afaceinthecrowd asked some questions....
Q,Q,Q etc.
1. A. Any personal info I will not divulge. The CoS has ways of data-profiling to narrow down identities. They will seek revenge.
2. Q. What is your agenda for ESMB?
A. I don't have an agenda for ESMB. I have one for Scientology. Gone.
3. Q. Opinions.
A. I read many opinions. Some are useful, some are not.
4. Q. Characterizations.
A. I don't know who specifically you are referring. If it's this thread then
it's obvious. Mayo, Rinder, Rathbun, Miscavige.
5. Q. Immediately Answers.
A. They can do what they like. Take as long as they like. I have no
control over that, but I can express my opinion. My anger was vented
because one of the people who directly created Scientology appeared on
this forum. That's like the drug-dealer who sold the drugs that killed your
child turning up at a therapy meeting. I got angry.
Thank you, TRNU.
I have numbered your answers and will respond accordingly.
1. Yes, that is a possibility of which I am at more risk of than you. However, I chose to divulge what I felt was sufficient “Context” re: afaceinthecrowd so as to have the latitude to post some things that I thought may be of value to me fellow ESMB Members.
2. My personal opinion is that no one comes to a Board like ESMB without some form of Agenda…even it it’s simply to ridicule or grandstand. However, I will accept your answer and, in doing so, find it non sequitur that your posts here are accordant with your sole agenda item for Scientology. Most folks here are already gone or are in the process of going.
3. I did not ask you a question re: opinions, however, thank you for your opinion of opinions.
4. I did not ask a question re characterizations, however, I will answer the question you asked me. Obviously, I’m referring to your OP and posts on this thread. If you can’t see blanket characterizations and specified ones for David Mayo, then one of us is confused somewhat in what they read and write. Also, as a former Senior Flag Exec, I am one of the folks that you say you despise as, although I don’t have a Blog, I am Journaling and writing “Op Eds” that are being linked to around the net. I never expected that and, actually, never expected I’d end up revealing as much as I have about El Ron, the SO, Flag, DM, M&M et al. It was the all the good ESMB folks that you mischaracterized in, to me, juvenile sarcasm that have encouraged me to do so.
5. There were hundreds of “Tech” folks that directly created Scn and that information is well chronicled here on ESMB and, in a number of cases, by the very individual that was the actual “source” of that part of the “Tech”. David Mayo was one of these folks, but there were many before him. Frankly, from my view, very little of the truly evil or damaging stuff came from these other “sources”, especially Mayo. L. Ron Hubbard, Jr. was the self admitted source of a fraction some of the evil stuff and he “blew the whistle” on himself and El Ron. Mayo was involved with the development of refinements and procedures in the “Tech” and not the fundamental principles or structure of “The Bridge”. From my personal experience, “Tech” folks like Mayo are not as culpable in the grand scheme of things as are ‘Admin” folks like me. I am confident that I was directly responsible for far, far more folks starting their basic courses and getting in to Scn than David Mayo ever was. One of the biggest hits—arguably the biggest—that Institutionalized Scn ever took was Mayo’s leaving, starting ACC and his legal battle.
I get it that you are angry. IMHO, your anger would be more accurately placed being leveled at me rather than David Mayo.
Peace.
Face
