Re: Skirmish over YT video of Mike Rinder black PRing Gerry Armstrong and Graham Berr
-snip-
What I saw in that video is Rinder poo-poo'ing the idea, framed by the Journalist, that Gerry has been constantly under attack by OSA ever since those original court cases in the Armstrong vs CofS days. I really don't know the whole truth of this thing, I've read plenty about it and plenty of claims to the effect that the harassment continues to this day but I don't know how true those claims may be.
-snip-
And I doubt you'll be convinced by what follows, and I don't want to argue with you.
However, others may be interested.
I think calling it "Black PR" may be causing some confusion. It is Black PR, but, more simply, it's just plain lying.
This is a bit complicated, and I've just located a few old posts and included them below.
There's much more occurring than what I've noted below, but bear with me, as I present these few posts - each a kind of snapshot.
__________
Post A:
It was almost two decades ago that David Mayo wrote, "
I am not a Scientologist now and have not been for many years."
Coming from a Class XII, this is an almost unforgivable statement, and considered traitorous. Class XIIs are supposed to be fiercely loyal to Hubbard, and forever diligent in forwarding Scientology and protecting Hubbard's "Image," his "good name," etc.
David Mayo violated this rule and even ceased being a Scientologist.
That is regarded as a greater sin than "settling," especially when that "settling" occurred under extenuating circumstances, as do many "settlements" involving Scientology.
The "crime" is not "settling," but in having "besmirched the good name of L. Ron Hubbard," etc.
During the kerfuffle of some months ago, involving a Marty supporter [one of Marty's inner circle] and Class XII [Karen#1], who had airbrushed away some content of a posted David Mayo affidavit - content which put Hubbard in a negative light - there were a number of discussions.
During one discussion, Gerry Armstrong was described, by another Marty supporter, as a "scofflaw." Why a "Scofflaw"? Because Armstrong had broken his agreement with Scientology and continued to speak out about Scientology. And there have been other similar statements indicating that the entire "settlement" argument is a red herring. That's not what upsets the Hubbardites. What angers the Hubbardites are comments such as these...
From Russell Miller's 1986 interview of former Senior C/S International and Class XII, David Mayo:
"
He [L. Ron Hubbard]
could be capable of incredible cruelty... insatiable lust for power and money..." [Rest of excerpt snipped for brevity]
And from a 1991 article by David Mayo on 'Clear':
"
It was PR and marketing considerations that led Hubbard to decide that certain people were 'clear' at a certain point..."
Scientology has been passionately seeking to airbrush out of existence unwanted information on Hubbard, and Hubbard's Scientology, since before the Snow White Project. It MUST do so. The sense of frustration must be tremendous.
__________
Post B:
And this has been posted many times before, but it's very relevant to the over all situation, where "wogs" and even some EXes are being "persuaded." It also has a second part.
The outside the CoS Scientologists have finally found an effective "button" to "push," with which to apply the following "LRH datum." That button is the "Church" of Scientology as run by David Miscavige, with Miscavige presented as an "anti-Scientologist":
"The objective is to be identified as attackers of popularly considered evils [Miscavige, and 'Miscavology', i.e. 'perverted' or 'Reverse Scientology' or 'anti-Scientology']. This declassifies us from former labels. It reclassifies our attackers [or critics or opponents] as evil [or crazy, etc.] people."
[Convey the idea to "wogs" that "People atacking Scientology have something wrong with them," i.e. are crazy, etc., as Hubbard had instructed in his teachings in 1955 in the 'Manual on Dissemination', and had instructed in other places.]
Confidential 'Black Propaganda' 12 January 1972
Who are those "evil [crazy, 'have something wrong with them'] people."
One, according to J. Swift, is Gerry Armstrong.
[Note: J. Swift was once a critic of Scientology who, for unknown reasons, had become a passionate supporter of Marty&Mike&Friends, including Karen#1. He has since disappeared, and there is no desire to revisit any old arguments with this material, but it does seem to be relevant to the current situation, with regard to showing patterns.]
J. Swift noted, "
Unlike the scofflaw Gerry Armstrong, David Mayo signed a non-disclosure agreement and abides by the terms."
"Scofflaw"?
One wonders about the ultimate motive behind the game being played. As much as I dislike Miscavige, and as much as I appreciate Karen#1's contributing to the already decades-long exposure of Miscavige's abuses, I, for one, am not interested in being a manipulated or "played."
__________
Post C:
One last J. Swift quote, an excerpt:
"
Where Scientology is concerned, Mainstream Culture has swung to supporting the Independent practice of Scientology...
"
There are no mainstream journalists, academics, or popular authors who oppose Independent Scientology.
"
Those of us who support the Indies are growing in numbers."
This is where we are being led, and I am not interested in going there.
__________
Post D:
I'm not going to go into details, but I know of two recent events. One directly involved Gerry Armstrong, and the other (second event) followed the event involving Gerry Armstrong. This is vague, I know, but you'll just have to take my word for it.
The second event was the theft (of old Hubbard reel to reel lecture tapes, and other items, documents, etc.) from a person's place of business a few years ago.
Two well-dressed clean-cut large men entered under false pretenses, presenting themselves as old friends and asking to look around, the attendant/person/employee, not being aware of Scientology, saw them in their nice suits and pleasant demeanor, and mistakenly permitted them access. A short time later they were seen carrying boxes out a side door and quickly driving off.
They had been Scientology Private Investigators.
The other, also within the last few years, was where a person, while paying a social visit to Gerry Armstrong, was held at an airport (overseas) for many hours - as a "security risk," with all the unpleasantness that accompanies that - due to a mysterious phone call that identified this person as a terrorist or dangerous person. This occurred to the same person on whom the thefts were shortly thereafter committed, apparently in retaliation for the visit to Gerry Armstrong.
The events of post D occurred while Rinder was still in $cientology, and he would have had knowledge of them.
Thus, it appears that he is lying.
This has been a mish mosh of posts, I know, but I hope I hope it's understandable enough.
I really can't elaborate any further, and I definitely don't want to open old wounds with people such as the poster known as Karen#1 or even with J. Swift, but as major Marty&Mike allies, their comments are relevant.
And the last item will have to remain vague, but the events did occur, and it demonstrated - for me anyway - that, as of a few years ago (when Rinder was still inside the CofS) Gerry Armstrong was being watched, and at least one person visiting him was harassed as a result of that visit.