that was enlightening.
so if scientology is reverse processing, what is reverse scientology processing? processing?
it's not linear. It's an ever dwindling spiral. See 'Black Hole'
Zinj
that was enlightening.
so if scientology is reverse processing, what is reverse scientology processing? processing?
I have read issues that talk about critics of scientology being considered anti-scientologists, which is just another way of saying Supppressive Persons, IMO.
We know that LRH wrote issues declaring SPs fair game. We also know that he wrote that one of the things that should be done with such people, if they show up at Qual, is that they should be reverse processed.
I'm wondering if the decision to leave staff actually is seen as reason to consider a person a critic/anti/SP, and if at this point, Qual starts reverse processing them, and if the Leaving Staff Sec Check isn't this in practice. Certainly, on mine, they never let me flatten anything they found, and asserted I had more that I had not told them, which is reverse processing if you ask me!
Thoughts? Are leaving staff routing forms pretty much naive, really being nothing more than a signal to management that they need to destroy this person?
We already know that "processing" does not work so why worry about "reverse processing"?
I got enough black affirmations thrown at me to last me this whole lifetime, from 'em, Geeez! (not affected by them anymore, btw, but some of 'em...took me a long time to get out of my soul!)The guy who was doing mine was in a hell of a bind, then, because while admin idiots who don't understand the tech at all might think anybody leaving means they are "blowing" (a blow is ONLY a sudden, unexplained departure), I was actually leaving because my wife was pregnant, and I thought the most ethical thing I could do was get a job that paid enough money to support my family, and be a paying PUBLIC, so that I could get the services I needed to later come back as a better staff member.
Link to document referencing the bit about reverse processing SPs
We already know that "processing" does not work so why worry about "reverse processing"?

