What's new

Moxon's Son Blew!

Iknowtoomuch

Gold Meritorious Patron
Is it possible that they did blow but it has been "kept quiet" because of who his dad is?
Just throwing that out there.
 

Iknowtoomuch

Gold Meritorious Patron
That's OK, does not reflect badly upon you in any way, I just had to point out he's not a "reliable source". :thumbsup:



Well, that's a pretty fair indication that the "offloaded but still in good standing with C of $ theory" is correct. :wink2:

Michael "The Sneakster" Hobson
I am *not* anonymous.


Whoa there, we still don't have the entire story there Hobson. Don't jump to conclusions like you are telling him not to.
 

me myself & i

Patron Meritorious
That's OK, does not reflect badly upon you in any way, I just had to point out he's not a "reliable source". :thumbsup:

Amen brother. J. Swift is not a reliable source. He just makes stuff up. Now L. Ron Hubbard, he was a reliable source! Lol!

mm&i

Minds have been irreparably damaged Sneakster, and J. Swift didn't do it.
 

Iknowtoomuch

Gold Meritorious Patron
That's OK, does not reflect badly upon you in any way, I just had to point out he's not a "reliable source". :thumbsup:



Well, that's a pretty fair indication that the "offloaded but still in good standing with C of $ theory" is correct. :wink2:

Michael "The Sneakster" Hobson
I am *not* anonymous.



I suggest you work on your reading skills. :eyeroll:

I haven't made any statement of conclusion. :no:

Michael "The Sneakster" Hobson
I am *not* anonymous


I suggest you clear youe MU's.
Not reliable isn't a conclusion?

Do you have all the data in which to come to that conclusion yourself?
 

sparrow

Patron with Honors
I suggest you work on your reading skills. :eyeroll:

I haven't made any statement of conclusion. :no:

Michael "The Sneakster" Hobson
I am *not* anonymous


I'm sorry Sneakster but I just cannot take you seriously with that pink hat on!


No but I hear you bring up "not a reliable source" here and there.

You should treat EVERY source as "not reliable". Someone saying something is definitely NOT RELIABLE. (unless the subject is about their own person matters).

But if it's someone saying something about something else, only photographs and videos will suffice, imo.

Seriously, you need to lose the hat. I'll take it if you can shrink it down a bit.

I need some good humblin.... :D
 

Dulloldfart

Squirrel Extraordinaire
When was the last time you stood outside a cult building and called the cult a cult?

Like this? :)

http://forum.exscn.net/showthread.php?t=6051

sund_240508.jpg


Paul
 

sparrow

Patron with Honors
Point of courtesy/etiquette here:

Addressing someone by their bare last name without any proper titles, such as "Mister" is only done as an expression of disrespect and enforcement of a dominance heirarchy relationship - as between a boss and an employee or in the military when a superior is addressing an inferior.

You are neither of those things to me, Iknowtoomuch, so addressing me by my bare last name is both disrespectful and a personal insult.

If one is friendly to me, then addressing me by a shortened version of my (perhaps too cumbersome) nick "The Sneakster", such as "Sneaky" or "Sneaks" or by my first name, "Michael" or "Mike" is appropriate.

If you wish to be formal, then "Mr. Hobson".

After this, you may not say you have not been properly informed and I will take any further usage of my bare last name to address me as deliberate insult and aggression.

Michael "The Sneakster" Hobson
I am *not* anonymous


You are SO not Anonymous Sneaksta! What's it like to be insulted and aggressed? It's been so long I digress...
 

Iknowtoomuch

Gold Meritorious Patron
Point of courtesy/etiquette here:

Addressing someone by their bare last name without any proper titles, such as "Mister" is only done as an expression of disrespect and enforcement of a dominance heirarchy relationship - as between a boss and an employee or in the military when a superior is addressing an inferior.

You are neither of those things to me, Iknowtoomuch, so addressing me by my bare last name is both disrespectful and a personal insult.

If one is friendly to me, then addressing me by a shortened version of my (perhaps too cumbersome) nick "The Sneakster", such as "Sneaky" or "Sneaks" or by my first name, "Michael" or "Mike" is appropriate.

If you wish to be formal, then "Mr. Hobson".

After this, you may not say you have not been properly informed and I will take any further usage of my bare last name to address me as deliberate insult and aggression.

Michael "The Sneakster" Hobson
I am *not* anonymous



Everything is a negative to you isn't it. Can you say semantic! Señor Hobson.
 

Alanzo

Bardo Tulpa
Point of courtesy/etiquette here:

Addressing someone by their bare last name without any proper titles, such as "Mister" is only done as an expression of disrespect and enforcement of a dominance heirarchy relationship - as between a boss and an employee or in the military when a superior is addressing an inferior.

You are neither of those things to me, Iknowtoomuch, so addressing me by my bare last name is both disrespectful and a personal insult.

If one is friendly to me, then addressing me by a shortened version of my (perhaps too cumbersome) nick "The Sneakster", such as "Sneaky" or "Sneaks" or by my first name, "Michael" or "Mike" is appropriate.

If you wish to be formal, then "Mr. Hobson".

After this, you may not say you have not been properly informed and I will take any further usage of my bare last name to address me as deliberate insult and aggression.

Michael "The Sneakster" Hobson
I am *not* anonymous

In high school and college I used to call all my friends by their bare last names.

Like, "Hey Hobson! Don't bogart that roach, man!! Pass it on, dude!"

And "Whoa, check out Hobson! Did he drink that whole keg by himself? ALL RIGHT HOBSON!!!!"

So using someone's bare last name is not always an insult, or attempting to subjugate them. It is also used among equals with high affinity.
 
Top