What's new
By:
Filters

Radio interview - Truth Be Told Radio

B

bondservant4jesuschrist

New Member
I have a radio show, that I would like to have an ex-Scientologist who is now a Christian. I would like to have them on the show this Sunday, but if not then, then in the near future. I would first like to hear your testimony before the show, so I can see if you would make a good guest. My show is on 2pm-4pm on Sundays.
 
degraded being

degraded being

Sponsor
bondservant4jesuschrist said:
I have a radio show, that I would like to have an ex-Scientologist who is now a Christian. I would like to have them on the show this Sunday, but if not then, then in the near future. I would first like to hear your testimony before the show, so I can see if you would make a good guest. My show is on 2pm-4pm on Sundays.
Click to expand...

"bondservant4jesuschrist" sounds a bit kinky in an SM sort of way. Are you looking for someone who has converted from being fucked over by Ron to being fucked over by jesus? Jesus is more handsomer in the pictures I've seen. But ugly Ron makes domination a bit richer in a way......
 
I told you I was trouble

I told you I was trouble

Suspended animation
bondservant4jesuschrist said:
I have a radio show, that I would like to have an ex-Scientologist who is now a Christian. I would like to have them on the show this Sunday, but if not then, then in the near future. I would first like to hear your testimony before the show, so I can see if you would make a good guest. My show is on 2pm-4pm on Sundays.
Click to expand...


I would like to hear your testimony to make sure you are a good interviewer.

:coolwink:​
 
programmer_guy

programmer_guy

True Ex-Scientologist
"Truth be Told" is that Jeshua is a legendary historical person that most likely never existed as was told in the Synoptic Gospels.

The so called historical "Second Coming" (Olivet Discourse) is supposedly explained by several Bible commentators, over several hundred years, as happening in the destruction of Jerusalem in 70 AD. Three that I can think of, off the top of my head, are Eusebius ("Theophania" & "History of the Church"), John Lightfoot's commentaries on The Olivet Discourse, and Charles Spurgeon's comments on this same topic (i.e. the 2nd Coming occurred in the destruction of Jerusalem).

However, you might find a few ex-Scientologist christians on this message board that might want to participate in what you are asking for.
 
xguardian

xguardian

Patron with Honors
degraded being said:
"bondservant4jesuschrist" sounds a bit kinky in an SM sort of way. Are you looking for someone who has converted from being fucked over by Ron to being fucked over by jesus? Jesus is more handsomer in the pictures I've seen. But ugly Ron makes domination a bit richer in a way......
Click to expand...

You are indeed a DB...and your Antichrist spirit is disgusting.:coolwink:
 
xguardian

xguardian

Patron with Honors
programmer_guy said:
"Truth be Told" is that Jeshua is a legendary historical person that most likely never existed as was told in the Synoptic Gospels.

The so called historical "Second Coming" (Olivet Discourse) is supposedly explained by several Bible commentators, over several hundred years, as happening in the destruction of Jerusalem in 70 AD. Three that I can think of, off the top of my head, are Eusebius ("Theophania" & "History of the Church"), John Lightfoot's commentaries on The Olivet Discourse, and Charles Spurgeon's comments on this same topic (i.e. the 2nd Coming occurred in the destruction of Jerusalem).

However, you might find a few ex-Scientologist christians on this message board that might want to participate in what you are asking for.
Click to expand...

Truth be told as usual...you are "talking out of school." The literal destruction of Jerusalem in 70 AD is the "Type and Shadow" (forerunner) of the future "anti-type" described in Daniel and Revelation. Only ignorant "haters" deny the Historical Jesus!:coolwink: see...http://dmc.members.sonic.net/sentinel/naij3.html
 
LongTimeGone

LongTimeGone

Silver Meritorious Patron
I reckon JC was brought up reading the Old Testament and, thinking it was a load of rubbish, decided to start his own religion.
Then Hubbard was brought up reading the New Testament and, thinking it was a load of rubbish, decided to start his own religion.
For a Scientologist to leave Hubbard and then join JC's lot, he or she has only a couple more steps backwards to find the real truth.
LTG
 
Ogsonofgroo

Ogsonofgroo

Crusader
^^^ Hm, I recken if JC even existed he wasn't reading a fucking thing like every other serf and poor person of the age, they weren't big on education back then 'cept for the leet. If he knew how to read and write he probably would have written something eh.

Butt no.

:ipokeseyewithsharplogsmilie:
 
xguardian

xguardian

Patron with Honors
LongTimeGone said:
I reckon JC was brought up reading the Old Testament and, thinking it was a load of rubbish, decided to start his own religion.
Then Hubbard was brought up reading the New Testament and, thinking it was a load of rubbish, decided to start his own religion.
For a Scientologist to leave Hubbard and then join JC's lot, he or she has only a couple more steps backwards to find the real truth.
LTG
Click to expand...

Your Truth is your "religion" and it seems you religiously like to bash other observations of truth in order to elevate your limited and pedestrian theology or lack thereof as your fellow clique members (group think) here love to do even though not one of you is an ex-bible scholar that can intelligently defend your positions that world class atheist detractors have failed to do for over 2K years.

The list of scientists and atheist alike who seriously studied and researched it's (bible) entire field and were converted to truth by going forward instead of " a couple steps backward, is innumerable. However, these men & women understood they had to leave bias and prejudice out of their classroom.:clever:
 
X

xaxxat

Patron
xguardian said:
Your Truth is your "religion" and it seems you religiously like to bash other observations of truth in order to elevate your limited and pedestrian theology or lack thereof as your fellow clique members (group think) here love to do even though not one of you is an ex-bible scholar that can intelligently defend your positions that world class atheist detractors have failed to do for over 2K years.

The list of scientists and atheist alike who seriously studied and researched it's (bible) entire field and were converted to truth by going forward instead of " a couple steps backward, is innumerable. However, these men & women understood they had to leave bias and prejudice out of their classroom.:clever:
Click to expand...

Name them...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top