What's new

The Little Thread Which Grew - the Apollo '73 to Everything But

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: Note on Pilot’s Post – Past Present Future

here's a recipe for jello shots

jellyshots.jpg


http://cocktails.about.com/od/cocktailrecipes/r/jelo_shtr.htm

Those kind of shots make sense !

I highly suggest Lakey get a dozen or more shots from there !

That is one fine bar to be drinking on !

Hello Mello Jello !

Them thar things are soul food !
 
Re: The old days - Aboard the Apollo - 1973

Easy to say when you are never attacked - as is the case with you and also FoTi!
Lakey

Quite true! 'though not quite "never" for me. I have been attacked, though not to the degree you feel you have, to be sure!

When it happenes to me I wait until I'm no longer P.O.'d about it, restate my case to, hopefully better state what I meant. If I get back more 'attack' I recall what one of my high school English teachers once said when he was attacked or insulted: "I just consider the source, and dismiss it." :thumbsup:

Remember Mycroft Holmes, Sherlock's smarter brother? He would rather let others think him wrong than bother making the effort to demonstrate he was, in fact, right. A philosophy I try to embrace.

I love this thread and thank you hugely for starting it and letting it grow as it has, embracing so much great stuff. I just find all the bickering, of late, to be, well, tedious.

Jack
 
Re: The old days - Aboard the Apollo - 1973

Awww Jack! How many guys here do you think have actually read enough of Holmes to know about Mycroft? Just the rare ones, I reckon.
 
Re: The old days - Aboard the Apollo - 1973

Awww Jack! How many guys here do you think have actually read enough of Holmes to know about Mycroft? Just the rare ones, I reckon.

Doesn't everyone read Conan Doyle at school? I thought they did.


 
Re: The old days - Aboard the Apollo - 1973

Quite true! 'though not quite "never" for me. I have been attacked, though not to the degree you feel you have, to be sure!

When it happenes to me I wait until I'm no longer P.O.'d about it, restate my case to, hopefully better state what I meant. If I get back more 'attack' I recall what one of my high school English teachers once said when he was attacked or insulted: "I just consider the source, and dismiss it." :thumbsup:

Remember Mycroft Holmes, Sherlock's smarter brother? He would rather let others think him wrong than bother making the effort to demonstrate he was, in fact, right. A philosophy I try to embrace.

I love this thread and thank you hugely for starting it and letting it grow as it has, embracing so much great stuff. I just find all the bickering, of late, to be, well, tedious.

Jack

Okay, your post presents very positive info. I am not going to knock what you said, it's good advice, and if acted on would make Earth a much more pleasant place.

It seems to me that there is a very fine line which each of us must walk when we are criticized or attacked. Tedious bickering is definitely not the answer but being a doormat and letting people walk all over you with impunity seems to be too extreme in the other direction.

I don't have the answer as to what to do; it seems as if it is a skill which some are good at and others are not. You offered an excellent answer and I tip my hat to you and will keep what you wrote in mind for future use.

I'm really happy that you are enjoying this thread. Hopefully, the bickering will die down. Thank you very much for standing up for your beliefs and laying out a rational solution which all of us can apply.
Lakey
 
Re: Note on Pilot’s Post – Past Present Future

... Just that poor Lakey ended up painting a big target in the center of his forehead :biggrin: And that proved too inviting for the mischievous nature of the Toad!:p ...

Very true. L in his continual misconceptions & misrepresentations despite being constantly corrected by others has made directing seemingly 'mean words' at him unfortunately all too necessary on so many occasions as to amount to practically a continuous process.

Far from being the 'victim' in this, if anyone can be characterized as being victimized then it would be those whose views have been misrepresented by Lakey (albeit more from ignorance than malice) and those who have been all too frequently subjected to his misguided & unsupported 'analysis'. :eyeroll:


Mark A. Baker
 
Re: The old days - Aboard the Apollo - 1973

This is a matter of no consequence, but I was surprised a few days ago when Lakey scolded me quite strongly for comments that I never made!

For a very intelligent woman you have a penchant for missing points which I am making. Of course there's no problem if two people's realities don't agree but that has nothing to do with my complaint with what you stated.

What you stated was, "So yeah, I think it's just Voodoo which has no real effect on anybody." Do you see my point, I'm totally happy with us having different realities or opinions on something but I object to your follow up statement which sort of equates me to nobody and suggests that my opinion is not real.

It's only that one statement which I highlighted in blue which I find offensive. The rest of your post was spot on with me.
Lakey

Just for clarification, I quote myself:

Lakey, I know you don't want to hear (read) this, but I think you've fallen for some strange frequency-Voodoo. I've put your words to the test:

1. I took one of the concert guitars I have here, tuned it to exactly A= 440 Hz, played a song, then tuned it to A=432 Hz and played the same song. The result was what I expected: At 432 Hz the Guitar was a bit easier to play, sounded a little smoother and a bit more muddy, due to the slightly lower string tension. That's all. Guitar vendors all over the world tune their instruments a little lower for that exact reason: They're easier to play and (the instrument's as well as the player's) mistakes are less audible. Which, by the way, is the reason why I always carry a good digital tuner with me, when I shop for instruments. :)

2. I replayed a stored Classical and a stored Blues song on an electric piano at A= 440 Hz and at A=432 Hz, and although the difference in the same songs was audible when switching between these two tunings, it had no emotional effect on me. You may blame my almost 40 years on stage for that.

So yeah, I think it's just Voodoo which has no real effect on anybody.

You have a computer, right? Try it yourself, download Audacity and tune any recorded song to whatever you like. The program is free for personal use and it's available for all major platforms, AFAIK.

Oh, and about discord: Did you ever look inside a piano? Did you ever tune one? Most keys have 3 strings/key. Tune all 3 strings of any keys to their exact same frequency. What do you get? An extremely dull sounding piano at best. You don't need to believe me, you can just try it yourself. An acceptable digital chromatic tuner shouldn't cost you more than 25 bucks.

But don't come running to me when your piano sounds like shit, after you've tried that. :coolwink:

:cheers:, MrN


So it can be easily confirmed that it was me who said that, not Smilla. :wink2:

As I say, it's of no consequence, but it rather puzzled me at the time.

Misunderstandings happen. No blame.
 
Re: The old days - Aboard the Apollo - 1973

Quite true! 'though not quite "never" for me. I have been attacked, though not to the degree you feel you have, to be sure!

When it happenes to me I wait until I'm no longer P.O.'d about it, restate my case to, hopefully better state what I meant. If I get back more 'attack' I recall what one of my high school English teachers once said when he was attacked or insulted: "I just consider the source, and dismiss it." :thumbsup:

Remember Mycroft Holmes, Sherlock's smarter brother? He would rather let others think him wrong than bother making the effort to demonstrate he was, in fact, right. A philosophy I try to embrace.

I love this thread and thank you hugely for starting it and letting it grow as it has, embracing so much great stuff. I just find all the bickering, of late, to be, well, tedious.

Jack

Me too.
 
Re: Note on Pilot’s Post – Past Present Future

Very true. L in his continual misconceptions & misrepresentations despite being constantly corrected by others has made directing seemingly 'mean words' at him unfortunately all too necessary on so many occasions as to amount to practically a continuous process.

Far from being the 'victim' in this, if anyone can be characterized as being victimized then it would be those whose views have been misrepresented by Lakey (albeit more from ignorance than malice) and those who have been all too frequently subjected to his misguided & unsupported 'analysis'. :eyeroll:


Mark A. Baker

L had himself a hissey fit over something.

Am I the only person who sees him get in the corner, bend over, drop his pants, bow his head & with a bucket of dry sand between his feet beg anybody to do him ?
Was that really his forehead ? LOL !

He complains about " mean words" ( on a frickin chat board ) directed towards him ?
This is somebody who claims he got so much out of the Communication Course.
Back when I did that course there was this thing called Bull Bait. I wonder if he ever did it ?

Now when I audited the grades the was level zero & thr EP was someyhing about willing to talk to anybody about anything. Maybe L could refresh my memory of taht EP ( without quoting the never give or receive you yourself desire - or words to that effect ).

But, anyhow, this is all silly and is providing a great deal of humor - and Dear Readers, do remember L has me on ignore so nothing I post impinges in his world as those troubling ' means words' that must be avoided around the Kumbyeya Marshmellow Roast Campfire.

Toss one on the fire for me. eh ?
 
Re: The old days - Aboard the Apollo - 1973

Doesn't everyone read Conan Doyle at school? I thought they did.



I read some in school, though not much.

After I got out (of school) I read all of ACD's Sherlock (several times) where I met Mycroft!

Jack
 
Re: The old days - Aboard the Apollo - 1973

I read some in school, though not much.

After I got out (of school) I read all of ACD's Sherlock (several times) where I met Mycroft!

Jack

I did all of my schooling as a boarder - some of it at an English school where there's nothing much to do in the evenings besides reading or study, and the Conan Doyle books were very popular both in and out of class. We'd take turns reading them out, and they were great fun. Sir Walter Scott, and Joseph Conrad were very popular too. The Sherlock Holmes books were great for communal reading, as there was always a suspenseful moment where they could be left hanging for the following evening. That brings back some nice memories for me.
 
Last edited:
Re: The old days - Aboard the Apollo - 1973

<snip... left hanging for the following evening. That brings back some nice memories for me.

Yeah, i know the feeling. I want around here for the main man to get his post all composed, proof read, tweaked, and run it by a few close confidants before it gets posted.

It can take for hours for him to get all those tweaks done for that final approval to post.

It's a cliff hanger I tell ya !

:roflmao::hysterical::roflmao::hysterical::roflmao::hysterical::roflmao::hysterical::roflmao::hysterical:
 
Re: The old days - Aboard the Apollo - 1973

Awww Jack! How many guys here do you think have actually read enough of Holmes to know about Mycroft? Just the rare ones, I reckon.

I've read all of the canon of Dr. Watson plus have seen the Rathbone / Bruce movies dozens of times.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top