I pretty much got something out of every aspect of Scientology that I did, but then that is the way I am with everything.
I tend to really "put myself into" whatever I am doing. I can find value and goodness anywhere, and in just about anything.
So, I never had a problem writing success stories. Though the whole way it was set up as required and mandatory seemed nutty to me.
Just like the constant presence of Hubbard in every org. I could understand how some people might like, admire and appreciate Hubbard, but the constant presence of Hubbard in EVERY ROOM was entirely ridiculous to me. That became even more ridiculous when I found out that there was an LRH Office in every org, and pictures of LRH everywhere because he had written policies that ORDERED such things.
Hubbard wrote about how, "the public stays away in droves if you are not pushing LRH". He wrote that "the public wants an LRH org". Of course, he just MADE ALL OF THAT UP, and acted as if his comments were the result of actual honest observations. Hubbard set it up so that his picture would be everywhere, and THAT seemed so nuts to me.
The same with the mandatory success story line. It always seemed to me that it was both a "protection" device, and an aspect of the mind control. As a protection device, no person can ever later claim that they didn't get what they paid for, because there are the signed and witnessed success stories! In terms of mind control, one is constantly being asked (forced) to attest and claim certainty for various abilities and states, and that greatly reinforces the delusion. All of these people are claiming states and abilities, in concert with each other, and this forms a sort of momentum where the IDEAS about the gains and abilities take seniority over any contradictory reality.
Plus, Hubbard said that a "false attest" places a person in a condition of Treason. There are various factors working here to mold the minds and behaviors of the followers.
It always seem strange to me that a person didn't go out and live life for awhile, and then after experiencing real evidence of gains or abilities, THEN come back and attest. But no, Hubbard set it up so that all of this resided inside the mind, and was entirely subjective. He blocked off the possibility of verification through observation and experience. Otherwise the success story line would have been different that it was/is.