What's new
By:
Filters

AOSH ANZO return address.... WTF ?

R

randomx

Patron with Honors
aosh anzo are using a return address

Quantum Solutions, pvt bag 92901, onehunga, auckland 1643.

Googling Quantum Solutions-Auckland you get

QUANTUM SOLUTIONS LIMITED

Company Number: 941853
Incorporation Date: 1999-02-11
Status: Registered
Entity Type: Company
Constitution Filed: Yes
Annual Return Filing Month: March

Address Details
Registered Office, since 2010, Mar 5th:
135b Portsmouth Road, Bombay, Auckland 2765
Address for Communication, since 2010, Feb 27th:
P O Box 6, Bombay, Auckland 2343
Address for Service, since 2010, Mar 5th:
135b Portsmouth Road, Bombay, Auckland 2765
Directors
MOORE, Lynda Katrina since 1999, Feb 11th
135b Portsmouth Road, Bombay, Auckland 2765
Share Parcels
50,000 shares on the register:

98.00% (49,000 shares) owned by
TRUSTEES OF THE MOORE FAMILY TRUST (also owns) of 135b Portsmouth Road, Bombay, Auckland 2765
2.00% (1,000 shares) owned by
MOORE, Lynda Katrina (also owns) of 135b Portsmouth Road, Bombay, Auckland 2765
Check if QUANTUM SOLUTIONS LIMITED owns other companies.

Documents registered
Experimental: This feature is still under development. If this does not work please email us and please include some details.

Source: The New Zealand Companies Office.

:confused2:
 
Dulloldfart

Dulloldfart

Squirrel Extraordinaire
Maybe they are just using a mailing house to send out their promo, and the private bag number is allocated to them. Could this be the reason?

I'm just guessing.

Paul
 
Clueless Morgan

Clueless Morgan

Patron with Honors
Maybe it's a WISE company trying to help them filtering out all the "bomb threats" and "anthrax attacks" from Anonymous :D :D :D
 
R

randomx

Patron with Honors
scan of return address

This is just from your standard letterbox garbage from scio.
 

Attachments

  • scio001.jpg
    scio001.jpg
    47.5 KB · Views: 46
Once bitten

Once bitten

Patron Meritorious
I hate to upset the apple cart, but this is actually QUANTIUM with an I. It's a bonafide mail sorting company, where the cofs has its NZ mail returned to. What they do with it then is anyone's business, but this is nothing sinister. Sorry randomx.

http://www.med.govt.nz/templates/Page____27598.aspx

We all get excited about finding out stuff about the cofs, but we have to be careful with watching spelling and jumping in boots and all without checking stuff like spelling.

Not wanting to be a wet blanket or anything ....
 
U

ULRC/S

Patron with Honors
Once bitten said:
I hate to upset the apple cart, but this is actually QUANTIUM with an I. It's a bonafide mail sorting company, where the cofs has its NZ mail returned to.
Click to expand...

The CoS has spare money to pay for a mail service, but can't buy toilet paper...? Seems like another example of weird thinking.

Regards, Allen
 
Dulloldfart

Dulloldfart

Squirrel Extraordinaire
ULRC/S said:
The CoS has spare money to pay for a mail service, but can't buy toilet paper...? Seems like another example of weird thinking.

Regards, Allen
Click to expand...

We used to have a "stuffing machine" at Saint Hill. This (large) photo looks like the exact model: http://www.cre8mail.com/images/equipment/Almaster6.jpg

It was a wondrous (and very expensive) machine, it really was. I was Dir Comm in 1979 and it was my job to get the Auditor mag out. This involved staying up for a few nights and running maybe 40,000 mags through this machine and inserting them into expensive paper envelopes. It was very engrammic to do the cycle! When the machine was broken, as sometimes happened, we would have the crew sitting at tables after post for several days hand-stuffing it at "stuffing parties."

A year later the org contracted a mailing house. They stuffed the mag into polythene heat-sealed envelopes. It was far cheaper than what we had been doing, and far far easier, as the crew weren't involved at all. I got curious and went round there to see what kind of machine they had. I wondered if it was similar to the one we had. So what did it look like?

It was a bunch of women sitting around a large table stuffing the mags by hand!

But it WAS cheaper than what we had been doing.

Paul
 
Lurker5

Lurker5

Gold Meritorious Patron
ULRC/S said:
The CoS has spare money to pay for a mail service, but can't buy toilet paper...? Seems like another example of weird thinking.

Regards, Allen
Click to expand...

Scn should re-use all that returned paper, in the bathrooms . . .
 
N

Ned Kelly

Patron
ULRC/S said:
The CoS has spare money to pay for a mail service, but can't buy toilet paper...? Seems like another example of weird thinking.

Regards, Allen
Click to expand...

Allen, they operate on a Hubbard policy which says something like this. "It's the size of your orgs CF and the number of mailings to it that determines your gross income". Based on the premise that the more you outflow the more you inflow. Has some truth that one does need to promote, but in orgs they just send out loads of crap to people who don't want it and just chuck it in the garbage without reading it. It is a huge waste of money the way they promote - but that is why they can always find money for promo. I suppose they do not consider a good crap or piss as legitimate form of outflow.:confused2:
 
Dulloldfart

Dulloldfart

Squirrel Extraordinaire
Ned Kelly said:
Allen, they operate on a Hubbard policy which says something like this. "It's the size of your orgs CF and the number of mailings to it that determines your gross income". Based on the premise that the more you outflow the more you inflow. Has some truth that one does need to promote, but in orgs they just send out loads of crap to people who don't want it and just chuck it in the garbage without reading it. It is a huge waste of money the way they promote - but that is why they can always find money for promo. I suppose they do not consider a good crap or piss as legitimate form of outflow.:confused2:
Click to expand...

What would be highly amusing if it weren't so tragic is this. The "statistics" that this is based on, according to Hubbard, are a period of several weeks back in 1964 in Washington, or something, if I remember it right. Hubbard noticed that the income followed the outflow at that time and place.

50 years later that one single tiny sample for a couple of months for one org, although it hasn't held true for decades, still determines this insane policy for the entire planet-wide structure.

When I was FBO at Saint Hill in 1974 I had the two graphs, Gross Income and Bulk Mail Out, and I used to show them to the Dir Comm trying to push through a rush purchase order for even more postage money to be wasted. I pointed out that there was NO correlation at all. The words fell on deaf ears. Since Hubbard said it was true it was true, and don't try and confuse the issue with facts!

Paul
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top