lkwdblds
Crusader
Re: The old days - Aboard the Apollo - 1973
Fine, thank you for your opinion, it is obvious that you feel very strongly about this matter. People reading your post will take into account the passion with which you present your views!!!
I am the moderator of the thread having written its first post. As moderator, I know of several people whom I respect who hold a view different from yours. Two such people who are my friends are Purple Haze and CO2. Purple can deliver CoS tech as well as other forms of tech, including social worker's tech. I have never had a session from CO2 but I know that he is capable of talking to people over the phone and somehow producing major changes for the better in them. Phil Spickler may likely think highly of some portions of tech and then there are two veteran posters here, Leon and Terril who tend to support tech going on in the field. As moderator, I am striving for a forum where differing views are allowed the right of presenting their case. I often disagree with one side at the expense of the other side but even so both sides have the right to be heard. If we don't do that, then we are no better than all the hate mongers on so many of the bash type threads on ESMB! I really want to uphold a forum which allows conflicting viewpoints to compete on an equal basis. The strength of one side's logical arguments over the other side must decide the issues otherwise why even bother to waste one's time developing a forum?
Your step 1 starts off nicely, some may be strong enough to pull it off while others may not. If not, you advise them to seek out exes here who can possibly help in some way with what ails. That is exactly what I am recommending as well. In your next sentence you mention that you are down on the tech and then you give them advice on how to play out being down on the tech . IMO, I believe that somewhere in this portion of your advice you begin to take control of the persons power of choice and eliminate them from considering opinions that do not agree with yours. You then tell then to talk to exes who care, like on this thread which is then Step 2 and you assure them that here on this thread we won't attack you, no matter what you believe.
The overall plan is good but I see an inconsistency. I believe that it is not possible for you to assure them that they won't be attacked here on this thread until AFTER they talk to people who are not down on the tech; in other words if they never talk to such people. you cannot make that guarantee.
I think your recommendations should be rephrased as follow: "A person leaving cos should free their mind of all concepts or beliefs of cos or scn, if they can and to the degree possible. After that then there are those here who can possibly help, in some way, with what ails. I am down on the tech and I believe that it is correct for new departures to be down on it too. If you don't agree with me, go talk to some others who are not down on the tech first then go on to the next step. If you do agree with me then go immediately onto the next step which is - go sailing, walk in the woods, play with your dog. That is step 1. I believe that Nature is more fun than any tech. Next, talk to exes who care, like exes on this thread who you have not yet talked to. - that is then Step 2. Here on this thread we won't attack you, no matter what you believe. Having talked to me, one who is down on the tech and having had the opportunity to talk to others who are not down on the tech, I recommend to you that you continue on with my step 2. If for some reason you still wish to pursue the tech, I highly advise against that and I ask you to do my step 2 first but if you insist on continuing with the tech pick the person whom you feel most comfortable with and start working with them on the tech. I wish you luck but if anything goes wrong, then come back and see me and I will help you to get going on step 2."[/QUOTE]
If you did this, essentially at least allowing them the opportunity of talking to a Terril or a Leon first, then I think that your method would be perfect. Whether a person went your way or went with Terril or Leon would depend mainly on your persuasiveness and skill in presenting your arguments against the tech vis a vis their arguments for the tech. I believe that this one step is vital and must not be strong armed out of existence, which it seems to me is what your original method, without my modification, would do.
Lakey
Here you go. I don't care if I am accused of being a guru. I am not. Anyone just go to town! But I won't fkning apologize for having brain cells. Before trying to focus on real wins in existence, a person leaving cos should free their mind of all concepts or beliefs of cos or scn, if they can and to the degree possible. After that then there are those here who can possibly help, in some way, with what ails. I am down on the tech and it is healthy for new departures to do that too - go sailing, walk in the woods, play with your dog. That is step 1. Nature is more fun than any tech. Talk to exes who care, like on this thread is then Step 2. Here on this thread we won't attack you, no matter what you believe.
Fine, thank you for your opinion, it is obvious that you feel very strongly about this matter. People reading your post will take into account the passion with which you present your views!!!
I am the moderator of the thread having written its first post. As moderator, I know of several people whom I respect who hold a view different from yours. Two such people who are my friends are Purple Haze and CO2. Purple can deliver CoS tech as well as other forms of tech, including social worker's tech. I have never had a session from CO2 but I know that he is capable of talking to people over the phone and somehow producing major changes for the better in them. Phil Spickler may likely think highly of some portions of tech and then there are two veteran posters here, Leon and Terril who tend to support tech going on in the field. As moderator, I am striving for a forum where differing views are allowed the right of presenting their case. I often disagree with one side at the expense of the other side but even so both sides have the right to be heard. If we don't do that, then we are no better than all the hate mongers on so many of the bash type threads on ESMB! I really want to uphold a forum which allows conflicting viewpoints to compete on an equal basis. The strength of one side's logical arguments over the other side must decide the issues otherwise why even bother to waste one's time developing a forum?
Your step 1 starts off nicely, some may be strong enough to pull it off while others may not. If not, you advise them to seek out exes here who can possibly help in some way with what ails. That is exactly what I am recommending as well. In your next sentence you mention that you are down on the tech and then you give them advice on how to play out being down on the tech . IMO, I believe that somewhere in this portion of your advice you begin to take control of the persons power of choice and eliminate them from considering opinions that do not agree with yours. You then tell then to talk to exes who care, like on this thread which is then Step 2 and you assure them that here on this thread we won't attack you, no matter what you believe.
The overall plan is good but I see an inconsistency. I believe that it is not possible for you to assure them that they won't be attacked here on this thread until AFTER they talk to people who are not down on the tech; in other words if they never talk to such people. you cannot make that guarantee.
I think your recommendations should be rephrased as follow: "A person leaving cos should free their mind of all concepts or beliefs of cos or scn, if they can and to the degree possible. After that then there are those here who can possibly help, in some way, with what ails. I am down on the tech and I believe that it is correct for new departures to be down on it too. If you don't agree with me, go talk to some others who are not down on the tech first then go on to the next step. If you do agree with me then go immediately onto the next step which is - go sailing, walk in the woods, play with your dog. That is step 1. I believe that Nature is more fun than any tech. Next, talk to exes who care, like exes on this thread who you have not yet talked to. - that is then Step 2. Here on this thread we won't attack you, no matter what you believe. Having talked to me, one who is down on the tech and having had the opportunity to talk to others who are not down on the tech, I recommend to you that you continue on with my step 2. If for some reason you still wish to pursue the tech, I highly advise against that and I ask you to do my step 2 first but if you insist on continuing with the tech pick the person whom you feel most comfortable with and start working with them on the tech. I wish you luck but if anything goes wrong, then come back and see me and I will help you to get going on step 2."[/QUOTE]
If you did this, essentially at least allowing them the opportunity of talking to a Terril or a Leon first, then I think that your method would be perfect. Whether a person went your way or went with Terril or Leon would depend mainly on your persuasiveness and skill in presenting your arguments against the tech vis a vis their arguments for the tech. I believe that this one step is vital and must not be strong armed out of existence, which it seems to me is what your original method, without my modification, would do.
Lakey


