I'd agree that what you say is very true and - as you point out - stats are vital for a business.
My point is this this thread on a message board is not a business . A particular thread may well be the seen as the best accomplishment in life by someone who " created " it. So, some people can get way obsessed over all kinds of details that almost all other people ignore with impunity.
Raising my two kids was my best accomplishment - Also, keeping a marriage together 29 years and still being good friends after a divorce is something to be proud of and then running a local home remodeling company for 36 years, though having no construction background myself, is another point of pride.
As far as starting this thread, that is not the best accomplishment in life. If that is one's best accomplishment, they haven't had much of a life. Starting a thread gives one some exposure and a little name recognition on ESMB and provides a place where you can state your opinions and have a few dozen or a few hundred or maybe even a few thousand people read what you say. That's about it - I mean ESMB is not that big of a forum, Scientology itself or ex - Scientology are specialty fields, not a big arena widely read by the general public.
A thread is a thread and runs whatever course it runs. Well....usually.
On most boards the mods step in when required, but, there are times when self-appointed board nannies try to tell posters what is and is not allowed to be poster on "their" thread.
Some people really do think they "own" or are entited to "control" a thread independant of the mods or board owner because why ? It IS their thread !
I just decided to keep the hat of the OP or host. It's not my thread but I feel qualified to host it. When someone new shows up, I welcome them. I try and acknowledge well written posts, escpecially ones I don't fully agree with. Other people don't have the time for this type of thing. I am retired now and have time to host the thread.
Oh well.
Here on a board that is ESMB we have this thread that seems to currently works very hard to divert attention off anything related to scn or the doings of the " church ".
Who cares, plenty of threads of people having their say about scn.
I don't think we are working very hard to divert attention off of the doings of the church and as you point out plenty of other threads are talking about scn.
We've covered just about everything there is to cover in that area. Sometimes there is a lull when not many new and major things are happening and so someone will post a photo display on wildlife or cats, dogs or nature and someone else will post some good rock music while another will post classical music.
Let some major thing occur, such as the Debbie Cook story and this thread always has extensive discussion about it.
But, the direction this thread had taken maybe no wonder some people do not want their name associated with what is happening here these days.
Fair enough, no problem with that
I read this thread for humor. I find this thread a riot ( OK, maybe not in the ways some posters intended ). Yet, there was a time there were some serious contributors to the real history of Hubbard, the major players along the way, and the technology itself. That is IMPORTANT stuff that has been buried in trivia - and now, perhaps, " stats ".
You make some good points here. Yes the humor has been here including good common sense wisdom of the kind Will Rogers used to dispense. You and Face have provided some of the down home wisdom in a humorous manner. Another good point is that the thread is so large that a lot of the major contributions about the history, the major players along the way and the tech are now buried among trivia.
Here again, it would be nice if this thread was culled and the most meaningful articles pulled out and put into an ebook. I don't know if anybody will actually do this but it should be done. We have a treasure hear of brilliant articles!!!
As has been suggested before, the good stuff - and make no mistake about it - there has been some really good and important things that have seen the light of day on this thread by the real people who were there either watching it happen firsthand or were directly involved in making it happen. That IS the history that should be pulled out of the trivia.
Who has the time to do this or the know how and the software savy? It would really be a project worth investing in. Maybe we could hire it done.
But, nevermind, dredge up which people no longer want their name on what this thread has become and drool over the "page hits" and maybe even masturbate over the number of views per day. Yeah stats ! Hip Hip Hooray !
I just can't conceive of why this bothers you! I mentioned that the number of names listed as reading the thread dropped in 4 days from 428 down to 424 so some people are choosing the option to delist their name. I made no effort to find out which people did that. I thought someone might make a comment that OSA was on the move now, reading ESMB and that was why people were delisting.
On the hits, I think that is interesting. You can bet that if we reach 1,000,000 hits, several of us will mention it. That would be quite an achievement on a specialized website such as ESMB. I use the hits category to determine if it is worth my time to post here. If hits were 100 a day, I might only spend 15 minutes a day reading and posting on ESMB. If hits are 1,500 a day, I might spend an hour and a half. How does that hurt you? I just don't get it.
Why not apply live and let live in the area of how many hits a site gets. You don't think it is relevant and I like tracking it. Why do we have to agree. Can't with both just do what we like as long as it doesn't hurt anybody?
Meanwhile, the thread will trudge on no matter how many bumps it takes or who comes or who goes... it has been given a life of its own !