lkwdblds
Crusader
Re: The old days - Aboard the Apollo - 1973
Very interesting! I give her an "A" for originality and an "A" for voice and delivery but the thing is that it is no longer the same song nor the same genre. There is a place for a version like this. It sort of reminds me of a heavy metal band singing the Star Spangled Banner at a football game.
Garland's version was created for a 1939 children's movie. She did such a good job singing it, that her rendition has become a classic. There's probably no way to outdo Judy Garland's performance because her performance is so classic that it defines the entire genre!
IMHO other more modern versions are fine. They express a timeless classic in today's musical language. This type of musical effort is good and who knows, it might introduce the song to millenials who might just yawn at the 1939 version and say, "boring".
I reminds me of "A Fifth of Beethoven" written in the disco era being compared to Beethoven's Fifth Symphony. No matter what the disco era people wrote, it can never be a greater piece of music than Beethhoven's 5th Symphony because the original piece written in the early 1800's defines a certain genre of music of that era. Still, it was good that "A Fifth of Beethoven was written"
Efforts to compare two musical genres, one from the distant past and the other from today are very interesting but almost by definition, the newer piece cannot be the better of the two.
A copy of the Hope diamond can never be greater or more beautiful the the original Hope diamond. That is what I'm saying.
BTW, for those of you who have never heard it or have heard of it but forgot that it exits, here is "A fifth of Beethoven". Very clever as a disco piece but hardly in the class of the original!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x9Tr0rhT49k
Lakey
Maria, please listen to this and then tell me if you still think Garland's version is 'unbeatable'.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2rd8VktT8xY&index=1&list=RD2rd8VktT8xY
No contest IMO.
Dammit! Now where's that box of Kleenex?
Very interesting! I give her an "A" for originality and an "A" for voice and delivery but the thing is that it is no longer the same song nor the same genre. There is a place for a version like this. It sort of reminds me of a heavy metal band singing the Star Spangled Banner at a football game.
Garland's version was created for a 1939 children's movie. She did such a good job singing it, that her rendition has become a classic. There's probably no way to outdo Judy Garland's performance because her performance is so classic that it defines the entire genre!
IMHO other more modern versions are fine. They express a timeless classic in today's musical language. This type of musical effort is good and who knows, it might introduce the song to millenials who might just yawn at the 1939 version and say, "boring".
I reminds me of "A Fifth of Beethoven" written in the disco era being compared to Beethoven's Fifth Symphony. No matter what the disco era people wrote, it can never be a greater piece of music than Beethhoven's 5th Symphony because the original piece written in the early 1800's defines a certain genre of music of that era. Still, it was good that "A Fifth of Beethoven was written"
Efforts to compare two musical genres, one from the distant past and the other from today are very interesting but almost by definition, the newer piece cannot be the better of the two.
A copy of the Hope diamond can never be greater or more beautiful the the original Hope diamond. That is what I'm saying.
BTW, for those of you who have never heard it or have heard of it but forgot that it exits, here is "A fifth of Beethoven". Very clever as a disco piece but hardly in the class of the original!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x9Tr0rhT49k
Lakey

So many songs, so many memories...




