What's new

The Little Thread Which Grew - the Apollo '73 to Everything But

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: The old days - Aboard the Apollo - 1973

Great post Maria, I really like it, you make many excellent points. If you need to contact me right away, please email me.
Lakey

I can't find any of your contact info. When time permits and your box is clear, just send it all to me again!
 
Re: The old days - Aboard the Apollo - 1973

As followup to my last post, I mentioned the psychiatrist's assessment of Hubbard's mental health. One thing he suffered from was anhedonia.

"In psychology and psychiatry, anhedonia (/ˌænhiˈdniə/ AN-hee-DOH-nee-ə; Greek: ἀν- an-, "without" and ἡδονή hēdonē, "pleasure") is defined as the inability to experience pleasure from activities usually found enjoyable, e.g. exercise, hobbies, music, sexual activities or social interactions." - Wikipedia.

Just noting that the scientology staff 'bridge' completely removes all pleasurable and enjoyable activities from the 'schedule' as unnecessary, and, even detrimental to getting the stats up. LOL. One could say that Hubbard imposed his anhedonia onto all of his followers. Probably anyone on staff who does not suffer anhedonia must be seen as 'theetie wheetie.'
 
Re: The old days - Aboard the Apollo - 1973

As followup to my last post, I mentioned the psychiatrist's assessment of Hubbard's mental health. One thing he suffered from was anhedonia.

"In psychology and psychiatry, anhedonia (/ˌænhiˈdniə/ AN-hee-DOH-nee-ə; Greek: ἀν- an-, "without" and ἡδονή hēdonē, "pleasure") is defined as the inability to experience pleasure from activities usually found enjoyable, e.g. exercise, hobbies, music, sexual activities or social interactions." - Wikipedia.

Just noting that the scientology staff 'bridge' completely removes all pleasurable and enjoyable activities from the 'schedule' as unnecessary, and, even detrimental to getting the stats up. LOL. One could say that Hubbard imposed his anhedonia onto all of his followers. Probably anyone who does not suffer anhedonia on staff would be considered to be 'theetie wheetie.'

This post is really major and offers a clear path right to the heart of what is wrong with Hubbard's teachings. Those things which others cherish in life were developed traffic, Dev T to Hubbard. Sorry in using that Hubbard term but it really applies here.

I noticed right away when I first got in and heard a few of his tapes that some of youth of the day were really into nature and loved to watch the Sunsets and to watch butterflies and birds go about their business. Hubbard immediately shot back that the Sun was nothing but a series of nuclear explosions and watching the sunsets was a waste of time. With the butterflies, he stated that their lives were extremely short and that in their tiny life spans, the were always under attack by predators. He said something like, if you could watch a butterfly's entire life cycle, you would not see beauty but would see only a tortuous and early demise of the butterfly.

Obviously, Hubbard did not take delight in having and rearing children. He dumped Nibs and Katy when they were toddlers and denied that he was the father of his daughter with Sarah. He did seem to enjoy the 4 children which he had with Mary Sue while they were young. Perhaps, Mary Sue was able to do him some good in the early years of their marraige. As those children grew older, he seemed to loose interest in them.

His stats seemed to be his one driving passion and he demanded of the rest of us who signed on with him, to also make his stats the most important things in our lives.
Lakey
 
Re: The old days - Aboard the Apollo - 1973

Can anyone tell me how to delete some private messages for your private message area? I have 526 incoming messages and 474 sent messages. The only key I found was to delete everything and I don't want to do that. In years past, you could just left click on a message and delete it very easily but this no longer seems to be the case. Can someone please tell me how to delete individual private messages without clearing out the entire 1000 messages?
Lakey
 
Re: The old days - Aboard the Apollo - 1973

Can anyone tell me how to delete some private messages for your private message area? I have 526 incoming messages and 474 sent messages. The only key I found was to delete everything and I don't want to do that. In years past, you could just left click on a message and delete it very easily but this no longer seems to be the case. Can someone please tell me how to delete individual private messages without clearing out the entire 1000 messages?


Lakey

I think the system lets you check a box for the pm you want to delete. The box is to the far right of the message. There is a pull down menu at the bottom of all the displayed messages on a page. Choose delete and it will delete only that one selected message.
 
Re: The old days - Aboard the Apollo - 1973

This post is really major and offers a clear path right to the heart of what is wrong with Hubbard's teachings. Those things which others cherish in life were developed traffic, Dev T to Hubbard. Sorry in using that Hubbard term but it really applies here.

I noticed right away when I first got in and heard a few of his tapes that some of youth of the day were really into nature and loved to watch the Sunsets and to watch butterflies and birds go about their business. Hubbard immediately shot back that the Sun was nothing but a series of nuclear explosions and watching the sunsets was a waste of time. With the butterflies, he stated that their lives were extremely short and that in their tiny life spans, the were always under attack by predators. He said something like, if you could watch a butterfly's entire life cycle, you would not see beauty but would see only a tortuous and early demise of the butterfly.

Obviously, Hubbard did not take delight in having and rearing children. He dumped Nibs and Katy when they were toddlers and denied that he was the father of his daughter with Sarah. He did seem to enjoy the 4 children which he had with Mary Sue while they were young. Perhaps, Mary Sue was able to do him some good in the early years of their marraige. As those children grew older, he seemed to loose interest in them.

His stats seemed to be his one driving passion and he demanded of the rest of us who signed on with him, to also make his stats the most important things in our lives.
Lakey

and you were involved 32 or so years?

I was only in for about 5. I hope you are catching up on your butterflies!
 
Re: The old days - Aboard the Apollo - 1973

Can anyone tell me how to delete some private messages for your private message area? I have 526 incoming messages and 474 sent messages. The only key I found was to delete everything and I don't want to do that. In years past, you could just left click on a message and delete it very easily but this no longer seems to be the case. Can someone please tell me how to delete individual private messages without clearing out the entire 1000 messages?
Lakey

Also, you know that you can save all your pms to a file (either text or HTML) before clearing out the box?
 
Re: The old days - Aboard the Apollo - 1973

Also, you know that you can save all your pms to a file (either text or HTML) before clearing out the box?

Thanks Maria and Cat -
I deleted about 30 posts just now, so that will open up my mail box to receive new messages. I just resent my contact info to you Maria. Thank you both for such quick responses.

Yea Maria, 32 years and all those terrible experiences and I still was hanging on. Boy was I brainwashed. Even when I started on ESMB in February 2009, I still believed that LRH was extremely wise and that it was DM who had messed up CoS. It's not nice to brag Maria, it only took you 5 years to wise up while I took 32. Don't rub it in. Have pity on me.

I will say this in my defense. My style on the internet in general and ESMB in particular was to attempt to be fair minded. If I thought that LRH helped me in some way, I went out of my way to be fair and mention that. The same was also true when talking about individual staff members all the way from Yvonne Jentzsch, to Heber Jentzch to Hector Carmona to Bob Mithoff. I always saluted those who I thought had some good traits. Doing that tends to build credibility among a certain type of reader which Carmelo and I both wanted to attract!

Doing that may have something to do with the success I achieved with this thread. Hooking up with Carmelo is the biggest reason the thread has been successful but in all fairness to myself, Roger, Ted, Purple Haze and Vinaire all posted here before Carmelo came along and in Carmelo's perceptive eyes, he saw me as a writer who he would like to team up with. Thus I am willing to give myself a lot of the credit for the success of the thread.
Lakey
 
Re: The old days - Aboard the Apollo - 1973

Originally posted by lkwdblds

Unfortunately. a man named Neville Chamberlin, once held such notions and sat at the peace table with Hitler in 1938. The result was that the Czech Republic ended up being dismantled and Hitler became emboldened to take over even more territory, including half of Poland In the 76 years since that time, all world leaders had come to see that appeasement does not work. Now with President Obama in power, he is the first world leader in 76 years who is not willing to learn that you "can't do business with Hitler". He says that if something hasn't worked in the last 50-60 years it is logical to try a new approach. Well, that sounds wise and it can be but with one proviso, a leader must not just try a new approach, he must try a new approach which is BETTER!! In actual fact, Obama is trying a 76 years old approach which has failed every time it has been tried in the past and which is MUCH WORSE than the status quo approach!!.

:unsure:

I am currently sitting here watching the History Channel. The episode entitled The World Wars is on. Of course, the first half is on Adolf Hitler's viewpoint. Now it's on to Stalin temporarily. If there weren't movie cameras back then, it would all be too incredible to believe and we'd be claiming 90 percent of this story was propaganda and open to interpretation...rather than just the 50 percent. :coolwink:

You are right about us pussyfootin around with ISIS. We don't seem to WANT to SOLVE the problem!. I liken it to gathering up your family's funds to spring for a new air conditioner but having your kids refuse to shut the door because they'd rather the dog let himself out so they don't have to.

I am struck just now by seeing how Churchill embarrasses and provokes Chamberlin to ACT. Someone should address our Congress with such insults.

"Our ruling class takes its weekends in the country. Hitler takes countries, on the weekends!

..............

Is it all about ruling classes and race? Where does the middle class worker fit in any more amidst all these fav dramatizations being acted out. Maybe there's just not enough fire in the gut here yet. That's one thing Hitler had. And that fire was contagious. I think Marco Rubio can ignite that fire...but, sadly, he won't represent the American middle class...just a nouveau...becoming middle class.
We can't use solutions like privatizing Social Security or health savings accounts because, like Derrek Bell, suggests and Obama knows, that would serve only the white race.
http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/john-perazzo/barack-obamas-first-jeremiah-wright/I think it would also reveal though, the statistics showing who the real users of tax dollars are, and how much on an annual basis.


https://youtu.be/VJSR1SM-gnw

https://youtu.be/9MKw_KHhn38
 
Last edited:
Re: The old days - Aboard the Apollo - 1973

:unsure:

I am currently sitting here watching the History Channel. The episode entitled The World Wars is on. Of course, the first half is on Adolf Hitler's viewpoint. Now it's on to Stalin temporarily. If there weren't movie cameras back then, it would all be too incredible to believe and we'd be claiming 90 percent of this story was propaganda and open to interpretation...rather than just the 50 percent. :coolwink:

You are right about us pussyfootin around with ISIS. We don't seem to WANT to SOLVE the problem!. I liken it to gathering up your family's funds to spring for a new air conditioner but having your kids refuse to shut the door because they'd rather the dog let himself out so they don't have to.

I am struck just now by seeing how Churchill embarrasses and provokes Chamberlin to ACT. Someone should address our Congress with such insults.

"Our ruling class takes its weekends in the country. Hitler takes countries, on the weekends!

..............

Is it all about ruling classes and race? Where does the middle class worker fit in any more amidst all these fav dramatizations being acted out. Maybe there's just not enough fire in the gut here yet. That's one thing Hitler had. And that fire was contagious. I think Marco Rubio can ignite that fire...but, sadly, he won't represent the American middle class...just a nouveau...becoming middle class.
We can't use solutions like privatizing Social Security or health savings accounts because, like Derrek Bell, suggests and Obama knows, that would serve only the white race.
http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/john-perazzo/barack-obamas-first-jeremiah-wright/I think it would also reveal though, the statistics showing who the real users of tax dollars are, and how much on an annual basis.


https://youtu.be/VJSR1SM-gnw

https://youtu.be/9MKw_KHhn38

I don't vote and try not to remember who the candidates are.
 
Re: The old days - Aboard the Apollo - 1973

i guess this is me...while I check the news briefly each day I often just view headlines and move on....as if I am scanning to see if there is
anything at all different from the same old same old...but usually it is more of the same.....so I don't click. Up to now I have voted. But I decided after the last election I was
going to drop out. I was ready to just view the whole election process as a good cop bad cop setup and walk away. This New Yorker article sums it up well.
http://www.newyorker.com/humor/borowitz-report/country-wrong-track-say-people-vote - Country on Wrong Track, Say People Who Did Not Vote
 
Re: The old days - Aboard the Apollo - 1973

If anyone enjoys the 30s and 40s in California, which I know Lakey and Hats do, then Mildred Pierce is a great miniseries/TV program. I found it a few days ago and just finished part 3 yesterday.
It's called Mildred Pierce and it's from HBO. Yes there is also the Joan Crawford film and the book.... the miniseries stars Kate Winslet and in the second segment there were some very racy scenes :). I don't know if these involved a body double or not. I'm not recommending it for that reason, although it was a bit surprising for a miniseries.

I'm really enjoying it. I've reaffirmed in watching it that progress is a lie. It's all relative if it is better to be young now or young then. Each generation has its charm and its pitfalls.
I was a child in the 60s and 70s but due to how I was raised it may as well have been the 50s at our house.
 
Re: The old days - Aboard the Apollo - 1973

If anyone enjoys the 30s and 40s in California, which I know Lakey and Hats do, then Mildred Pierce is a great miniseries/TV program. I found it a few days ago and just finished part 3 yesterday.
It's called Mildred Pierce and it's from HBO. Yes there is also the Joan Crawford film and the book.... the miniseries stars Kate Winslet and in the second segment there were some very racy scenes :). I don't know if these involved a body double or not. I'm not recommending it for that reason, although it was a bit surprising for a miniseries.

I'm really enjoying it. I've reaffirmed in watching it that progress is a lie. It's all relative if it is better to be young now or young then. Each generation has its charm and its pitfalls.
I was a child in the 60s and 70s but due to how I was raised it may as well have been the 50s at our house.

"To be or not to be". How about: "To be a kid then or to be a kid now, that is the question."

The inventions and hi tech items favor today's kids. Playing out doors and having to be more creative in dreaming up what to play, favor the older times. In that regard I agree that each generation has its charm and its pitfalls.

There is one area however, where I think that the past generations have an advantage over today's generation. What I am about to say will probably cause many to see me as a prude or a prig or someone hopelessly out of date but I believe strongly in what I'm about to say so goes:

Life in the 40 and 50's was much simpler as regards who we were and what our beliefs were. Starting around 1964 that started to change, things got a little more complex but still through the 60's, 70's and 80's there were strong ties to the society of the 50's. A change started in the 90's and in this decade it has matured, at least in our Blue States. Some of the Red States are hold outs, leaning somewhat more to traditional values.

SIMPLICITIES OF LIFE
We were the USA, we were the good guys. Our founders were brilliant and came up with some timeless documents which we lived by. Yes, our founders were White men, yes, of course, they were old when they did their greatest work. Still, these men were revered as giants.

Boys were boys and would grow to be men, Girls were girls and would grow to be women. Each person knew which gender they were and were proud of their gender. The genders were considered to be equal when all was said and done. Usually, the men went to work while the women stayed home to raise the family. Of course, there were exceptions to this rule but such exceptions were rare. When they occurred, it was usually not a big deal.

Most people went to church and were believing Christians. In New York, Chicago, L.A. as well as in Florida and various other bastions on the east coast and in Ohio, there was a thriving Jewish community, which was usually but not always wealthier than other communities. The Jews, as has been their wont historically, had a disproportionately larger effect on the national scene than did other groups. With about 3.5% of the population, they controlled maybe 15% of the wealth. Other religions were allowed to practice as well and did so with no problems.

The one major stain on all these nostalgic trappings was in how we treated people of color. Black people were subservient. The way they were treated depended somewhat on what area of the country they were living in. In the South, they lived the worst. Maybe in New England or New York, they did better but nowhere were they on an equal standing with White people.

Latinos were treated better than blacks but they too were discriminated against. Orientals were different but they were discriminated against as regards housing but they were able to advance their own cause by themselves through education, work performance, a live and let live approach to life and cleanliness. Somewhere along the line White's saw that when Oriental's moved into their neighborhoods, the values did not go down, in fact the values either stayed the same or went up.

COMPLEXITIES
Today's USA is more "Progressive", we are more inclusive and now, being a White Male is no longer a badge of honor. In fact, White Males, especially older ones or deceased ones are being written out of our history books. Some religions regard White Males as descendants of the devil.

Boys are not boys anymore and girls are not girls. In some insane and destructive mania, many of our kids are being taught that men and women are the same except for their genitalia. Basically what is being sought after is total equality for everything, racial, which is valid, but also gender equality, equal pay for all, everything and everyone must be regarded as equal.

Being a Christian is now not fully acceptable but somehow, being a Muslim is much more acceptable. Being a Jew. no that is no good anymore as anti-semitism is once again rearing its ugly head as it has done for the last 2000 years.

Being American is no good anymore. Showing allegiance to any country's flag is now considered passe. We are all citizens of the World, the physical planet, Earth, is what we all owe allegiance to, Earth and it's precious environmental treasures. Our governments will pool together as a world government, make sure we are all equals and guide our quest to put environmental needs above human needs.

So, in closing, today's children have to grow up in this Progressive environment. Big Government wants to take over the schooling of our children, starting with preschool and going all the way through community college. A child's parents are now just caretakers for only the pre-preschool years, then the wisdom of the government will take over and brainwash, er I mean educate, the children with proper values.

All things being equal, being raised in any previous generation had both advantages and disadvantages. It was a toss up as to which was best, they were both equally good.

However, nowadays, things are no longer equal, big government is moving in to replace the parents, redistribute the wealth and forward an era of equality where White men are disempowered at the expense of more power for all races, and all genders. The USA will be reduced in scope, military might financial clout and cultural influence while world bodies will govern our Planet.

Because of all the above, I believe that it was far better to be a kid growing up in the 40's, 50's, 60's, 70's and 80's than it is now. Kids of any of those generations had freedom to be kids and discover what they, as individuals, wanted to do in life. For kids being raised at this time, that is no longer fully the case.
Lakey
 
Last edited:
Re: The old days - Aboard the Apollo - 1973

I remember being 4 and walking all around the neighborhood without adult supervision. Glad I got to do that. Each generation thinks the world came to an end after them. Of course we all know that is not true!

The world ended in the 18th Century.:biggrin:
 
Re: The old days - Aboard the Apollo - 1973

I remember being 4 and walking all around the neighborhood without adult supervision. Glad I got to do that. Each generation thinks the world came to an end after them. Of course we all know that is not true!

The world ended in the 18th Century.:biggrin:

Hi Maria, it looks like you are up to your old tricks from age 4, walking all around ESMB and the Apollo thread in the wee hours of the night without adult supervision. :biggrin:

Why do you say the world ended in the 18th Century. I know its a joke but I can't figure out the humor. I remember asking my cousin Marty which period in history he would choose to live in if he had access to a time machine. His answer was that he wasn't sure what period he would choose except that it would have to be a period after indoor plumbing became available. That made sense to me and was also funny. Seriously, though, the 18th century ended about 100 years before running water in the houses and indoor plumbing started becoming a reality.

I believe that a British guy, Sir Thomas Crapper, had something to do with that achievement.
Lakey
 
The latest from Mama

Mama had sent an amazing little post a couple of days ago. Here it is:

Today is a special anniversary.

It was April 18, 1950 that
Vin Scully made his first Dodger broadcast.

Rumor has it that in 20 or 30 years, he is going to cut back.

Sent from my iPhone


Vin Scully is the baseball broadcaster for the L.A. Dodgers baseball team. Way back in time, half way to the covered wagon days, the great Vin Scully broadcast his first Dodgers baseball game. At that time, the Dodgers were the Brooklyn Dodgers, they didn't move to L.A. until 1958.

Vinnie is perhaps the greatest sports announcer of all time. Of course his amazing longevity is unmatched but his call of a baseball game may be the best of all time. Vinnie is a natural communicator. There is a lot of dead time in a baseball game, but Vinnie fills it with fantastic anecdotes and he comes across as being an old friend, almost the same as being family. The man's voice quality and timbre is remarkable and though he is a living legend, he comes across as just one of the guys, sort of an old family friend who dropped in for a visit. The guy is just amazing.

The only other sports announcer who comes even close to him would be Chick Hearn who did college basketball games for USC starting around 1960. When the Lakers moved to L.A. from Minneapolis, Chick took over the job of being the Laker's announcer and he kept that job all the way until his death in 2002. In his 42 year stint as the Laker's broadcaster, he only missed 2 games. I believe one miss was that he missed his train because of a traffic jam and if memory serves me correctly, the other time he had a short case of laryngitis. After those two misses, he did over 3,000 games in a row without missing a game.

Chick, is known for developing a lot of basketball jargon. The phrase "Slam Dunk" was coined by Chick. Another term is "Garbage Time", this refers to a game if it is a rout and it is obvious that one time is going to win. At that point, the coaches usually take out all the star players and bring in young players off of their bench to finish off the game. Chick uses this term in his interview beelow. He coined dozens of other phrases of basketball jargon.

Here is a short video clip of Vin Scully, now age 87!: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9r7sw-KOH7g

God, that man is a class act!!! As successful as he is and as long as he has been announcing, he is still excited about every game and the crowd still spurs him on. He is family!

Here is a historic clip of Chick Hearn interviewing the 18 year old Kobe Bryant after his first game as a Laker. This season was Kobe's 19th year as a Laker :

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5QYeuYcJdfo

Lakey
 
Last edited:
Re: The latest from Mama

Mama had sent an amazing little post a couple of days ago. Here it is:

<snip>

One question that's been bothering me for quite a while:

Who/what the fuck is "Mama" and why can't s/he/it/they/ post under their own identity(s)?

Jus' askin'
 
Re: The latest from Mama

One question that's been bothering me for quite a while:

Who/what the fuck is "Mama" and why can't s/he/it/they/ post under their own identity(s)?

Jus' askin'

I wish that I could answer you but Mama wants to remain anonymous for personal reasons.
Lakey
 
Re: The old days - Aboard the Apollo - 1973

Hi Maria, it looks like you are up to your old tricks from age 4, walking all around ESMB and the Apollo thread in the wee hours of the night without adult supervision. :biggrin:

Why do you say the world ended in the 18th Century. I know its a joke but I can't figure out the humor. I remember asking my cousin Marty which period in history he would choose to live in if he had access to a time machine. His answer was that he wasn't sure what period he would choose except that it would have to be a period after indoor plumbing became available. That made sense to me and was also funny. Seriously, though, the 18th century ended about 100 years before running water in the houses and indoor plumbing started becoming a reality.

I believe that a British guy, Sir Thomas Crapper, had something to do with that achievement.
Lakey

I guess I gave no clues for my 18th C puzzle.

I was watching Ford Madox Ford's Parade's End, which centers on a man who remains faithful to his wandering flirting wife during WWI. Here is a bit of a background from Wikipedia.

....
Plot
The novels chronicle the life of Christopher Tietjens, "the last Tory", a brilliant government statistician from a wealthy landowning family who is serving in the British Army during the First World War. His wife Sylvia is a flippant socialite who seems intent on ruining him. Tietjens may or may not be the father of his wife's child. Meanwhile, his incipient affair with Valentine Wannop, a high-spirited pacifist and suffragette, has not been consummated, despite what all their friends believe. The two central novels follow Tietjens in the army in France and Belgium, as well as Sylvia and Valentine in their separate paths over the course of the war.

Literary notes
Notably among war novels, Tietjens' consciousness takes primacy over the war-events it filters. Ford constructs a protagonist for whom the war is but one layer of his life, and not always even the most prominent though he is in the middle of it. In a narrative beginning before the war and ending after the armistice, Ford's project is to situate an unimaginable cataclysm within a social, moral and psychological complexity. Robie Macauley wrote that "the Tietjens story...is less about the incident of a single war than about a whole era" and its destruction. "Ford took as the scheme for his allegory the life of one man, Christopher Tietjens, a member of an extinct species, which, as he says, 'died out sometime in the Eighteenth century.'Representing in himself the order and stability of another age, he must experience the disruptive present."[SUP][9][/SUP]

The work is also striking in its investigation of the relationship between gender dynamics, war, and societal upheaval. Scholar David Ayers notes that "Parade's End is virtually alone of the male writing of the 1920s in affirming the ascendance of women and advocating a course of graceful withdrawal from dominance for men".[SUP][10][/SUP]
.....

The miniseries is quite good, and Tietjens is an amazing character, very compelling. Didn't hurt that Cumberbatch played that part either.
My comment was a take off of the line in the program, which was an allegory for how people view their era as pivotal or more significant than subsequent generations or who sentimentalize the events of their own era that is now past, an extinct species, I highlighted the lines from the wiki quote about Tietjens who serves as the model for the extinct species that died out in the 18th C.He is a rare individual whose values and way of viewing life is dated and this gives him a sort of extreme value within the world he lives in now (during WWI). Being a child that at 4 wandered the suburbs of America without a chaperone, I too was an extinct species insofar as today's child while willing may never get that chance given that the parent will find themselves facing the policeman's notepad and worse. And if the child is in the SO, forget it. (Although I would not put it past a child to escape from a heavily guarded building!)

I wrote, enough to produce chuckles but a bit too obscurely, that each generation thinks the world came to an end after theirs. On that theory, the world has been coming to an and for centuries and I just chose the 18th because I liked that line from the TV series and I had just seen that episode a few minutes before I posted. Just another way of saying that by gone times have gone poof!

:pixiedust:
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top