What's new

Does Space have Fabric?

uniquemand

Unbeliever
Not that I took drugs but - saying to someone that it's good to take LSD and have those experiences and feelings?
- F**k him!

Hmm... that's not what I said. Check again.

However, I'll say it NOW. I enjoy LSD whenever I get a chance to get access to it and the situation is nice and peaceful. I'm sorry if you object to my enjoyment of LSD.

Back to our regularly scheduled programming.
 

VaD

Gold Meritorious Patron
Hmm... that's not what I said. Check again.

However, I'll say it NOW. I enjoy LSD whenever I get a chance to get access to it and the situation is nice and peaceful. I'm sorry if you object to my enjoyment of LSD.

Back to our regularly scheduled programming.

Enjoy your LSD.

Could you tell us about benefits of "LSD awareness"?
 

uniquemand

Unbeliever
I could, but this is not the thread for it. In fact, I think I already have. However, I think Timothy Leary did a better job of it in his "Info-Psychology" - Leary, Timothy. 1987. Falcon Press. (revision of "Exo-Psychology")(ISBN 1-56184-105-6)
 

La La Lou Lou

Crusader
Zorg I wasn't trying to be nasty. LSD can give you this type of experience, it did to me, and yet the recruiter insisted that it wasn't LSD I took, so that I became a stat.

It seemed like the lights where turned to twice the brightness, I felt a breeze on my face, and felt the speed the planet was travelling at. I had a very strong feeling that the universe was not really there but like a holographic 3d image. I also felt open and enlightened, and a very strong affinity.

Your experience sounds wonderful, and I am not knocking it. Meditation can make these things happen. Chemicals can too.

Marijuana definitely didn't help enlightenment, the universe became darker, rubbery and colourless and I became paranoid.

That was all before I became a drug free scientologist. Then I had moments of understanding on basic courses but nothing amazing, then after a while the only strange experiences were the hallucinations from lack of sleep and food.

I have come across people who had LSD trips 30 years after they took the stuff. Not good ones either, weird scary trips. I had been lucky.
 

uniquemand

Unbeliever
Thanks, for that, La La Lou Lou. I've had the scaries, too. I don't necessarily recommend it for others! Was good for me.
 

VaD

Gold Meritorious Patron
Ok!

I'm glad that Vinaire has no other "ideas" to "help us".

UniqueMand is still here (he still wants people's blood (i.e "philosophy")
 

Student of Trinity

Silver Meritorious Patron
I guess that's my biggest beef. It seems possible (even likely) that other places in the universe might be drastically different ... and with our limited observations/measurements from this one tiny location, we just don't know.

It's the "everywhere" part that I have trouble with. Our collected data is so localized ... and it just seems to me that relative certainty in a singular big bang 14 or so billion years ago is premature. I too don't really care either way, but it just feels like there's a tendency by some to forget how localized the observed data set might really still be. And my "earth is flat" radar starts to kick in.
Well, but in a sense we do see everywhere, or pretty close to it. It is consistent with all the data we can see, that everything we see once occupied a much smaller volume. But the thing is, we will probably never see anything from outside that volume, or be affected by it in any way — because our volume is expanding too rapidly for light to reach us from outside it. So for practical purposes, our entire universe was once small and hot, and has expanded and cooled. Anything beyond our vision is probably forever irrelevant to us; it might as well be another universe.

Or maybe not. Maybe there are wormholes. Or maybe we'll learn to see even earlier, more distant signals, and they'll start showing a new pattern. But the Big Bang theory is not just arbitrary or naive. It's got a pretty impressive combination of simplicity and accuracy. For what it's worth, as a hypothesis it ran dead against all theoretical prejudice at the time it was introduced, and won acceptance in the teeth of strong opposition.

About space holding objects: maybe I just don't understand your concern, but I suspect you may simply be reading too much in to the notion that 'space is nothing'. Space is pretty insubstantial, I grant. But I wouldn't exactly call it nothing.

For instance, no force I know of, not even the hottest supernova, can hold back the course of time. Each instant will pass, and the next succeed, and pass in its turn. It as though everything is stuck to a moving treadmill that drags us steadily into the future. What force can hold everything so tightly? And yet it is not really a force. It is simply the nature of time and of existence in time. To ask what holds us fast to the treadmill of time is really only to ask what holds the present ... in the present.

In the same way we can ask what holds us within the three dimensions of space. There are some (entirely speculative) theories according to which our three dimensions are simply a sort of interface between hypervolumes in a space of higher dimensionality, and we and everything we see simply happen to be stuck in this interface region, like leaves floating on a river, held by surface tension between air and water. In those theories there are various forces that hold us within our three dimensional space. These forces are not simply 'nothing'.

Alternatively, there may simply not be any more than three dimensions. Then there is simply nowhere else to go, except to follow the curvature of spacetime. There does not have to be any fifth dimension into which spacetime is expanding, and into which objects could in principle escape. The theory of curved spacetime is formulated entirely in terms of four-dimensional geometry, without reference to any higher dimensions.

How can space expand without expanding into some higher dimension? Well, perhaps you could imagine that no points of space are moving anywhere, and that the expansion of the universe is simply that inches and light years are subject to inflation. The same chocolate bar that cost fifty cents ten years ago costs a dollar today. The same set of points in space that measured ten light years a while ago measure twenty light years now. Nothing has to move.

Anyway, to me the bottom line is that if your definition of 'nothing' means something that can't possibly confine objects, then space does not fit your definition of 'nothing'. In some sense, it is something.
 

VaD

Gold Meritorious Patron
Space is space.

Fabric is fabric.

OP question: Does Space have Fabric?

- Can you say, "no, it doesn't!"
 

Gadfly

Crusader
Yet I would contend my fabric has space.

Wow, finally something here that makes some sense.

Yep, my fabric has space too! :thumbsup:

I have been having some really deep thoughts about the "fabric of my shirts" and "the fabric of my sheets". And, since they all exist "in space", there ya go - there is no end to the fabric(s) in space! :unsure:


++++++++++
 

The Great Zorg

Gold Meritorious Patron
Space is space.

Fabric is fabric.

OP question: Does Space have Fabric?

- Can you say, "no, it doesn't!"

You Russians are so decisive and controversial!

I think conclusions are not allowed on this thread.

Fucking Russians! :angry:

Sorry Vlad; I'm Ukrainian descent... still working on removing my programmed hatred of everything and anything Russian. :grouch:


395px-HolodomorCalgary.jpg


Голодомор

You're Ok though. :yes:

So is Russia. Now. :yes:

I hope my family doesn't see me writing this. :unsure:

...and now back to our previously scheduled discussion on the fabric of space and...
 
big bang - who lit a match to it?

What I don't get about the big bang is what proceeded it. It seems to be basic physics, you can't just have a bunch of something just appear and explode. About the only explaination I have is this universe was created by the implosion of a giant black hole creating another universe and spewing all of the matter through out it.

It kinda reminds me of the end of Men in Black II a universe in a universe ad infinitum like those nesting russian :happydance: dolls.

Some thing I saw on line the other day - somebody thought the universe proceeded from a straight line. WTF? That really doesn't make any sense.

I can't claim to have studied the Big Bang theory in any detail, what does it say proceeded it?

Mimsey
 

Mystic

Crusader
Big Bang. Deeeeeep Fabric!

What did God say when He had His First Orgasm?

"BIG BANG!"

What did Goddess say when She had Her First Orgasm?

Giggling: "Do it again."
 
Top