What's new

CoS threatens to sue Wikileaks

Anon678_

Patron
It's not that they win. It's that even if they lose it doesn't affect them in the slightest. The site has at least one server in switzerland with the same hosting as the pirate bay (Not sure where I heard that), and huge numbers of dns addresses. Wikileaks isn't going down any time soon.

Not to mention $cientologys hilarious demand for evidece from a site specifically designed to store NO records.

Edit, wikileaks down, probably due to overload of legitimate traffic.
 

Dulloldfart

Squirrel Extraordinaire
Wikileaks: Scientology_UK_Annual_Returns_2005

http://www.wikileaks.org/wiki/Scientology_UK_Annual_Returns_2005

Can anyone make sense of this? It looks like the UK CofS has £6M in the bank! I don't believe they have that much cash on hand.

I can't see that unused prepayments received are being reported as a liability. The figure must be in the tens of millions by now, although that is my opinion. I can't remember the actual figures from when I last saw them.

Paul
 

Kathy (ImOut)

Gold Meritorious Patron
It appears their current net assets are $10.3 million. I don't know how that relates to US dollars. They also appear to have a lot of of other assets. Since they took in $10.3 million but spent more than that in 2005.

These financial statements are a bit different than how we prepare them in the States.
 

Alanzo

Bardo Tulpa
Wikileaks' Response to the Church's Threats

Wikileaks' Response

Scientology threatens Wikileaks over secret cult bibles

From Wikileakshttp://wikileaks.se/wiki/Scientology_threatens_Wikileaks_over_secret_cult_bibles#searchInput
WIKILEAKS PRESS RELEASE

Monday April 7, 2008

The Scientology cult, of which Hollywood actors Tom Cruise and John Travolta are the most familiar public followers, has threatened transparency group Wikileaks, demanding that it remove "unpublished, copyrighted" Scientology documents. The Scientology documents, which were released by Wikileaks last month, are restricted from the public and low ranking cult members.

The March 27 letter, from the cult's Los Angeles lawyers, Moxon & Kobrin also asked, in an apparent attempt to trace the source of the materials, that Wikileaks preserve any related records, "..not limited to, logs, data entry sheets, applications -- electronic or otherwise, registrations forms, billings statements or invoices, computer print-outs, disks, hard drives, etc.". However, the Wikileaks site, by design, keeps no logs of its submissions, or even of its readers.

The cult's lawyers presented Wikileaks with a list of copyright registrations for its secret "religious technology" made with the United States Copyright Office and some examples of international court cases related to previous Scientology legal attacks on publishers. These examples reveal part of a long history of reported Scientology abuse of the legal system and are clearly aimed at putting pressure on Wikileaks to remove the content.
The documents, according to the legal letter, are owned by a Scientology holding company, the Religious Technology Center (RTC), which claims ownership of the "confidential Advanced Technology of the Scientology religion" — the secret "bibles" of the cult.

The content, consisting of typed as well as hand-written pages by the cult founder, the late science fiction writer and con-man L. Ron Hubbard, describes OT "levels" I-VIII as well as related "NOTs" and other aspects of cult dogma and operations. The public is usually introduced to the cult through its "free stess test" stalls, L. Ron Hubbard's book 1950's pseudo-science book "Dianetics", or fronts such as Narconon, Criminon and the Citizens Commission on Human Rights. Cult members are normally thoroughly indoctrinated before they are introduced to higher level Scientology "bibles", such as "OT-III", which describe all human problems as having being originated by the evil galactic overlord, Xenu, some 75 million years ago. While parts of the material have appeared previously, if briefly due to legal action, others parts appear to be original to the Wikileaks release.

Wikileaks will not comply with legally abusive requests from Scientology any more than Wikileaks has complied with similar demands from Swiss banks, London Banks, Russian off-shore stem cell centers, former African Kleptocrats, or the Pentagon. Wikileaks will remain a place where people of the world may safely expose injustice and corruption. Indeed, in response to the attempted suppression, Wikileaks will release several thousand pages of additional Scientology materials next week. See
See also
External links

A good example of the methods the cult has used to silence journalists appears here: An excellent biography of L. Ron Hubbard by U.K. investigative journalist Russel Miller appears here: Scientology front goups:
 

hartley

Patron with Honors
Oh phooey, it's just the standard Avagram. Even I've got one of those. The long backlog on 'secret scriptures' is long, it took her years to find my copy of OT3.
:thumbsup:

Look, we could have done this any time over the past few years, put the 'secrets' up on hundreds of websites, on Pirate Bay, on PtP, on bittorrent. It has suited us to pretend they are 'secret' because that makes good press copy. I've lost count of the number of daring investigative journalists who have gone undercover to reveal the secretive world of Scientology for the first time. It's had zero effect because no one wanted to know, until Anonymous made a Youtube video.

Now, it suits us to 'leak' them and make another story from that. When in a few days the press have forgotten about this, we'll leak some more. Then we'll leak the 'real' secrets. The cult is like Richard Nixon's White House, they record and video and document everything without noticing they are doing it.
 

dr3k

Patron with Honors
Gee, I wonder who on Earth would give ALL THIS STUFF to Wikileaks. Evil freaking suppressives, the lot of you!
 
Top