Voltaire's Child
Fool on the Hill
There is a third moderator, Ceres.
RL
Ah! I didn't know that.
If we get one named Kali, we're toast, though.
There is a third moderator, Ceres.
RL
Maybe there should be a Category called The Halfway House?![]()
This is an EX Scientologists board. Departed, gone, left Scientology. IMO that includes the Freezone. Yes, people sometimes need to hang on to parts of Scientology and gradually understand the bigger picture, if that's appropriate for them. Some perhaps never will. That's what freedom of choice is all about, and I am sure is why Emma included a Freezone section.
Emma's original post was about ESMB being "used" by that Freezone section to change the perception of what ESMB really is. That's the crux of the matter.
I wouldn't. I know others who wouldn't.
People are individuals.
As soon as I've read this thread I shall start a new one where others can take pot shots at me.
.
. I think it comes down to any perceived attempts at recruitment and "selling" of FZ services that is the crux of the matter. I think this can be achieved if people really are honest and respect what we are trying to do here.
We should know by now not to get coerced or tricked into something we don't want. I may never do another thing with the "tech" but I do find comfort in the fact that if I really want to do my OT levels or anything else, that I have the choice and that there are some links, that others on the boards have posted, to the Freezone, Class VIII tapes AND to Madman and Mesiah and other critical Scientology books, Ron's insane web of lies Military history, whyaretheydead website, etc.It's funny you should mention that - I have been meaning to start a thread on the stages of 'leaving' which certainly do seem to align with this.
Hey - here's an idea...maybe we could all have a letter after our name per the above! I'm an "A".![]()
And FTS this is an really good idea, it would give some of us a chance to reevaluate where we stand, I have no doubt this forum helps us to move through things and it would be a very healing and healthy topic to discuss.
Oh and by the way, just incase no one had noticed..
I'm an "A" too.. Yes it was non-sequitor .. but my 2 pence comment made me think of it ...
.. no..
I lost the plot and ended up in no mans land. :confused2:
like so, however I do realize that it's me who needs to somehow deal with this and not just jump off the cliff without even breathing..
You were right when you said it was a 'hot post', I agree, the hottest one I've ever experienced to date. 
After the Church of Scientology, and "TNX", and then Beliefnet, I told myself that I would never subject myself to censorship again on a Scientology message board, or in any other part of life.
It's just not worth it.
I'm afraid I have no respect for the rules when it comes to censorship. Psych spam is one thing, because it is not communication.
But Roan's post was communication, and it was an important point he was making, and it was on-topic and very relevant. It should not have been censored in the first place.
Therefore, I stand by what I did, and I support Roan in what he did. We made sure that his communication got through, and made it as difficult as possible for the censor to do his job.
In this instance, I remain unhandled, and unapologetic.
Kill me if you want.
I don't care.
After the Church of Scientology, and "TNX", and then Beliefnet, I told myself that I would never subject myself to censorship again on a Scientology message board, or in any other part of life.
It's just not worth it.
I'm afraid I have no respect for the rules when it comes to censorship. Psych spam is one thing, because it is not communication.
But Roan's post was communication, and it was an important point he was making, and it was on-topic and very relevant. It should not have been censored in the first place.
Therefore, I stand by what I did, and I support Roan in what he did. We made sure that his communication got through, and made it as difficult as possible for the censor to do his job.
In this instance, I remain unhandled, and unapologetic.
Kill me if you want.
I don't care.
"Kill me if you want"? Oh Alanzo!![]()
![]()
Don't you agree that personal attacks have no place here? From what I have seen it is not the message but the way it was delivered. As Emma says, "If we have no moderation we might as well call ourselves a.r.s and to hell with it. " I really wouldn't want that, would you?