart had a very high post and remained a very caring and sane person, just as an example. I did not know Faceinthecrowd, but obviously, he has a lot of soul as well.

For a new person arriving there and being relatively inexperienced, living day to day while being led by psychotics is exceedingly harmful to one's feeling good about themselves. The newer person can't compute that all these psychotics have leadership on the ship. The computation is that Hubbard is here on the ship and he is always right. These leaders who he has selected are the cream of the crop and are all top notch execs otherwise Hubbard would not allow them to be here.

Unfortunately, the solution which tends to form in one's mind is that the person himself or herself is PTS at best and incompetent and degraded at the worst. It is hidden from them that other people have similar problems. The offending person is told that everyone else realizes they are lucky to be there, are happy to be there and are totally winning. One never finds out that others are having similar problems. You form an image of yourself as being a loser and being the only one who is not winning.
Lakey
 
Last edited:
Re: The old days - Aboard the Apollo - 1973

She is. :yes:

I also knew Mickey Lipton, way back in 1977. What a wonderful woman! She got married then. I was friends with her husband (they've long since been divorced, no children) and made contact with him again recently. He hasn't seen or spoken to her in a couple of years but he said she was fine - I believe he said she was remarried with children. I'll double check with him, I think he still has a way of contacting her.

Sorry I can't give you the name of Mickey's ex or any other details. He hasn't come out publicly yet and has a bit of a paranoid streak about Scn due to some bad past experiences with the GO/OSA, so he doesn't write me regularly, either. Mickey is fine though. :)

Sheila

I remember that Mickey Lipton was Mickey Mithoff (married to Bob Mithoff) before she married Kenny Lipton, the brother of Peggy Lipton, the star of the TV series, "The Mod Squad". Mickey and Kenny started dating in 1972 or 1973. When I left CCLA for the Apollo in October, 1973 I recall that they were already married.

To my understanding, Kenny Lipton died in Sept of 1998, see article below:


Obituary - From Alt Religion Scientology - Sept 6, 1998
Stacy Young reported that Kenny Lipton has died.

"I am deeply saddened to announce that Kenny Lipton died today after a long battle with lung cancer. Kenny was a long-time Sea Org member and Commodore's Messenger. He left Scientology several years ago and made a new life for himself, a good life, in Las Vegas. He was surrounded by family and friends when he passed away. All of us who considered him our friend will miss him very much."


There's some sort of mix up here, either Mickey married again but kept her surname of Lipton or something else. Kenny was on the Dianetic Internship in 1972, CCLA's 3rd ever Dianetic Interne (I was the 1st and Ira Hirsch was the 2nd). Kenny wanted a pc and I wanted Dianetic auditing so he used be as his pc and audited me through to Dianetic completion. At that point he graduated the interneship. He drove a VW Karman Ghia and audited at his room about a mile from the Org. We worked well together. He was very "safe" and caring as an auditor. He was a really nice guy, unusually friendly, kind and soulful.
Lakey
 
Last edited:
Re: Psychopathic Domination

In Scientology, out of Scientology, this is the problem we face: :omg::omg::omg: From article, this explains--for those needing explanation--as to why/how the honest person can get nailed on a security check while the pathologically inclined skate on through. Emphasis below is mine:

http://www.whale.to/b/callahan1.html

When you understand the true nature of psychopathic influence, that it is conscienceless, emotionless, selfish, cold and calculating, and devoid of any moral or ethical standards, you are horrified, but at the same time everything suddenly begins to makes sense. Our society is ever more soulless because the people who lead it and who set the example are soulless – they literally have no conscience.

In his book Political Oenology, Andrej Lobaczewski explains that clinical psychopaths enjoy advantages even in non-violent competitions to climb the ranks of social hierarchies. Because they can lie without remorse (and without the telltale physiological stress that is measured by lie detector tests), psychopaths can always say whatever is necessary to get what they want. In court, for example, psychopaths can tell extreme bald-faced lies in a plausible manner, while their sane opponents are handicapped by an emotional predisposition to remain within hailing distance of the truth. Too often, the judge or jury imagines that the truth must be somewhere in the middle, and then issues decisions that benefit the psychopath. As with judges and juries, so too with those charged with decisions concerning who to promote and who not to promote in corporate, military and governmental hierarchies. The result is that all hierarchies inevitably become top-heavy with psychopaths. Since psychopaths have no limitations on what they can or will do to get to the top, the ones in charge are generally pathological. It is not power that corrupts, it is that corrupt individuals seek power.​

Thanks for this article and the link.....very, very useful.

Also thanks for the pics of the little one. She is most adorable and sounds like a very gifted child.
 
Re: The old days - Aboard the Apollo - 1973

In the vein of our Ted's submissions of interesting and useful thought, here is a video I came across today.

It's one the subject of kids learning and some views on helping them do so.

[video=youtube;ebJHzpEy4bE]http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=ebJHzpEy4bE#![/video]

Fantastic video! I love this concept.
 
Re: Psychopathic Domination

This really hits home Ted! I was even able to apply it to my original theme when starting this thread, i.e., The Old Days Aboard the Apollo!

Imagine a garden variety type of person who still has some soul left and buys into Hubbard and Scientology hook, line and sinker. After about 3 years of studying Hubbard and doing services, the person shows up on the Flag Ship Apollo. The person is indoctrinated into believing that Hubbard is the wisest being in the Universe and that only his most loyal and elite followers are on the ship with him and are serving him in both running the ship and running world wide Scientology.

What one finds upon arriving on the ship is that most of the higher ranking personel are psychotics and they have been conditioned to the point where they are totally souless. Many of them seem to actually love intimidating their juniors, humiliating them, punishing them, destroying their lives. They act very self important, as if they are really "big shots". They put up a front that they have much more important things to do but now they have to use their valuable time to clean up their incompetent junior. They blame their hapless junior for derailing them from their true duties. The juniors are made to feel degraded and incompetent.

Some people who were on the Apollo in 1973 who, in my opinion, fit this description perfectly were Sandy Wilhere (RIP), Maria Starkey and Sue Anderson. The guy who picked people up from the airport was another psycho but I don't know his name.

The leadership ranks were full of psychotics weilding power though by no means were all the leaders psychotic. Ken Urquhart had a very high post and remained a very caring and sane person, just as an example. I did not know Faceinthecrowd, but obviously, he has a lot of soul as well.

For a new person arriving there and being relatively inexperienced, living day to day while being led by psychotics is exceedingly harmful to one's feeling good about themselves. The newer person can't compute that all these psychotics have leadership on the ship. The computation is that Hubbard is here on the ship and he is always right. These leaders who he has selected are the cream of the crop and are all top notch execs otherwise Hubbard would not allow them to be here.

Unfortunately, the solution which tends to form in one's mind is that the person himself or herself is PTS at best and incompetent and degraded at the worst. It is hidden from them that other people have similar problems. The offending person is told that everyone else realizes they are lucky to be there, are happy to be there and are totally winning. One never finds out that others are having similar problems. You form an image of yourself as being a loser and being the only one who is not winning.
Lakey

If people were allowed to talk to one another about what they were experiencing in Scientology and the problems they were having, they would have soon found out that they weren't alone. They would have been able to put the pieces together and would have found out the truth. The fact that people are not allowed to talk to one another about their so called "case", or problems that they may be having in life, makes it so that they are unable to compare notes, and allows this kind of BS to continue.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top