Gadfly
Crusader
After being accused of being a Freezoner, and a Hypnotist tonight, and all the other things I have been fighting against and writing about for the last 9 years, and then listening to an ear-splitting slab of Rush, I've realized that people will target "other" ideas for whatever they will in order to keep their present mindset intact.
While that may have been a major run-on sentence, it still reflects something that is basically human, and something that we must all come to terms with after Scientology.
OK. That was another very long and convoluted sentence, but you get what I mean: You adopt a mindset and then you defend it against everything different.
There's something wrong with that.
I am no longer a Scientologist.
And I am no longer an Ex-Scientologist.
There's a reason for that.
Even a series of reasons.
All my reasons exist for well-founded reasons, completely independent, and logically consistent with my conclusion.
Can you say the same?
I get it. The idea is to free oneself from the Scientology paradigm completely.
Being against something in actual fact ties you to the thing that you are "against". This has to do with "non-resistance". Being for or against something BOTH keep you attached to the thing or area.
Calling oneself an "ex" anything still keeps alive the original postulate - being that you originally defined yourself as that thing. But, BEFORE THAT, you had no relationship to it at all. Complete indifference. THAT is the winning attitude regarding any past bad experience. Let it go completely, and it no longer exists for you on ANY level.
TOTAL UNCONCERN, TOTAL INDIFFERENCE
Ones view, to be free of anything, would be not unlike how you might consider or feel about a green ant on the butt of a purple elephant in a small crater on the dark side of the moon. How would you consider such a thing? Not at all. It would have ZERO meaning and significance for you.
Bye bye Ron.
Bye bye Scientology.
Whhooosssh! Vanishing in a cloud of fine smoke.

How about..............ME!
