What's new

The Little Thread Which Grew - the Apollo '73 to Everything But

Status
Not open for further replies.
I have been thinking lately about how my exit from scientology did not leave me with any doubts that it was the right thing to do, absolutely. Different from many here on the board, I didn't suffer any depression, confusion etc. I was totally jubilant, happy, joyful, FREE!:happydance::happydance:

Some reasons I've come up with are: My first and second D were always more important than the 3rd or 4th. I really had no concept of the possibility or even desire to 'clear the planet'. Yes, helping people was satisfying, but not numero uno in my universe. I did want my group of fellow SO members at Saint Hill to do well, be happy, healthy, achieving their goals, both personal and group. That was not happening on a tragic scale. I do at times feel that I must have been a selfish bitch to not have that altruistic impetus that so many of you had. Yet, it may have saved my bacon. ie, When I could see that my 1st and 2nd D were being severely oppressed, I got out. So, I was only in for 5 or 6 years, prob not long enough to get the whole brainwashing deal. Did get some, but even at its height, it did not entirely eradicate my native knowingness.:p

Another thought: Aaron has brought to our attention that love is seldom if ever mentioned in scientology. I could be wrong but I don't think happiness or joy feature large either. The Way to Happiness?? Is it really about what we experience when we are truly happy?:nervous:I don't know actually, cos I haven't read it for donkey's years.

I was "in" for 8.

A disk jockey, I listened to, once said, "Goodness, untempered by tough tough intelligence, solves very few human problems."

My 2D was great, when I left. My having done through OT3 (see my comments on CLEARBIRD thread) and the briefing course, and started a successful center (before missions), allowed me to move on with no looking back.

I had done drugs before Sci. I didn't need to go back. I moved forward with my life, did the kid and family thing. Took the kids rock climbing, skiing, surfing, scuba, and to work. Just basically what my parents did for / with me.

When I left, I was on top of the world. I had no fear or threat from the Co$, because there was nothing I wanted from them. It feels good to not be intimidated by petty bureaucratic bullies.

Life is a game, play it!
 

Ted

Gold Meritorious Patron
Quotable Quote

I was "in" for 8.

A disk jockey, I listened to, once said, "Goodness, untempered by tough tough intelligence, solves very few human problems."

My 2D was great, when I left. My having done through OT3 (see my comments on CLEARBIRD thread) and the briefing course, and started a successful center (before missions), allowed me to move on with no looking back.

I had done drugs before Sci. I didn't need to go back. I moved forward with my life, did the kid and family thing. Took the kids rock climbing, skiing, surfing, scuba, and to work. Just basically what my parents did for / with me.

When I left, I was on top of the world. I had no fear or threat from the Co$, because there was nothing I wanted from them. It feels good to not be intimidated by petty bureaucratic bullies.

Life is a game, play it!


The "key," above in red, unlocks the door. It swings in one direction: OUT!
 

thetanic

Gold Meritorious Patron
Poor Brittany Murphy, only 32. That's awfully young to be shuffling off this mortal coil. Massive cardiac arrest at the very young age of 32 usually means congenital heart problems, drug abuse, or severe eating disorder... whichever way, an unfortunate death anyway you look at it.

Probably as common after drugs is heart damage from coxsackie virus. It's not common, but it generally kills within a few years after the infection. I have a friend who had heart damage from it but lived long enough to receive a transplant. I also had two other friends die from it. All three were between 25 and 35.
 

Terril park

Sponsor
Lovely!

In my humble estimation, it takes the third dynamic to run out its third dynamic case, as, per the above post, you are accomplishing here. In order to do this successfully, the integrity needs to exist enough to clearly view the case and see it as it is. Of course, reality may appear different from each viewpoint, which is why you need all points of view on the third dynamic group to run the stuff out.

This is why the C of Scn in its present unethical state [condition of existence] is obviously unable to as is anything. As a third dynamic group, it is very busy creating complexities, not ising its case, blaming it on everyone else, following a firm policy of disconnection [do you realize how far down on the awareness scale that is?] as a means to 'handle' uncomfortable situations, rather than seeing something as it really is and helping resolve conflicts. Instead, its products are conflict and lies, with the right hand unable to see what the left hand is doing nor taking any responsibility for what goes on beyond the public view.

Any comment is welcome.:coolwink:

Ho Ho Ho :)

All the spoken comm we've had seems like you're some " Dumb Blonde
class VIII". I know thats not a full reality, by a very loong shot. And its
somewhat exhilerating. And loads of fun!

When you write? Jeez! The Rabbi's, those involved with "Magick" , the severe standard techies, the varied philosophers, any other philosophical orders should take note.

Anyone involved should be so lucky.

I am. :)
 
Is that a double entendre?

I think I am getting excited! :biglove:

No I only wanted to mention to the Co$ fair game committee that seems to be getting their hands dirtier by new dirty tricks in the southland. The standard stuff they have done before: killing pets, moving stuff inside your house when you're not home, stealing mail. Just the standard actions to intimidate.

I just wanted to let them know that I do own a hand gun (or two), and I've been a pretty good shot since I was 9 or 10. I've been shooting longer than that. If I was to find an intruder, I'd have no qualms in pulling a trigger.
 
Ho Ho Ho :)

All the spoken comm we've had seems like you're some " Dumb Blonde
class VIII". I know thats not a full reality, by a very loong shot. And its
somewhat exhilerating. And loads of fun!

When you write? Jeez! The Rabbi's, those involved with "Magick" , the severe standard techies, the varied philosophers, any other philosophical orders should take note.

Anyone involved should be so lucky.

I am. :)

Bring it on purple haze
 
Last edited:

lkwdblds

Crusader
THE STORY OF CELEBRITY CENTER'S FOUNDING!!

NEVER BEFORE TOLD STORY!

EXCLUSIVE THE STORY OF CELEBRITY CENTER'S FOUNDING


NOW TOLD FOR THE FIRST TIME ON THE INTERNET OR IN PRINT As Promised by Lakey 3 weeks ago, his vast world wide research department has unearthed the exciting story of how Cebebrity Center came to be!! Now for the first time anywhere I encourage you to make a cup of java or a pot of tea and prepare to read a previously untold story. HERE IT IS, THE STORY OF THE DECADE: SIT DOWN AND ENJOY!

RETURN WITH US TO THOSE THRILLING DAYS OF YESTERYEAR WHEN OUT OF THE PAST AND INTO YOUR HOME, (OFFICE OR LOCAL STARBUCKS) COME THE THUNDERING DEEDS OF THE GREAT S.O. MEMBER YVONNE AND HER LOYAL SIDEKICK "MYSTERY CRACKERJACK AUDITOR" The Year is 1969. the place Los Angeles, California, USA: After a brief message from out sponsor the story begins......Eat Wheaties, the Breakfast of Chanpions the favorite breakfast food of 3 out of 4 U.S. Olympic Medal Winners...and now on to our exciting story.

CHAPTER ONE
In late 1968 and on into 1969, Yvonne Jentzsch was the Commanding Officer of the new advanced Org in Los Angeles. She had been sent to Los Angeles as part of a mission from Flag, then onboard the Apollo, to establish the new Advanced Org for North America in L.A. Prior to leaving for Los Angeles, an innocent event took place on the Apollo, an event that would forever change the history of Scientology. Yvonne attended a briefing by LRH given to senior Apollo management about Scientology's need to have a Celebrity Centre, a place for Opinion Leaders to congregate and receive Scientology Services, benefit from them and spread the word to the vast numbers of the publics who looked to their opinion leaders for guidance on how to live and enrich their lives. LRH described in general terms what such a Celebrity Centre should consist of and who would be elegible to join. Though general in overall nature, LRH probably got a little specific on a few points. We can only guess that the LRH talk struck some kind of nerve in Yvonne's psyche, rattled some basic purpose deep within her or rekindled some long held goal of hers. The LRH talk to Executives ended and for awhile, it produced no effects....but only for awhile. Yvonne left on her mission to be the Commanding Officer of the Advanced Org in L.A. My research department has uncovered an interesting fact that Yvonne put early AOLA staff on 24hour/ day service. I was told by a guy on the Excalibur training ship in 1971 who was CC staff and had formerly been AOLA staff that the early AOLA was generating an income of $100,000 per week. When you think that the 1969 dollar was worth $5 in today's money, that is a hefty Gross Income (GI) for an Org of that time but the story, though hearsay, is likely true because L.A.was the only place in the Western Hemisphere where advanced Scientology Services could be attained. Prior to its opening, the only place delivering the services was Saint Hill.

Sometime in 1969, Hanna Eltringham came to Los Angeles to relieve Yvonne of her very successful mission and Hanna took over Yvonne's duties. We know that while C.O. of L.A., Yvonne had set up a filing cabinet having to do with the start up of Celebrity Centre. What was in the filing cabinet, I do not know yet but when my story is released today, I believe that point will be cleared up in full by someone out there who knows. What I have heard is that the file cabinet contained contact information for Celebrities and some information about celebrity bookings.

When Yvonne was no longer C.O. of AOLA, she occupied an office right next door to the AO and her files were moved to that office. Yvonne worked in that office for nearly a year from early 1969 to early 1970. This is when she must have been contacting celebrites and people such as agents who knew Celebrities. It is awe inspiring to realize that this one woman, working alone on some basic purpose to help LRH and on a personal goal of hers to run an Org of celebrities and opinion leaders, in that one year of unaccounted for time, set into motion the wheels of progress that were to lead to Celebrity Centre International of today. The life of every celebrity currently affiliated with Celebrity Centre Int would be vastly different today than it is if it were not for this one woman, with her powerful intention, working away by herself in a small obscure office, unsupervised, making calls, setting up meetings with agents, etc. and doing whatever she had to do to get her Centre which she considered LRH's Centre up and going. There was no policy on what or how to do this but she knew what to do and nothing would stop her once she started to pursue her goal.

THIS IS WHAT GREATNESS IS ALL ABOUT. THIS IS AN EXAMPLE OF A BIG BEING IN ACTION AND WHAT CAN BE ACHIEVED BY ONE PERSON.

CHAPTER 2 - HELP ARRIVES IN THE FORM OF ANOTHER BIG BEING
Yvonne's plan was to first expose celebrities to auditing and then after achieving their wins, they would use their opinion leader status to encourage their publics to join Scientology. Therefore, Yvonne needed an auditor! A Class VIII, kha khan, Crackerjack auditor appeared on the scene by chance who was the best person on the planet to help Yvonne succeed. Since my opening story is patterned after the Lone Ranger radio and TV show, and Yvonne represents the Lone Ranger, let me refer to the mystery Crackerjack class VIII auditor as Tonto only so that I can write one short word to represent this auditor instead of using mystery, cracerjack Class VIII all the time.

Tonto had recently left Flag to pursue some personal matters and arrived in L.A. and just stopped in at AOLA to check in with Hanna, to say hello and see what was going on. Tonto knew both Hanna and Yvonne from the Apollo. It was Hanna who asked Tonto to say hello to Yvonne in her office right next door. This off chance request of Hanna's turned out to be key in the opening of Celebrity Centre.

In her trademark sweet manner (who could refuse Yvonne) Yvonne asked Tonto to shelve her personal plans for only six months and stay to help Yvonne get Celebrity Centre going. Tonto graciously agreed and initially Tonto did all the auditing plus the CSing, getting paid directly by the Celebrity clients.

THE BUILDING - Frank Dunn found the wooden framed building for the Centre at 1809 W. 8th St. in Central Los Angeles and the Landlords were Mr. and Mrs. Theodore Freistadt. Frank made all the arrangements but Yvonne had to go in and sign the papers and got many more concessions from the Freistadts with her incomparable charm. Nobody would know the name Freistadt if it weren't for me working in CC treasury. I had to write the rent check to them every month, it was for $800, a steal at twice the price. Twice I had to drive out and pay the couple in person and both times they reminisced about their experiences dealing with Yvonne. I dutifully took notes knowing that 38 years later, I would be writing the story of CCLA (just kidding of course). I speak a lot of German and I liked the name Friestadt which means Free City. Actually they appeared to be Jewish and not German but many Jewish people have German derived names. Once the building was acquired, Yvonne and Tonto opened for business. This occured in early 1970, I do not know the exact date.

SOME COMMENTS ABOUT TONTO I knew Tonto only slightly in those early years I was on staff, just on a saying "Hi!" when passing in the hall basis. This person was so fantastic in the ability to handle Celebrities it was unbelievable. No matter how big the Celebrity was, Tonto could always relate to them. In most of the Celebrities' eyes, as PCs, Tonto was the real Celebrity and not them. Possibly no other auditor on Earth could have handled celebrities the way Tonto did. Its as if Tonto was born to audit Celebrities, the hat fit like a glove. Tonto deserves status as Co-Founder of CC!! Tonto was there with Yvonne from Day 1 and at first all CC did was audit real celebrities so Tonto handled all Tech, scheduling and delivery functions. As with many great people in history, they usually had a person of comparable magnitude to them working with them to help them generate their power. Yvonne and Tonto formed such a team.


For a while it was just Yvonne and Tonto. The first addition had to be a C/S for Tonto and shortly after opening, Ellen Jones, Class VIII became the C/S. For awhile there was just the three of them auditing and C/S ing Celebrities but new staff began to be added. Within 6 months there were at least 50 on staff. My first experience going there was at about that time, around August of 1970. I was then a newbie, only two months into Scientology and on lines doing the Dianetics Course at L.A. Org. I went there to hear a Mario Feninger concert because I am a lover of classical music. I remember a staff member named Dick Hubbard. We arrived early before the concert and told Dick, no relation to LRH, that we would be back in an hour. Though tickets were free, he gave us our tickets because he said seating was limited and we would need the tickets to get in when we came back. We came back and saw the concert. Of course Mario was great. He wore a black cape and as was typical of all his concerts, he opened with 2 pieces by the Father and son Composers of the Baroque era, Allesandro and Domenico Scarlatti, there was intermission and my first experience in the CCLA snack bar and then Chopin for the second half of the program. I believe there was an encore which was a piece by Mario's Mother, Teresa de Rogatis. As always Mario was spectacular and the concert very memorable.

CHAPTER 3 TONTO'S CONTRACT IS EXTENDED
Six months had passed and there were more auditors and C/Ses on staff and Tonto wanted to move on and resume the personal projects which had been shelved as per the original agreements with Yvonne. As was typical with Yvonne, she begged Tonto stay longer. Tune in again tomorrow for the next episode to see what happened next.
Lakey
 
Last edited:

RogerB

Crusader
Roger - Great having you appear on this thread. It's always a joy and priviledge to read your posts. I had two questions on TR 0, the first of which concerns the definition of the word confront. As I recall from the bulletin, LRH used the synonym "to face" and that is the way I always did the drill, just to be there and face the other person. Of course, I knew of the other meanings of the word which all include a significant degree of hostility and challenge. I looked up the word just now and was surprised to read that nearly all the definitions include a hostile, bold and challenging emphasis on the facing which is done. Only one definition said merely to "go face to face with" and even that one added, "usually in a hostile manner".

Using the dictionary definition of the word would definitely lead to some terrible auditing and in using the TR's in life, the dictionary definition would lead mainly to bullying and fights. The current management of the church, led by DM, seems to be using the dictionary definition for everyday conversation because much of the communication I hear coming from them is hostile and challenging. I wonder if they are also using that sense of the word in training auditors.

Whenever I did the drill, I tried only to just face the other person and be there without doing anything else. This always seemed to get a good result. When spot checked on the words, and asked the definition of confront, I usually said it meant to face and was never flunked for that.

Lakey,

As has been noted elsewhere on ESMB, LRH too often put his own case into the tech. I think it was Mystic, or maybe Dennis Stephens, that said LRH would not "experience" but instead would only "confront with something."

But worse, regardless of how LRH sought to change the use of language and the meaning of words to suit his idea of things, the fact is that that concept, "confront" is deeply ingrained in the experience of our existence . . . . and to attempt to ignore it and make the word mean something else only bypasses charge on all of that experience.

Words are simply sound or written symbols representing concepts or conditions of existence, and as such run deep in our experience.

When a Being is told to "confront," that deep meaning and experience gets activated. With luck, a bright person might cognite while doing the exercise and rise out of "confronting" and begin to be "present with" . . . and I have seen that happen on occasion; but too often students have remained stuck in confronting.


lkwdblds said:
The second point of my question has to do with you talking about the word confront causing a separation between the student and the coach, the auditor and the pc or between two individuals in general conversation. For auditing, I had always thought that this was the natural and preferred relationshiip between an auditor and a preclear. For the auditor and the preclear to be greater than the preclear's bank there had to be a separation otherwise you would have, two auditors are greater than the pc's bank which doesn't make sense.

If the auditor and the preclear were at one with one another, wouldn't that be something like Mesmerism tried to achieve back in the 18th and 19th centuries where the operator tried to transfer his good conditions to the subject and allowed the subject's bad conditions to be transferred to the operator and then out through the operator and into the ground?

If you could, I would like to have those two points clarified further in response to my quesions above.
Lakey

When you know who you truly are, and can comfortably be wholly present, and even at one, with another, you can receive the emanations of the other and perfectly duplicate such while at the same time know it is not your sourced emanation or condition that the other Being is "getting off."

One of the tricks to not getting stuck with "effects" is to be able to correctly view as-is causation and source.

You only get stuck with others' stuff if you mis-assign source or ownership.

One of the tricks to the empowerment of others is to honor and appreciate their cause . . . however, the inverse of that is the actual being the effect or result that the other causes . . . that way you lose your own true being, and can be stuck with "effects" that are difficult to undo.

One must realize that the beginning of any cycle is the cause point, not the effect or outcome. You can only erase and "be at cause over" cycles and conditions of existence by correctly handling that source point of cause.

Rog
 

lkwdblds

Crusader
Thanks for your reply!

Lakey,

As has been noted elsewhere on ESMB, LRH too often put his own case into the tech. I think it was Mystic, or maybe Dennis Stephens, that said LRH would not "experience" but instead would only "confront with something."

I read this too on ESMB, it seems as if it was 3 or 4 months ago. It might be contained in Alan Walter's story but I do not think it was by Alan. There were some comments made by someone who came to know Ron personally and then got married and he and his wife went to dinner with Ron and Mary Sue many times. There is even a photograph included in the story, showing the 4 of them eating at a fancy restaurant not in the USA put probably England or possibly in France. Anyway, this speaker mentioned that LRH dominated all the conversations which he entered. He said that LRH was not rude and would not just cut someone off from speaking in a curt manner. Rather, while the person was speaking, LRH remained silent but there was something in his space which showed that he was not listening to you as an effect point to really hear what you had to say but rather he was confronting you. He had his remarks already planned out and just patiently, or at least seemingly so on the surface, he was waiting for you to finish so that he could take over the conversation. When you were done, he would give an appropriate acknowledgement and then take over in full the remainder of the conversation. His comments were always more profound, universal and meaningful than what had just been said by somebody else so that nobody tried to get back in there and hold up their end of the conversation but just listened to LRH talk on.

But worse, regardless of how LRH sought to change the use of language and the meaning of words to suit his idea of things, the fact is that that concept, "confront" is deeply ingrained in the experience of our existence . . . . and to attempt to ignore it and make the word mean something else only bypasses charge on all of that experience.

Words are simply sound or written symbols representing concepts or conditions of existence, and as such run deep in our experience.

When a Being is told to "confront," that deep meaning and experience gets activated. With luck, a bright person might cognite while doing the exercise and rise out of "confronting" and begin to be "present with" . . . and I have seen that happen on occasion; but too often students have remained stuck in confronting.




When you know who you truly are, and can comfortably be wholly present, and even at one, with another, you can receive the emanations of the other and perfectly duplicate such while at the same time know it is not your sourced emanation or condition that the other Being is "getting off."

One of the tricks to not getting stuck with "effects" is to be able to correctly view as-is causation and source.

You only get stuck with others' stuff if you mis-assign source or ownership.

One of the tricks to the empowerment of others is to honor and appreciate their cause . . . however, the inverse of that is the actual being the effect or result that the other causes . . . that way you lose your own true being, and can be stuck with "effects" that are difficult to undo.

One must realize that the beginning of any cycle is the cause point, not the effect or outcome. You can only erase and "be at cause over" cycles and conditions of existence by correctly handling that source point of cause.
Rog

Rog - Thank you so much for taking the time to give me such a thorough reply! While you were writing it, I was posting my new story of the formation of Celebrity Centre. I read your comments and answers to my questions and certainly with the way confront is defined in the dictionaries, I can not dispute the excellent points you made in response to my questions.

The second answer which you gave me requires a little more study by me as the topic and your answer is quite weighty. I am in a hurry right know but I will read the second half of your answer later this day. As I say, it is a weighty topic and I will undoubtedly have some comments to make and will get back to you later today on this.
Lakey

Rog - Lakey here about 7 hours later with the rest of of comments on you fine post. I added something in "teal" directly under one of your comment about confronting. On your second point, starting in the late 70's, I received a lot of accupressure massages from a guy at a gym I worked out at. I used LRH's HCOB on "Touch Assists - Correctly Done" which had a lot of theory on how and why they worked and applied this to accupressure, which I seemed to have had a knack for doing myself. I started giving accupressure treatments to friends and acquaintences and had fantastic wins doing this. I could get rid of the most amazing long term pains and chronic problems but these were all like key outs, in 3 days or so, the problem would usually be back. Rog, I told you in a exchange we had many months ago that on perhaps 50% of the people I worked on I started picking up their pictures. On two female subjects, in particular, I virtually read their mind like an open book. I could see all the pictures they were seeing and knew what they were thinking. I was OT by that time and mentioned this to an OT I knew and he said that if I could do that when I touched their heads then I should be able to do it without touching them. I tried it and could still pick up on a person's picture about 1/2 the time but it was harder for me when not touching their heads. When I related this to you, you called me an "adept".

Tieing this in to your comments above, I was not in as good a case shape then as I am now. As a man in my late 30's and early 40's I had sex on my mind 24/7 and thank God I don't have that problem going on any more, now it is only sex on demand, there is still something there but only if I want it to be. This fact, plus getting a 15% discount at all fast food places and at the movies are the biggest benefits of aging. Anyway, I knew these pictures and thoughts were not mine but belonged to the subject I was working on. After the accupressure session was over, none of the pictures, thoughts or any beingnesses stuck to me as far as I am aaware.

The last paragraph of your comments above, which I put in bold print, are very sage and profound. The second and last sentence is incredibly powerful. If one has mishandled a cause point in his past, you are saying if one wanted to handle, erase and "be at cause over" the bad effects which that generated, one would have to go back and properly handle the source point of cause properly before that could occur. Did I papaphrase you correctly?
Lakey
 
Last edited:
NEVER BEFORE TOLD STORY!

EXCLUSIVE THE STORY OF CELEBRITY CENTER'S FOUNDING


I didn't know that.

Here is minor addition to the story.

Yvonne saw our center's sign. It was walnut stained wood about 3 feet wide and 4 feet high. She liked it, and I made the one for CC too. It had gold (plastic) letters saying something like CoS Celebrity Centre,the address, Sunday Services, Yvonne Gillham

They placed it, as you faced the building from the street, on the right. I remember seeing it often. My little contribution.
 

Blue Spirit

Silver Meritorious Patron
Dennis Stephens

Lakey,

As has been noted elsewhere on ESMB, LRH too often put his own case into the tech. I think it was Mystic, or maybe Dennis Stephens, that said LRH would not "experience" but instead would only "confront with something."

But worse, regardless of how LRH sought to change the use of language and the meaning of words to suit his idea of things, the fact is that that concept, "confront" is deeply ingrained in the experience of our existence . . . . and to attempt to ignore it and make the word mean something else only bypasses charge on all of that experience.

Words are simply sound or written symbols representing concepts or conditions of existence, and as such run deep in our experience.

When a Being is told to "confront," that deep meaning and experience gets activated. With luck, a bright person might cognite while doing the exercise and rise out of "confronting" and begin to be "present with" . . . and I have seen that happen on occasion; but too often students have remained stuck in confronting.




When you know who you truly are, and can comfortably be wholly present, and even at one, with another, you can receive the emanations of the other and perfectly duplicate such while at the same time know it is not your sourced emanation or condition that the other Being is "getting off."

One of the tricks to not getting stuck with "effects" is to be able to correctly view as-is causation and source.

You only get stuck with others' stuff if you mis-assign source or ownership.

One of the tricks to the empowerment of others is to honor and appreciate their cause . . . however, the inverse of that is the actual being the effect or result that the other causes . . . that way you lose your own true being, and can be stuck with "effects" that are difficult to undo.

One must realize that the beginning of any cycle is the cause point, not the effect or outcome. You can only erase and "be at cause over" cycles and conditions of existence by correctly handling that source point of cause.

Rog

As I posted before it was Dennis Stephens who said LRH was a "Confronter"

and did it instead of experiencing. Last I looked his recording and transcript

were available on the net that contained that statement.
 

purple haze

Patron with Honors
blonde on blonde

Theres Purple Haze, a Brit blonde

http://forum.exscn.net/member.php?u=5756

Then theres Purple Rain, an aussi blonde

http://forum.exscn.net/member.php?u=5799

And you blonde "edith" carmeloorchards need to learn the dif.

:omg:

So sorry: no longer blonde but bright red for Christmas with a smashing purple hat:dieslaughing:

In the last 42 years, I do remember: having fun with the crew while the Royal Scotsman was in dry dock and also when we were stranded on shore; dancing the night away with MSH to Jimi Hendrix [hence, Purple Haze];seeing 2001 A Space Odyssey in London when it first came out with my favorite SO team; watching a Christmas movie on ACW's lap surrounded by the Royal Scotsman crew, with Ron and Mary Sue and Hubbard children sitting close by; Captain Bill strumming his guitar while we got hosed down outback of the AOLA; double dating with Yvonne Gillham; window shopping in Beverly Hills with Bob Thomas; Celebrity Center concerts in the early days [hey ilwilkds!?] = it all was fun and games in the good old days.
Stories abound whatever dynamic it was on:happydance: whatever color the hair...
 
Last edited:

lkwdblds

Crusader
I didn't know that.

Here is minor addition to the story.

Yvonne saw our center's sign. It was walnut stained wood about 3 feet wide and 4 feet high. She liked it, and I made the one for CC too. It had gold (plastic) letters saying something like CoS Celebrity Centre,the address, Sunday Services, Yvonne Gillham

They placed it, as you faced the building from the street, on the right. I remember seeing it often. My little contribution.

Google Yvonne Jentzsch, Click on Images instead of Web and a picture of the building and also Yvonne's face comes up, enlarge the picture and your sign is there on the right, as you say. with all the words on it and is easy to read. Will someone who is computer tech savy please pull up that image and post it here. You know, older people such as me are not that computer savy and my Son is up North for Xmas so I can't ask him to do it for me.
Lakey
 
Last edited:

lkwdblds

Crusader
"If it isn't fun it isn't Scientology!

So sorry: no longer blonde but bright red for Christmas with a smashing purple hat:dieslaughing:

In the last 42 years, I do remember: having fun with the crew while the Royal Scotsman was in dry dock and also when we were stranded on shore; dancing the night away with MSH to Jimi Hendrix [hence, Purple Haze];seeing 2001 A Space Odyssey in London when it first came out with my favorite SO team; watching a Christmas movie on ACW's lap surrounded by the Royal Scotsman crew, with Ron and Mary Sue and Hubbard children sitting close by; Captain Bill strumming his guitar while we got hosed down outback of the AOLA; double dating with Yvonne Gillham; window shopping in Beverly Hills with Bob Thomas; Celebrity Center concerts in the early days [hey ilwilkds!?] = it all was fun and games in the good old days.
Stories abound whatever dynamic it was on:happydance: whatever color the hair...

Hey Purple Haze! Somebody clued me in about your screen name arising from Jimi Hendrix when I showed them your fantastic post about runing out the 3rd dynamic. Amazing that you chose a screen name from a pleasure moment 42 years ago. If I follwed your lead and chose a screen name from 1967, my screen name would be something like "Hornedtoad" refering to being a horney guy.

Remember the two sayings rampant in the Orgs in the old days, "If it isn't fun it isn't Scientology" and "Scientology is the only game in the Universe where everyone wins." Somehow, when the current management took over, somebody in the "hat pack assembly unit" forgot to include those two issues in the hat packs of all the new senior execs and Scn has never been the same. Don't let anyone tell you those lower level posts down in the basement are not that important. Look at what this screw up in hat pack assembly has led to! A pleasure moment like what you just described would be enough to last one for a decade!
Lakey
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top